Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

West resigns itself to a nuclear Iran (Barf Alert)
Scotsman.com ^ | Sun 15 Jan 2006 | IAN MATHER

Posted on 01/14/2006 7:22:28 PM PST by indcons

WESTERN governments face defeat in their attempts to stop Iran from pursuing its drive to become a nuclear power.

Officials in London and Washington now privately admit that they must face the painful fact that there is nothing they can do, despite deep suspicions that Tehran is seeking to develop nuclear weapons under cover of researching nuclear energy for peaceful purposes.

Yesterday a defiant Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said his country would not be deflected from its right to develop nuclear technology by referral to the UN Security Council for possible sanctions.

"If they want to destroy the Iranian nation's rights by that course, they will not succeed," he said, adding that Tehran did not need nuclear weapons because they are only used by nations who "want to solve everything through the use of force".

Publicly, the US and Britain, the two countries that have adopted the most hawkish stance, are pressing for international action to stop Iran. US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said last week that it was time for the UN to confront Iran's "defiance" over its nuclear programme, while British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw insisted that sanctions were now "on the table".

But behind the scenes there is no stomach for a fight. The US is the only country that could take military action. But with the US military already seriously overstretched in Iraq and with the mid-term congressional elections approaching there is no impetus in the White House or in Congress for another military adventure.

"Iran would be a far tougher country to try to attack than Iraq. It is three times as big and has highly motivated armed forces," a Foreign Office diplomat said yesterday.

(Excerpt) Read more at scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; irannukes; middleeast; proliferation; surrender
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
The world cannot sit silent as another muslim country goes nuclear......
1 posted on 01/14/2006 7:22:30 PM PST by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: indcons

M.A.D. only works when the enemy isn't actually mad.

Iran will see to it that someone uses their weapons,
just as soon as they come off the assembly line.

We need to down the power lines to those lines now,
and keep them down.

Tehran doubtless knows that Tel Aviv has a Masada
Contingency, which is the vaporizing of all key
islamic coordinates if Israel is ever nuked. The
beardbrains in Tehran know it, and don't care.


2 posted on 01/14/2006 7:27:04 PM PST by Boundless (M.A.D. Mutually Assured Destruction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons
The US is the only country that could take military action.

Really? Not a single other country in the world has the capability of launching airstrikes that might at least slow down Iranian nuclear ambitions?

3 posted on 01/14/2006 7:28:16 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

And when they do use Nukes the world will cry and mourn the fact that there was a time when the Iranians could have been defeated, but no one wanted to stop them until they used there weapons.


4 posted on 01/14/2006 7:30:37 PM PST by Duke Wayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

This journalist is way ahead of the curve. He's given up before hostilities even started.


5 posted on 01/14/2006 7:32:37 PM PST by Nachoman (Optimism is a gift - cynicism is earned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Quite a few countries have the capabilities....however, very few have the will to take on the mad mullahs.


6 posted on 01/14/2006 7:34:09 PM PST by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

Excellent points all.....I agree entirely.


7 posted on 01/14/2006 7:34:49 PM PST by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Duke Wayne
And when they do use Nukes the world will blame the U.S. for not doing something about it.
8 posted on 01/14/2006 7:38:14 PM PST by teenyelliott (Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: indcons
"Officials in London and Washington now privately admit that they must face the painful fact that there is nothing they can do"

My goodness, everyone wants to quote Murtha in their stories now.

9 posted on 01/14/2006 7:39:11 PM PST by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons
there is nothing they can do [the Americans and Brits]

Hahahaha! That is funny.

10 posted on 01/14/2006 7:39:14 PM PST by teenyelliott (Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

There is no way on this earth that Israel is going to let it happen....PERIOD


11 posted on 01/14/2006 7:40:54 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: indcons
But behind the scenes there is no stomach for a fight. The US is the only country that could take military action. But with the US military already seriously overstretched in Iraq and with the mid-term congressional elections approaching there is no impetus in the White House or in Congress for another military adventure.

"Iran would be a far tougher country to try to attack than Iraq. It is three times as big and has highly motivated armed forces," a Foreign Office diplomat said yesterday.

"Highly motivated armed forces" -- yes, we heard that with Iraq too. There are many sides to Iran. They are used to rule by the nutcase, zealot or loony-emperor of the day. That does not make for high-security in any installation.

And Iran does not have to be attacked so much as imploded.

12 posted on 01/14/2006 7:41:42 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Party_Animal
"Officials in London and Washington now privately admit that they must face the painful fact that there is nothing they can do"

LMAO It's a toss-up who wrote this, Murtha or Ma Fifteen Minutes of Fame from Texas.

13 posted on 01/14/2006 7:48:25 PM PST by DoughtyOne (01/11/06: Ted Kennedy becomes the designated driver and moral spokesperson for the Democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nachoman


Cuz he's French Canadian...


14 posted on 01/14/2006 7:49:37 PM PST by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: indcons
Another "surrender at all costs" article.

"Iran would be a far tougher country to try to attack than Iraq. It is three times as big and has highly motivated armed forces," a Foreign Office diplomat said yesterday.

The West, particularly the US, can take Iran down anytime it wants to. "Diplomats" have never understood solutions, let alone military solutions. At best they just perpetuate the unacceptable until it becomes a matter only the military can resolve.

15 posted on 01/14/2006 7:58:18 PM PST by DakotaGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

I will go and do it myself, how hard could it be.
Seriously.


16 posted on 01/14/2006 7:59:27 PM PST by Roverman2K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

We resigned ourselves to a nuclear Russia, China, France, etc....why not a Muslim nation?


17 posted on 01/14/2006 8:03:56 PM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachoman

...Frenchmen in the family woodpile maybe???


18 posted on 01/14/2006 8:04:25 PM PST by cavtrooper21 (No snappy tagline ideas available at this time... Please try again later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Good post. A sober assessment in my opinion. No one in the world would have the balls to attack Iran except GWB, and the Congress would crucify him if he did it on his own.

No way is Congress going to go along with a preemptive strike for a hundred reasons (cowardice chief among them).

Good to see you!

Atilla


19 posted on 01/14/2006 8:21:32 PM PST by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
One thing the Democrats have accomplished with their all-out assault on the use of force by the U.S....is that Iran will only be stopped or destroyed after they have used nuclear weapons.

They insist on splitting this nation, and have succeeded in doing so, leaving the half that sees the situation clearly with not enough political capital left to do much other than let their "Imagine"/Star Trek/Gandhi utopian pacifist vision fail as completely as Chamberlain failed 70 years ago.

This is the legacy of the 60's generation...the generation that now has the power to influence the actions of this nation.

We're not at the end of the world. But you can see it from here.

20 posted on 01/14/2006 8:35:19 PM PST by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson