[AnnoyedOne]

Pure Creationism does not hold up to scientific scrutiny.. and niether does pure Darwinism. If God is completely discredited due to that.. then so is Darwin.

ID is a theory that both are correct, just not completely correct. You have proven to me only that you know little of ID or Darwinism.

[Central Scrutiniser]

Evolution does hold up to scientific scrutiny, its a theory that is tested every time there is new data, that is how the scientific method works. ID is not testable, it is not science, it is a dogmatic belief that has no place in a science class. You wanna teach it? Teach it in your church.

[Dimensio]

ID is a theory that both are correct, just not completely correct. You have proven to me only that you know little of ID or Darwinism.

I was not aware of this. My understanding of ID, as taught by its major proponents, is that common descent occured, but throughout the process an unspecified "designer" of unspecified origin and nature used an unspecified method to "design" certain specific physical features that could not have evolved without such intervention. If this is an incomplete understanding, please direct me to references that better explain ID.