1 posted on
03/24/2006 5:32:04 AM PST by
Kaslin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Kaslin
Others believe Newsweek may have a vested interest in perpetuating the story that Iraq had no WMD. DING-DING-DING!
The WINNAH!
2 posted on
03/24/2006 5:33:35 AM PST by
Old Sarge
(My vigor to fight has been renewed.)
To: Kaslin
So, how much publicity is this story going to get?
3 posted on
03/24/2006 5:35:48 AM PST by
nuconvert
([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
To: Bookmaestro
6 posted on
03/24/2006 5:44:46 AM PST by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: pinz-n-needlez; onyx; ohioWfan; Texasforever; BigSkyFreeper; Tamzee; mrs tiggywinkle; Dog; ...
Others believe Newsweek may have a vested interest in perpetuating the story that Iraq had no WMD. Kind of makes a person go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
7 posted on
03/24/2006 5:45:03 AM PST by
Mo1
("Stupidity is also a gift from God, but it should not be abused." Pope John Paul II)
To: Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Trusting Newsweak could be deadly dangerous to your health.
Wasn't that long ago they were confirming the flushing of a toilet at Guantanamo.
10 posted on
03/24/2006 5:51:46 AM PST by
OldFriend
(HELL IS TOO GOOD FOR OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA)
To: Kaslin
Trusting Newsweak could be deadly dangerous to your health.
Wasn't that long ago they were confirming the flushing of a koran in the toilet at Guantanamo.
12 posted on
03/24/2006 5:52:07 AM PST by
OldFriend
(HELL IS TOO GOOD FOR OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA)
To: Kaslin
Everybody remember who was the one who wanted the cia hiring to be people of liberal quality. Yes, this always goes back to ol Clintie and his screwball commie wife. They are the ones who revamped the cia. Clinton made another mess. We now have a cia that can't catch a cat in a garbage can looking for old fish , and if someone else does, claim the cat was abused. Every thing goes back to the mess Clinton and his pro communist friends like kerry have done in the past . But of course, blame it on Bush and don't believe one of the guys who are sitting right next to Saddam , after all only Clinton and his liberals are right.
To: Kaslin
Yet most of the 2 million documents have not been explored or even translated.The vast majority of government documents are totally meaningless, retained only because it's easier to store everything than to make a decision on what to discard. That applies as much to the former Iraqi government as it does to our own.
When we got these documents, we took everything we could find, even the purchase orders for pens and paper. To say these documents have not been "explored" is probably a misstatement. More likely, a screening process has taken place so that the translation effort concentrates on documents that are more likely to have important contents.
16 posted on
03/24/2006 5:56:24 AM PST by
Fresh Wind
(Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
To: Kaslin
More SLIMY reporting by MSM but this time it is not the NY Slimes (Times), but Newsweek.
Maybe they hired fired people from the NY Slimes at Newsweek.
Maybe someone should test the toll free/800 number at Newsweek to see if they know how to answer the phone...
17 posted on
03/24/2006 6:04:35 AM PST by
topher
(Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
To: Kaslin
Sorry, but if Sadam showed which rock the WMD are hidden under, the MSM would procame " Sadam Lies!!!"
18 posted on
03/24/2006 6:07:54 AM PST by
newcthem
(Use Allah urinal cakes!)
To: Kaslin; Chena; Valin; M. Thatcher; DocRock; Calpernia; Madame Dufarge; Txsleuth; Peach; SwatTeam; ..
To: Kaslin
Saddam has been saying in public that he has NOT had WMD since 1990. Finding an audio where he states that or a document where he states that, is NOT even news. What is news are documents or audios where he states he HAD them or MADE them. If Saddam had been telling the public the truth, there should be NO documents or audios where he states he HAD or MADE WMD. Unfortunately for the MSM and its followers, we have found them. Some are excerpted and posted on FreeRepublic. In the documents translated on Leavenworths site so far either Saddam or someone in his presence has admitted the following.
Iraq Produced Biological Weapons
Iraq Produced Chemical Weapons
Iraq had an Extensive Nuclear Program
Iraq used Chemcial WMD on Kurds
Iraq used Chemical WMD on Iranians
Iraq Concealed Info from the UN
Iraq Lied to the UN
Iraq Stalled the UN
And that is within just the first couple hundred documents.
To: Kaslin
Oh yeah! That'll work well.
An "independent body with no ax to grind"
Better exclude mooselimbs!
22 posted on
03/24/2006 6:15:14 AM PST by
Roccus
To: Kaslin
No the liberal media changed the truth. Who would ever believe it? /sarcasm
23 posted on
03/24/2006 6:18:11 AM PST by
bmwcyle
(We got permits, yes we DO! We got permits, how 'bout YOU?;))
To: Kaslin
Was the CIA always this pathetic? Or is this a rather recent occurrence?
25 posted on
03/24/2006 6:26:20 AM PST by
beeler
("When you’re running down my country, Hoss you’re walking on the fighting side of me.")
To: Kaslin; woofie; OldFriend
27 posted on
03/24/2006 6:27:23 AM PST by
Old Sarge
(My vigor to fight has been renewed.)
To: Kaslin
Others believe Newsweek may have a vested interest in perpetuating the story that Iraq had no WMD. YA THINK!!!????!!!
30 posted on
03/24/2006 6:31:11 AM PST by
RightWingAtheist
( EveningStar is back; new tagline pending)
To: Kaslin
Doesn't surprise me. In this country we don't know what the meaning of IS is.
To: Kaslin
KEEP THIS ONE HOT! Thanks for the post.
Today's MSM - if we don't lie to you, who will?....
40 posted on
03/24/2006 7:19:38 AM PST by
Amalie
(FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
