It seems quite obvious to my read and from previous comments that the arrangement in stores such as that are intentionally done to both present one "public" personna about the places and to secondly present the reality "hidden" from public view. It implies secondary access for secondary purpose and, in effect, yes, a conspiracy in that regard.
All the word, "conspiracy" MEANS is that two or more persons collaborate for purposes of agreing to work concertedly toward a goal. Go look up the word.
It doesn't necessarily involve wire tappings and aliens invasions, and such. It can be as banal a thing as pornography shops pretending to be bookstores, just as described. I know that many video stores behave similarly, if and when they have pornography sections, hiding them in the back...which people only know about when they have some purpose that involves the section, so to speak.
The only reason I know about the one in a local video stores is I once saw someone I knew who literally was "sneaking" in the back around some hidden shelves and it pretty well broadcasted what he was doing and why. Up to then, I actually thought that there were dedicated and separate video stores for that. Surprise, there aren't.
As to homosexual pornography, I haven't a clue. But this guy's story seems accurate (the article) and, from my own surprise awareness about the local store, I'm sure that pornography for homosexuals is equally somewhat covertly available by merchants.
The point of the article, however, about this one point, is that he's describing merchants that are dedicated homosexual-fare purveyors. Not like it's Blockbuster or Tower, but actual shops that exist for that mere purpose (homosexual pornography) with moreorless "storefront" deflections to avoid making their actual purpose highly visible.
So, yes, in that sense, within the context of the homosexual agenda, a cultural sense, yes, merchants of that sort are involved in CONSPIRING to conceal their wares. Thus, conspiracy.
The problem comes when he goes beyond that. As I read along, I'd see these things that are congruent with my own understanding, and then all of a sudden he's pushing in a conspiracy angle -- as if the normal human failings were not enough to explain how homosexuals have been successful at spreading their creed.
As with Lobo's -- it's not enough for it to be a brown paper wrapper; no, the owners of Lobo's are instead agents of The Agenda, putting out serious bucks to Further The Agenda. It's too much -- and not believable.
Further, I simply don't believe his claim that "nobody" bought any real books at the store. It's too convenient.