Posted on 02/09/2006 8:10:43 AM PST by NYer
Didn't have time to read the whole thing but it is a must read. Check it out!
Thanks for the ping. If you find other relevant articles, you can ping DirtyHarryY2K and DBeers as they have taken over the Homosexual Agenda pinglist for a while.
Very good article. Will, on Will and Grace, is not real. It takes a heterosexual man to ACT like a "normal" homosexual man.
This is a great article. Thanks.
1. Create a storefront screen of "honest" books to fool decent but gullible people while masking their actual intent.
Fixed that for ya!
Yes, it's number 1. No doubt about it.
Bump and ping
Uh huh. You're as delusional as the gay guys, I guess.
A few years later Dom returned again for good. He had resolved to be celibate the rest of his life. He had utterly wearied of the crazy life and found there was no other available to him in that milieu. He had seen too many die of AIDS or lose their health to multible other diseases; too many suicides. He told me everybody over 30 knows one person who has killed himself. Dom knew nine. He had been raised as an atheist rationalist so he had no church to come back to. He is not pathetic as he has developed a social life of sorts. His friends are mostly women though he says he could never imagine going to bed with ne of them- it would be like homosexual or something. He shuns homosexual men and doesn't trust lesbians.He feels he wasted his life but at least doesn't think he has to ride that particular beast all the way into the ground.
Of all the articles I have read on this subject this man's is the most truthful and articulate. I am not and never have been homosexual. But circumstances in my life have (in the past) brought me into close proximity with homosexuals. What this man writes so eloquently is spot on. And his ultimate solution to his predicament is also exactly right. I pray God to bless this man and others like him who have faced their personal demons (and powerful demons they are) and are struggling to overcome them and find the grace and salvation that our God promises to all of us. He may be ashamed of his past but in facing up to it he is also showing a degree of courage not often encountered in the world today.
bump for later read
| Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1) |
| What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda |
| Myth and Reality about Homosexuality--Sexual Orientation Section, Guide to Family Issues |
I know a few. I work in a "creative" field, so gays just come with the territory. My boss, for one, has been with his partner for 20-some years.
Ping
But spiritual help, absolutely. And some ethical reinforcement. If you want to survive, you need to stop doing things which harm your own survival. And having anonymous sex would be way up the list of harmful acts to your survival.
Yes but how many on the side have they had. There is no such thing as a monogamous sodomite. They are either promiscuous, celibate, or dying.
If you question whether this is true or not, try rationalizing the statistics between pedophilia between male/male incidents and male/female incidents. Considering that 99% of the population is straight, pedophiles are closer to a 50/50 split which means that the percentage of those who are gay are somewhere on the order of 10 to 20 times more likely to be desirous of having sex with underaged partners. Just as a glaring example, where are all of the female victims of the Catholic priest sexual abuse cases? Is it just a coincidence that they all happened to like boys? I would wish that this weren't the case but I can't see any real analytical way to disprove it.
MUST READ!
A previous housemate was a professed and practicing homosexual. I say the latter because I got to know him well and became convinced that he was not really a homosexual at all. He had been engaged to a woman who dumped him and his mother was a paranoid schizophrenic. He was a mess who hated himself and thought he was not worthy of a woman's love since his fiance had dumped him and his mom was crazy. He actually had a female friend who fell in love with him, and even got him to sleep with her. He was incredibly promiscuous and went to all the bars. He used to love to come home and tell me who he saw at the bar (we lived in Washington, D.C. and you might be quite surprised at some of the names.) But he was one of the unhappiest people I have ever met. He eventually died of AIDS.
I have eight former friends who died of AIDS. When I look back on them, they were all the same, unhappy men who hated themselves. I have a close relative now who claims to be gay. He is 45 years old and still will not tell his parents. He has a "partner," but since he came out to some of us in the family he has been even more unhappy than he was before. He has gained weight, developed ulcers, and is generally a mess. He jumps from job to job thinking that will make him happier. I think he just hates himself and the homosexuality is a form of self-abuse.
I have concluded that there is no such thing as "homosexuality." Many people have sexual attractions and feelings of love for people of the same sex from time to time. This does not make one "homosexual." God designed human sexuality for one reason, to result in procreation and propagation of the human race. All people can find true happiness in this way with a partner of the opposite sex. Fulfilling only the transitory sexual attraction does not lead to true happiness. This is why so many "homosexuals" are unhappy and unfulfilled. Others who call themselves homosexuals are engaging in sex with same-sex partners strictly as a form of self-abuse, because they have deeper emotional problems.
In some ways, the Catholic Church had it right back in the old days in Ireland, when it was a sin to have sexual relations outside of marriage, and a sin to have it even with your spouse unless you were making a baby. The mistake was that the Church used only punitive measures to enforce this, and was too embarrassed and puritanical to teach people frankly about sexual desire and the importance and Godliness of overcoming it.
This is how it works. McNeill reinterprets the story of Sodom, claiming that it does not condemn homosexuality, but gang rape. Orthodox theologians respond, in a commendable but naïve attempt to rebut him, naïve because these theologians presume that McNeill believes his own arguments, and is writing as a scholar, not as a propagandist. McNeill ignores the arguments of his critics, dismissing their objections as based on homophobia, and repeats his original position. The orthodox respond again as if they were really dealing with a theologian. And back and forth for a few more rounds. Until finally McNeill or someone like him stands up and announces, "You know, this is getting us nowhere. We have our exegesis and our theology. You have yours. Why can't we just agree to disagree?" That sounds so reasonable, so ecumenical. And if the orthodox buy into it, they have lost, because the gay rights apologists have earned a place at the table from which they will never be dislodged. Getting at the truth about Sodom and Gomorrah, or correctly parsing the sexual ethics of St. Thomas, was never really the issue. Winning admittance to Holy Communion was the issue.
Forewarned is forearmed.
brutal honesty
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.