Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam General: Newsweek Translation of Saddam Tapes Wrong
The Reality Check ^ | March 23, 2006 | Jim Kouri, CPP

Posted on 03/24/2006 5:32:03 AM PST by Kaslin

Former Iraqi Air Force Gen. Georges Sada claims that Newsweek's translation of some of Saddam Hussein's tapes is wrong. Newsweek reported that the Saddam tapes include statements that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Speaking on Fox News Channel, General Sada said that the tapes were not translated correctly and his translation is that Saddam Hussein did have WMD. Why would Newsweek publish an erroneous story? Sada believes they used unqualified translators who confused Arab dialects. Others believe Newsweek may have a vested interest in perpetuating the story that Iraq had no WMD.

General Sada also says that chemical or biological weapons were flown to Syria in 56 flights, but was unable to confirm it.

General Sada's allegations are confirmed by others. A Pentagon official, John A. Shaw, who was responsible for keeping track of Iraq’s weapons programs, claims that special Russian troops in civilian clothes supervised the transfer of Saddam’s WMDs into Syria. An Israeli general, Moshe Yaalon, has made a similar claim. The general in charge of Pentagon spy satellites has admitted observing large truck convoys from Iraq to Syria before the war began.

Yet most of the 2 million documents have not been explored or even translated. It’s almost as if the CIA and the Pentagon don’t want to know what they contain.

According to the Boston Herald, the CIA’s clandestine war against the White House means the agency cannot be trusted for an honest account of what’s in this material.

Many believe that Congress should make sure that an independent body, with no ax to grind, checks the documents and releases every last one that can be made public safely.


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: corruption; iraq; media; mediabias; msm; prewardocs; waronterror; wmds; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 03/24/2006 5:32:04 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Others believe Newsweek may have a vested interest in perpetuating the story that Iraq had no WMD.

DING-DING-DING!

The WINNAH!

2 posted on 03/24/2006 5:33:35 AM PST by Old Sarge (My vigor to fight has been renewed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So, how much publicity is this story going to get?


3 posted on 03/24/2006 5:35:48 AM PST by nuconvert ([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
So, how much publicity is this story going to get?

Fox might mention something.

4 posted on 03/24/2006 5:40:48 AM PST by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan

Another Dan Rather moment?


5 posted on 03/24/2006 5:42:02 AM PST by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bookmaestro

ping


6 posted on 03/24/2006 5:44:46 AM PST by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez; onyx; ohioWfan; Texasforever; BigSkyFreeper; Tamzee; mrs tiggywinkle; Dog; ...
Others believe Newsweek may have a vested interest in perpetuating the story that Iraq had no WMD.

Kind of makes a person go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

7 posted on 03/24/2006 5:45:03 AM PST by Mo1 ("Stupidity is also a gift from God, but it should not be abused." Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Well this is a shock...


8 posted on 03/24/2006 5:46:08 AM PST by EmilyGeiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
I saw a portion of this on FNC, so that is some coverage. ABC is reporting on this, too. So the other outlets are going to have to compete.

This quote: the CIA’s clandestine war against the White House means the agency cannot be trusted for an honest account of what’s in this material. is, IMO, very news worthy. It is provocative. Someone who wants to make sure they stay employed w/a byline should investigate this. In any event, the media has succeeded in making themselves the story, which must be uncomfortable for them, not to mention very poor journalism. Perhaps they will realize it would be good for them to change the subject about now.

Sada is selling a book. I hope he has a good PR agent. A news conference would be nice.
9 posted on 03/24/2006 5:47:58 AM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Trusting Newsweak could be deadly dangerous to your health.

Wasn't that long ago they were confirming the flushing of a toilet at Guantanamo.

10 posted on 03/24/2006 5:51:46 AM PST by OldFriend (HELL IS TOO GOOD FOR OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight
I doubt anyone at the major networks speaks Arabic well enough to stage a Dan Rather moment. I think it's more like the way the Prussians manipulated the wording of an intercepted document to keep the British out of the Franco-Prussian War.
11 posted on 03/24/2006 5:51:53 AM PST by .cnI redruM ("Brother, you can believe in stones, as long as you don't throw them at me. - W. Sultan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Trusting Newsweak could be deadly dangerous to your health.

Wasn't that long ago they were confirming the flushing of a koran in the toilet at Guantanamo.

12 posted on 03/24/2006 5:52:07 AM PST by OldFriend (HELL IS TOO GOOD FOR OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
This quote: the CIA’s clandestine war against the White House

That statement is...odd.
13 posted on 03/24/2006 5:53:32 AM PST by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Everybody remember who was the one who wanted the cia hiring to be people of liberal quality. Yes, this always goes back to ol Clintie and his screwball commie wife. They are the ones who revamped the cia. Clinton made another mess. We now have a cia that can't catch a cat in a garbage can looking for old fish , and if someone else does, claim the cat was abused. Every thing goes back to the mess Clinton and his pro communist friends like kerry have done in the past . But of course, blame it on Bush and don't believe one of the guys who are sitting right next to Saddam , after all only Clinton and his liberals are right.


14 posted on 03/24/2006 5:55:26 AM PST by betsyross1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

I find it difficult to believe that some young energetic newman isn't digging into this thoroughly. The one that would come up with an honest, valid interpretation of what was what surely would make a name for himslf the envy of the profession.


15 posted on 03/24/2006 5:56:20 AM PST by sinbad17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Yet most of the 2 million documents have not been explored or even translated.

The vast majority of government documents are totally meaningless, retained only because it's easier to store everything than to make a decision on what to discard. That applies as much to the former Iraqi government as it does to our own.

When we got these documents, we took everything we could find, even the purchase orders for pens and paper. To say these documents have not been "explored" is probably a misstatement. More likely, a screening process has taken place so that the translation effort concentrates on documents that are more likely to have important contents.

16 posted on 03/24/2006 5:56:24 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
More SLIMY reporting by MSM but this time it is not the NY Slimes (Times), but Newsweek.

Maybe they hired fired people from the NY Slimes at Newsweek.

Maybe someone should test the toll free/800 number at Newsweek to see if they know how to answer the phone...

17 posted on 03/24/2006 6:04:35 AM PST by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Sorry, but if Sadam showed which rock the WMD are hidden under, the MSM would procame " Sadam Lies!!!"


18 posted on 03/24/2006 6:07:54 AM PST by newcthem (Use Allah urinal cakes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
In any event, the media has succeeded in making themselves the story, which must be uncomfortable for them, not to mention very poor journalism.

One thing the media always wants to be is "hip" and "cutting-edge" and I get the feeling they're sloooooowly beginning to realize that, by parroting the moonbattery of old hippies (which is the vast majority of the liberal anti-war fanatics), they are more and more being perceived as about as cutting-edge as Bob Schieffer. They're about the last bunch to realize it is the liberals they've put their stock in who have become the strident, constipated "Establishment."

19 posted on 03/24/2006 6:09:53 AM PST by JennysCool (Liberals don't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Chena; Valin; M. Thatcher; DocRock; Calpernia; Madame Dufarge; Txsleuth; Peach; SwatTeam; ..
Saddam General: Newsweek Translation of Saddam Tapes Wrong

Release/Translation of Classified PreWar Docs ping. If you want to be added or removed to the ping list, please Freepmail me.

Please add the keyword prewardocs to any articles pertaining to this subject.

Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents

Also here

Documents from the Harmony Database

20 posted on 03/24/2006 6:12:09 AM PST by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson