Posted on 02/03/2006 1:31:35 PM PST by thierrya
They might fly planes into our buildings and murder innocent people.
State: "Muskrats, guarding their musk."?
And what makes the hottentot so hot?
If he tells us, we'll pass it on.
State Department spokesman Kurtis Cooper said ...
"We all fully recognize and respect freedom of the press and expression but it must be coupled with press responsibility. Inciting religious or ethnic hatreds in this manner is not acceptable."
WTF???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It is not for President Bush or SoS Rice or Kurtis Cooper to determine the extent of "acceptable" press freedom, nor can they enforce the coupling of "expression" with "responsibility".
And, why would anybody in the Federal government -- GWB included -- get upset about some foreigner offending Muslim sensibilities when the National Endowment of the Arts subsidizes blasphemy?
...winning the war on terror.
Whats so horrible about this story is how the State Dept could have contained this. THis all came about because the House of Faud was desperate to get the fact that again hundreds of pilgrams died during this year pilgrimage as well as about sixty in a hotel collapse and all of that could have been avoided if not for Saudi mismanagement. So they have their papers find cartoons in a Dutch paper four months before that no Moslem reads and inflames the issue to cover their butt. As usual the House of Saud couldnt contain the jeannie once it was out of the bottle. If someone had been paying attention at Foggy Bottom they could have nipped this in the bud with some phone calls to the Saudi Govt. THere is a cool Saudi Moslem guy that a blog called the Religious Policeman that has a hillarious take on this.
The Bush administration disagrees with you. They do not claim that WMD was found.
The State Department works for Condoleezza Rice.
She works for the President.
This fellow has stated that the US supports the Muslims.
Either he was talking out of turn, in which case there will be a public correction and he will be said to have been in error, or there will not be a public correction.
If there is not a public correction, then this is, in fact, the policy of President George Bush, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and the United States Government, and it is dishonest to slough off such an utterly gutless position on some underling flunky.
If there is no retraction, the buck stops with Bush.
Gee....I didn't know Condi had so much hair!
only when we become muslims, and not until then, will they not find reason to be offended
Sarin shell rigged as an IED, and several mustard gas shells say different.
Anyone with half a brain knows that.
However, the goal posts have been moved repeatedly, and what the MSM wants as proof is a working nuke foud in a crate labeled 'nuke'.
Thierrya is a U.S. bashing troll, and said they were leaving.
They posted this article to merely bash the U.S. again.
Precisely. I am very interested to see what Condi and Bush have to say about this matter.
Here is more --
President Bush decided Wednesday to waive any financial sanctions on Saudi Arabia, Washington's closest Arab ally in the war on terrorism, for failing to do enough to stop the modern-day slave trade in prostitutes, child sex workers and forced laborers.
In June, the State Department listed 14 countries as failing to adequately address trafficking problems, subjecting them all to possible sanctions if they did not crack down.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/n/a/2005/09/21/national/w184052D94.DTL&type=printable
I'm not proud of Pres Bush here.
This is hardly a surprise. We're negotiating all sorts of things with Islamic countries. What do folks expect the State Department to do, roll on the floor laughing at depictions of Muhammad that Muslims all over the world consider blasphemous?
I realize that many here on FR don't think there is any such thing as a decent Muslim, but I know that to be wrong.
The United States of America, under the leadership of President Bush, is not fighting a war against Islam. We are fighting a war against terrorism conducted in the name of Islam. At the same time we are doing that, we are attempting to convert two Islamic countries to a democratic form of government.
It is wrong to depict any religious leader or icon in a way that will be interpreted as blasphemy by those who follow that religion. There are many blasphemous images of Jesus on the web. Blasphemous images of deities or prophets is not the way to conduct affairs of state, so the State Department is correct to dissassociate itself with such images.
Short of leveling the entire Muslim part of the world, we must deal with Islam. We're obviously not going to do the former, so we must do the latter.
We even have a few million Muslim citizens of this country. They are citizens of the United States of America, the country that champions freedom of religion. The government of this nation will never engage in blasphemous portrayals of any religion. We are above that sort of nonsense.
President Bush is right. The State Department is right. We are not at war with Islam. We are trying to help Islamic countries become nations of democracy. If we are going to abandon that effort, then let's bring our troops home. If we're going to keep them there, then we are continuing to respect Islam as a religion.
The last time we had a spine was when RWR was presiding.
I personally wouldn't offend somebody else's religious beliefs. But freedom of speech in Denmark is a matter for the Danes. And I admire the Danes - they're a tolerant, freedom loving people, without bigotry as far as I know.
One of twelve cartoons posted on Michelle Malkin.
How about telling Muslims that they need to understand that our laws and cultural values allow the publication of such images without the creator or publisher being subject to prosecution or a fatwah?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.