Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: LdSentinal
You mean a conservative appointed conservatives? What a whacky idea!
2 posted on
02/07/2006 9:16:07 PM PST by
Holicheese
(Sold my house in MA. Another Yankee moving to NC!)
To: LdSentinal; Howlin
3 posted on
02/07/2006 9:17:51 PM PST by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: LdSentinal
Funny things happen when you win an election.
To: LdSentinal
Conservative judges will be Bush's legacy. Not a bad one to have but every judge now will be a real fight thanks to the darn Rinos.
6 posted on
02/07/2006 9:19:38 PM PST by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: LdSentinal
The best part is that he has almost three years to go.
7 posted on
02/07/2006 9:20:25 PM PST by
jazusamo
(A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
To: LdSentinal
8 posted on
02/07/2006 9:21:06 PM PST by
TheBigB
(Just got my SUPER BOWL CHAMPION PITTSBURGH STEELERS shirt..and there ain't an asterisk to be found!)
To: LdSentinal
To: LdSentinal
No matter what you think of Bush, ya gotta tank him for his appointments. And, hopefully, he'll get at least one more SCOTUS pick.
11 posted on
02/07/2006 9:24:23 PM PST by
umgud
(uncompassionate conservative)
To: LdSentinal
""Liberal" judges would generally seek in their rulings to extend the freedoms of abortion, gay rights, the rights of women and minorities and freedom of speech, Carp explained. "Conservative" jurists, by contrast, would prefer to limit such rights."
Let me guess. Carp is a lefty.
To: LdSentinal
"Liberal" judges would generally seek in their rulings to extend the freedoms of abortion, gay rights, the rights of women and minorities and freedom of speech, Carp explained. "Conservative" jurists, by contrast, would prefer to limit such rights. CORRECTION..."Liberal" judges would generally seek in their rulings to extend the freedoms of abortion, gay rights, the rights of women and minorities and freedom of speech, Carp explained. "Conservative" jurists, by contrast, would prefer to not make up rights and laws, properly leaving such fabrications to be handled by the legislature.
14 posted on
02/07/2006 9:27:42 PM PST by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: LdSentinal
I hope Harriet Miers gets her due in this; she has been instrumental in selecting this broad swath of conservative judges.
To: LdSentinal
Correct me if I'm wrong here TX freepers, but isn't Houston Texas' lib-tard bastion???
17 posted on
02/07/2006 9:30:07 PM PST by
stm
(It's possible to fix most things, but you can't fix stupid)
To: LdSentinal
Judges appointed by President George W. Bush are the most conservative on record when it comes to civil rights and liberties They say that like it's a bad thing.
18 posted on
02/07/2006 9:30:39 PM PST by
txroadkill
(Are you a Texas Freeper?? Click my handle to find out.)
To: LdSentinal
...the overall tone of the judiciary should be more conservative three years from now than it is todayYes! Hopefully that means fewer cases will be heard by the Supreme Court. The Supremes can spend their time overturning cases from the 9th circus.
20 posted on
02/07/2006 9:32:21 PM PST by
DuckFan4ever
(Defeat Kulongoski in '06.)
To: LdSentinal
"Liberal" judges would generally seek in their rulings to extend the freedoms of abortion, gay rights, the rights of women and minorities and freedom of speech, Carp explained. "Conservative" jurists, by contrast, would prefer to limit such rights. Odd; I thought "Liberal" judges would seek to expand the law by twisting the Constitution to conform to thier agenda, and "Conservative" judges would seek to contain the law within the strict limits of the Constitution.
An example would be "hate-speech crimes", where Liberals would limit freedom, by placing restrictions on the First Amendment; while Conservatives would expand (or maintain) freedom by insisting that "Congress shall make no law ...abridging the freedom of speech,..." means EXACTLY that.
21 posted on
02/07/2006 9:32:28 PM PST by
ApplegateRanch
(Mad-Mo! Allah bin Satan commands ye: Bow to him 5 times/day: Head down, @ss-up, and fart at Heaven!)
To: LdSentinal
"Liberal" judges would generally seek in their rulings to extend the freedoms of abortion, gay rights, the rights of women and minorities and freedom of speech, Carp explained. "Conservative" jurists, by contrast, would prefer to limit such rights. What is it that they say about "garbage in, garbage out"? The entire premise of this bogus study is faulty. They may have a useful definition of "Liberal judges", but true "Conservative judges" would not be ruling based on desired outcomes, but rather would be ruling based on the facts and the law.
22 posted on
02/07/2006 9:35:38 PM PST by
Zeppo
To: LdSentinal
In other news, blogger journalists tend to be much more conservative than the Media Insdustry that is 90% liberal.
Can't believe they wasted time and energy on this study.
23 posted on
02/07/2006 9:36:37 PM PST by
Fenris6
(3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
To: LdSentinal
Judges appointed by President George W. Bush are the most conservative on record when it comes to civil rights and liberties, according to a new study by a political science professor at the University of Houston. 
25 posted on
02/07/2006 9:38:43 PM PST by
SuziQ
To: LdSentinal
I'm glad I came upon this sentence.
The data on trial court decisions were taken from a database consisting of more than 75,0000 opinions published in the Federal Supplement by almost 1,800 judges from 1933 through the fall of 2005.
I guess the comparers didn't bother with the justices from the first 150 years of our country.
26 posted on
02/07/2006 9:42:54 PM PST by
syriacus
(President Eisenhower made sure that troops protected those who were desegregating Arkansas' schools)
To: LdSentinal
Funny how often these studies find what they're looking for!
27 posted on
02/07/2006 9:52:48 PM PST by
chb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
