Skip to comments.
Saddam General: Newsweek Translation of Saddam Tapes Wrong
The Reality Check ^
| March 23, 2006
| Jim Kouri, CPP
Posted on 03/24/2006 5:32:03 AM PST by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: Kaslin
Saddam has been saying in public that he has NOT had WMD since 1990. Finding an audio where he states that or a document where he states that, is NOT even news. What is news are documents or audios where he states he HAD them or MADE them. If Saddam had been telling the public the truth, there should be NO documents or audios where he states he HAD or MADE WMD. Unfortunately for the MSM and its followers, we have found them. Some are excerpted and posted on FreeRepublic. In the documents translated on Leavenworths site so far either Saddam or someone in his presence has admitted the following.
Iraq Produced Biological Weapons
Iraq Produced Chemical Weapons
Iraq had an Extensive Nuclear Program
Iraq used Chemcial WMD on Kurds
Iraq used Chemical WMD on Iranians
Iraq Concealed Info from the UN
Iraq Lied to the UN
Iraq Stalled the UN
And that is within just the first couple hundred documents.
To: Kaslin
Oh yeah! That'll work well.
An "independent body with no ax to grind"
Better exclude mooselimbs!
22
posted on
03/24/2006 6:15:14 AM PST
by
Roccus
To: Kaslin
No the liberal media changed the truth. Who would ever believe it? /sarcasm
23
posted on
03/24/2006 6:18:11 AM PST
by
bmwcyle
(We got permits, yes we DO! We got permits, how 'bout YOU?;))
To: Old Sarge
24
posted on
03/24/2006 6:23:27 AM PST
by
woofie
To: Kaslin
Was the CIA always this pathetic? Or is this a rather recent occurrence?
25
posted on
03/24/2006 6:26:20 AM PST
by
beeler
("When you’re running down my country, Hoss you’re walking on the fighting side of me.")
To: OldFriend
It wasn't long ago that Newsweek (Isikoff) was reporting the Muslim Brotherhood was dead. And then there were elections in Egypt and the West Bank/Gaza that proved the organization was alive and kicking.
26
posted on
03/24/2006 6:26:39 AM PST
by
gaspar
To: Kaslin; woofie; OldFriend
27
posted on
03/24/2006 6:27:23 AM PST
by
Old Sarge
(My vigor to fight has been renewed.)
To: reformedliberal
Yet most of the 2 million documents have not been explored or even translated. Its almost as if the CIA and the Pentagon dont want to know what they contain. It is only a matter of time until these documents reveal the names of CIA, DOD, Congressmen, State Department officials and U.S. businessmen who were complicit in Saddam's reign of terror. Of course there is no institutional interest in translating these documents.
28
posted on
03/24/2006 6:28:11 AM PST
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Self appointed RNC Press Secretary for Smarmy Sound Bites.)
To: Old Sarge
Gee, Sarge, do ya' think Newsweak would "mistakenly" misinterpret documents that show the Bush Administration was right? We here know they were correct in launching into Iraq, because we have knowledge the MSM doesn't through legwork literally worldwide. This is in keeping with the MSM's near-orgasmic drive to discredit and undermine GWB, as a mouthpiece for the DNC and the democrat party.
29
posted on
03/24/2006 6:30:18 AM PST
by
astounded
(We don't need no stinkin' rules of engagement...)
To: Kaslin
Others believe Newsweek may have a vested interest in perpetuating the story that Iraq had no WMD. YA THINK!!!????!!!
30
posted on
03/24/2006 6:31:11 AM PST
by
RightWingAtheist
( EveningStar is back; new tagline pending)
To: Roccus
An "independent body with no ax to grind" How about the Mossad? :-)
31
posted on
03/24/2006 6:33:26 AM PST
by
maryz
To: Aquinasfan
Fox might mention something. Steve Doocy was talking about the released Iraqi documents this morning and mentioned a US Army website where some of the translated documents can be viewed. I failed to write down the address, but it had something to do with Army Foriegn studies or something to that affect.
Anybody else see this and have a link?
To: Aquinasfan
Fox has become a gossip channel it sucks. They are busy with the pastor and his wife these days.
33
posted on
03/24/2006 6:37:33 AM PST
by
angcat
To: gov_bean_ counter
Actually, I believe two Britains are named in one document I downloaded from the Leavenworth site. They are referred to as Iraqi friendly journalist if memory serves me right. I wont post their names here however.
To: Old Sarge
There is still a magazine called Newsweek? I thought that mag went down the tubes last year?
35
posted on
03/24/2006 6:57:19 AM PST
by
Mathews
(Shot... Splash... Out!)
To: justa-hairyape
Thanks. Tip of the iceberg, IMO.
36
posted on
03/24/2006 6:58:21 AM PST
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Self appointed RNC Press Secretary for Smarmy Sound Bites.)
To: gaspar
Between the America haters buried in our institutions by the likes of Carter and Clinton and the America haters opening rooting against America in the media, we need to be praying more than ever for divine intervention.
The deck is stacked against us and our soldiers need our support.
37
posted on
03/24/2006 7:01:34 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(HELL IS TOO GOOD FOR OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA)
To: maryz
Although I like that idea, do you really think that they don't have an ax to grind?
38
posted on
03/24/2006 7:03:06 AM PST
by
Roccus
To: Kaslin
Doesn't surprise me. In this country we don't know what the meaning of IS is.
To: Kaslin
KEEP THIS ONE HOT! Thanks for the post.
Today's MSM - if we don't lie to you, who will?....
40
posted on
03/24/2006 7:19:38 AM PST
by
Amalie
(FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson