Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police fatally shoot pedestrian on Interstate 5 in Carlsbad
North County Times ^ | Dec 28, 2005 | YVETTE URREA

Posted on 12/28/2005 12:16:15 PM PST by radar101

CARLSBAD ---- An officer-involved fatal shooting on southbound Interstate 5 Tuesday caused major traffic delays through the evening rush hour.

A police officer shot a rock-throwing suspect who charged him with a screwdriver on the right shoulder of I-5, authorities said. The man, described as possibly homeless, was shot twice in the upper torso at 1:41 p.m. just south of Carlsbad Village Drive, police Lt. Bill Rowland said. He was taken to a hospital, where he died, Rowland said.

Officers initially closed all lanes of traffic, then opened the two faster lanes, California Highway Patrol Officer Tom Kerns said. Traffic was backed up nearly to the county line until 7 p.m., Carlsbad police spokeswoman Lynn Diamond said. Police also closed the southbound onramps to I-5 at Carlsbad Village and Las Flores drives. Westbound Highway 78 was also backed up from Jefferson Street, she said.

Officers initially responded to a postal carrier's report of vandalism at 12:44 p.m. in the 4100 block of Adams Street, Rowland said. The postal worker said a transient, described as a black man about 23 years old, threw something like a rock at his window and shattered it, he said.

Officers started looking for the transient, and about 55 minutes later an officer got information that he was walking north on southbound I-5, Diamond said. The officer started to get out of his patrol car to talk to him and the man advanced on him, Rowland said. At 1:41 p.m. the officer reported the suspect was down and asked for an ambulance to handle gunshot wounds, Diamond said.

"The suspect charged the officer with a screwdriver in his hand. The officer told him several times to stop and retreated to the back of his patrol car," Rowland said. "When he could not retreat any more, he fired two shots striking the suspect. It all happened very quick."

Rowland said the longtime officer did not even have time to call for backup before it happened. The officer pulled up at 1:40 p.m. and a minute later was asking for the ambulance, he said.

The wounded man fell in front of the patrol car. Paramedics were on scene quickly and transported the suspect to a local trauma hospital for treatment, Rowland said. Another officer accompanied him to the hospital, he said.

Police did not release the name of the officer involved in the shooting or the name of the suspect. No one else was harmed.

Officers closed the two slower lanes to document the crime scene until 5:35 p.m., when they opened all the lanes again, but traffic remained slow until 7 p.m. At one point during the investigation, officers briefly closed all four lanes again to take photographs from the center divider, then allowed the two lanes to flow through again, Kerns said. Traffic on Carlsbad Boulevard and Coast Highway in Oceanside were also affected.

Contact staff writer Yvette Urrea at (760) 901-4076 or yurrea@nctimes.com.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: crime; goodriddance; goodwork; homeless; transient
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: armyavonlady

WHen faced with a life or death situation, the best choice is to aim for the bigest target - the torso. And Cops usually don't shoot unless it IS a life or death situation.

Shooting a handgun accurately isn't as easy as shooting a rifle and under stress conditions is even harder. If I were a cop, I'd only shoot if I had to, and then aim for the torso.


41 posted on 12/28/2005 1:05:25 PM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt
Because they are taught to double tap to center mass. They don't train that way. Personally, if it was me, I would have had enough presence of mind to acknowledge it was just a screwdriver and the perp would have been shot in the shoulder. I can't speak for this officer because I wasn't there. I'm sure the shooting will be investigated, and it may have been picked up by his vehicle camera.
42 posted on 12/28/2005 1:10:07 PM PST by fisherman90814
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Well said. I can't count the number of excessive force suits I've dealt with defending, whether they involved simple injuries or deaths. The more homework done at the scene, the better the agency/municipality is able to defend these incessant civil suits which are inevitably filed.

Make it harder for people to sue and maybe the inconvenience to the general public wouldn't be as great.


43 posted on 12/28/2005 1:12:53 PM PST by armyavonlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

I actually mis-spoke (typed). Our officers are taught to shoot until the threat is gone. Preferably that means that the offender stops shooting/moving. If it means emptying the magazine, so be it.


44 posted on 12/28/2005 1:14:47 PM PST by armyavonlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: CdMGuy
Exactly.

Any freeway in SoCal, any time.

I wonder if it's the same in N. Cal.

45 posted on 12/28/2005 1:28:15 PM PST by TheOracleAtLilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TheOracleAtLilac

Why are the freeway lanes closed at an incident like this?

1. LIABILTY
(Think ATTORNEYS)


46 posted on 12/28/2005 1:36:04 PM PST by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: radar101

He lost his job to an illegal immigrant.


47 posted on 12/28/2005 1:49:16 PM PST by STD (Grab Your Ankles, I'm From the Gub'ment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
B.S.
it's strictly pc run amok.
Time won't affect the evidence.
&, as indicated earlier, whether a shooting, car accident, or fire
the lanes are shut down !

48 posted on 12/28/2005 1:51:37 PM PST by TheOracleAtLilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: fisherman90814
I would have had enough presence of mind to acknowledge it was just a screwdriver and the perp would have been shot in the shoulder

You and John Wayne.

What are you gonna do when the first round misses the shoulder, cuz he's running at you, and you put it through the window of the car behind him, killing the occupant?

Shooting for center of mass has multiple reasons, not just stopping the perp, but making sure your missed rounds don't hit bystnaders.

49 posted on 12/28/2005 1:51:43 PM PST by Bear_Slayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Bear_Slayer

bystnaders=bystanders


50 posted on 12/28/2005 1:53:09 PM PST by Bear_Slayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TheOracleAtLilac

"Time won't affect the evidence."

You're kidding, right?


51 posted on 12/28/2005 1:56:26 PM PST by armyavonlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: armyavonlady
NO

as in 1 hour vs. 4 hours to survey the scene
what "extra" can be gathered in those extra 3 hours

Unless, everyone's working real slooooooow - to pad OT, socialize & demonstrate da power

52 posted on 12/28/2005 2:07:05 PM PST by TheOracleAtLilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: radar101
From what I read in the article the officer did the right thing. If anything he gave his assailant more of a chance than he needed to give him.

The assailant was throwing rocks at moving cars on the interstate, which definitely shows that he was willing to use what was quite possibly deadly violence.

The officer retreated before the assailant, which he is not required to do.

The assailant was armed with a potentially deadly weapon and had already shown a willingness to use such force.

It did not say if the officer had a TASER or not, but even if he did I don't think it would have been the appropriate weapon. It has limited range, and after one shot it becomes a contact weapon unless the assailant is going to wait until you switch out the cartridge.

There is no reason for an officer to risk their life by grappling with an armed opponent just to avoid harming someone who is intent on trying to seriously wound or kill them.

Getting stabbed would also allow the assailant free to quite possibly kill others.

The appropriate thing for the officer to do was to shoot the assailant and continue firing until the threat was removed. That means the officer doesn't stop shooting until the assailant drops or stops advancing.

I think the officer clearly did the right thing and I'm glad that no one was seriously harmed other than the person who brought it on himself.
53 posted on 12/28/2005 2:08:43 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GW and Twins Pawpaw
I actually over heard a guy say last night 'couldn't they just shoot him in the leg'? I did NOT attempt to converse with this individual (roll eyes).

Just shrug and tell the guy that blowing a hole in the femoral artery will kill someone just as fast as a torso shot.

A gun is a lethal weapon. If the criminals don't want killed, they shouldn't make people shoot them.

It doesn't address the fact that a leg isn't an especally easy target on an advancing assailant under stress, but they aren't going to get that point anyway. They've learned everything they know about guns from TV.

54 posted on 12/28/2005 2:16:05 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TheOracleAtLilac

At the risk of trying to communicate with someone who is predisposed to think law enforcement has nothing better to do than stand around and get paid to do nothing:

In those three extra hours, they can:
collect physical evidence
collect testimonial evidence
identify witnesses
take measurements
take photographs
secure the scene to ensure it is safe for the general public

and those are just for starters.

As a taxpayer, I would think you'd be interested in law enforcement doing all they can to gather information and evidence while the scene is fresh, not to mention ensuring your safety, so that less taxpayer funds are spent on defending a civil suit arising from the incident. Many agencies and muncipalities are insured. Others are self-insured. Regardless, thousands of dollars of YOUR money are spend defending suits brought by incidents just like this.

If you're so outraged at how long you have to wait, it might be worth your energy to find out how much money is spent in your immediate area defending civil suits against law enforcement officers who are simply doing their jobs. Then you'd really be outraged.


55 posted on 12/28/2005 2:18:23 PM PST by armyavonlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic

I thought this guy was as dumb as a stump and I wasn't going to waste my time trying to educate him. If some jackass is charging me with a screwdriver in his hand the only thing on my mind is going home to my family in an unventilated state if you know what I mean.


56 posted on 12/28/2005 2:20:37 PM PST by GW and Twins Pawpaw (Sheepdog for Five [My grandkids are way more important than any lefty's feelings!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Bear_Slayer

"Aim small, miss small"


57 posted on 12/28/2005 2:36:13 PM PST by BreitbartSentMe (Ex-Democrat since 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: armyavonlady
OK, let's beat this ol' horse some more 
 
In those three extra hours, they can:
collect physical evidence shell csaings- check, screwdriver - check, tag & bag some dirt that we'll
                                      match to the deceased's clothes & pick up some of dem rocks....yeah    
collect testimonial evidence "yeah, I shot his miserable ass !"
identify witnesses you mean the ones in San Diego, by now
take measurements of what, pray tell
take photographs of the deceased who's long gone ? of his rocks ? of the dirt ? of passing motorists ?
secure the scene to ensure it is safe for the general public dem pesky rocks again

and those are just for starters for those who need job security & OT.
                 (You an ambulance chaser by profession/avocation ?)

As a taxpayer, I would think you'd be interested in law enforcement doing all they can to gather information and evidence while the scene is fresh, not to mention ensuring your safety HUH ? the perp's dead ! , so that less taxpayer funds are spent on defending a civil suit arising from the incident by one of your fellow travelers from the ACLU ?. Many agencies and muncipalities are insured.we're only talking 'bout the grandstanders from the CHP - got it ?  Others are self-insured. Regardless, thousands of dollars of YOUR money are spend defending suits brought by incidents just like this. Don't care 'bout other agencies - cuz they don't unnesessairly shut down the freeway.

If you're so outraged at how long you have to wait, it might be worth your energy to find out how much money is spent in your immediate area defending civil suits against law enforcement officers who are simply doing their jobs. Then you'd really be outraged. Try disgusted !
 
Mark Twain was right !

58 posted on 12/28/2005 2:47:14 PM PST by TheOracleAtLilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Bush_Democrat

Aim small, right in the middle of the chest.


59 posted on 12/28/2005 3:21:33 PM PST by Bear_Slayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson