Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meeting Doctor Doom [Top scientist advocates eliminating 90% of population for ecology]
The Citizen Scientist ^ | 3/31/2006 | Forest M. Mimms III

Posted on 04/02/2006 4:48:49 PM PDT by Star Traveler

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: GreenFreeper
Eco Ping! ...gays, minorities, womyn and chil'dren, hardest hit....Its G.W. Bush Fault. :D
41 posted on 04/02/2006 7:04:35 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you....... :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
No doubt there's a list of the attendees and speakers. The FBI should get on this one right away.

It's not like they have to wait until they get a profile together either.

42 posted on 04/02/2006 7:06:30 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

I very strongly agree.

I think the Univ President should be inundated with suggestions that the famous idiot be nominated as the first 'volunteer' toward population reduction.

I wonder how the puppet masters found him, wound him up and set him loose. He's made-to-order for them and their goals.

Hideous.


43 posted on 04/02/2006 8:07:44 PM PDT by Quix (PRAY AND WORK WHILE THERE'S DAY! Many very dark nights are looming. Thankfully, God is still God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Thank God there are still some sane grown-ups like Forrest Mims to stand up to this humanity-hating lunacy.


44 posted on 04/03/2006 12:31:00 AM PDT by TheSarce (The Silent Majority is finding its voice. It goes to ELEVEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

"World population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day." Jacques Cousteau, 1991


45 posted on 04/03/2006 12:44:07 AM PDT by endthematrix (None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

ah yes...and so the new nazis appear...of course he is in the 10%, he must be to lead the new vorld order!!! yes mein furher!!! /end sarc

he loves the world so much he doesnt want mankind to dirty it...imagine this guys mind ...and tell me the same poison that existed in 1930's germany is not alive and well in the ecology movements..

more dr strangelove then dr doom..


46 posted on 04/03/2006 1:15:32 AM PDT by Irishguy (How do ya LIKE THOSE APPLES!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
You said -- "Sounds like this was an assclown instead of a scientific convention. I wonder if all the people clapping for this pinhead realized he wants 9 out 10 of them dead...." My guess is that he would give them an *exception* and that they *know this*. Therefore, they're talking about all these other people (the 90%) as if they are all "bacteria".

Somewhere in hell, Hitler is smiling.

Vhen Herr Docktor says, “We ist der Master Race!” Ve "Heil!" Ve "Heil!" right in Herr Docktor's face . . . .

And the science community wonders why it has such a poor public image.

47 posted on 04/03/2006 2:00:39 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Hey, I "got" it!


48 posted on 04/03/2006 5:34:29 AM PDT by Desert_Girl (I love deadlines; I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

You said -- "I question the designation "Top Scientist". This is just some schmoe with a bid for notoriety."

Of course, I was merely indicating what was given in that article and seemingly the opinions of "other top scientists" too. It appears to be their opinion.

Now..., to minimize his credentials and say he's just a "nut case" actually diminishes the seriousness of this particular situation. It's like saying about the guy who is sitting on the bus, talking to an empty seat -- "Well, he's a nut case and I can ignore him."

The problem is (here) is that he's apparently not a nut case. He's credentialed; he's teaching hundreds and thousands of students (giving them the same philosophy); he's recognized by other so-called "top scientists".

Therefore, I think calling him a nutcase does a disservice to the real problem here. What we're seeing here is the *actual fruit* of the idea of "Evolution" and it's ultimate outcome, when people are really "serious" about this anti-God philosophy.

"Evolution" is a false and deceptive and destructive philosophy and needs to be fought against and -- in its place -- we need to put in the true philosophy of the Bible, in that God created mankind as told in Genesis (not as in the "evolutionary theory" which gives lizards equal moral footing with man).

We see the end results (of thinking -- and eventually *action*) of really believing the "evolutionary theory" and being "anti-God" and anti-Bible.

So, no -- I don't think he's a "nutcase" -- but rather someone who is following his "evolutionary theories" to their *true conclusions*.

The problem here -- is -- that the Evolutionary theory is absolutely false -- and he's willing to gather a following of people committed to killing off 90% of the humans on the planet -- because of this theory of "science".

Regards,
Star Traveler


49 posted on 04/03/2006 7:08:44 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: YOUGOTIT

You said -- "This is not new! However they always say someone else should be eliminated and not themselves. If these left-wing anti-humans want to eliminate the human race they should start with ????? The world would be better off without anti-humans."

Well, it's not new -- the philosophy that comes from being anti-God and against what the truth of Scriptures say. In the first chapter of Romans, it tells about those deceived in their own deceptions.

However, at the present time..., those kinds of people seem to be gaining ground and may very well *act* upon their anti-God and "pro-evolutionary theories" -- to the point of releasing (accidently) some of these active organisms to kill off the human race. Perhaps some scientists have already done that and that's why we have some of these strange and virulent diseases. Perhaps we'll be seeing more of them from these kinds of scientists.

Regards,
Star Traveler


50 posted on 04/03/2006 7:13:00 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Have you noticed he has not started with himself?


51 posted on 04/03/2006 7:17:27 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcar
You said -- "Isn't he the chairman of the Voluntary Human Extinction Society, with 3000 worldwide members and shrinking annually?"

I had not heard of them, so I looked it up and briefly scanned some information.

Now..., let me tell you that Western Society has already agreed to the proposition. We're already "minimally breeding" ourselves out of existence. AND, the Muslims are there, breeding themselves into *takeover* of the whole world.

Therefore, what I see happening is simply that these guys (of that particular group) are simply helping the Muslims more quickly institute Sharia law in all the countries that they become majorities in.

It seems that the Western World is intent on committing suicide. They're doing a good job of it.

Regards,
Star Traveler
52 posted on 04/03/2006 7:19:16 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

What's really interesting about psychotics like Pianka is that they undoubtedly think of themselves as being among the lucky 10% who will survive.


53 posted on 04/03/2006 7:29:17 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Screamname

Just quoting a small section of Carlin -- "Besides, there is nothing wrong with the planet. Nothing wrong with the planet. The planet is fine. The PEOPLE are f***ed."

Well..., in generaly, he's spouting off the same kind of stuff that this scientist is. So, what we see -- is in different areas of our society (from scientist to comedian and all in-between) -- we've got this same anti-God, anti-Biblical and anti-human philosophy being integrated into everything that we do. This is nothing but a Satanic deception on a very grand scale.

The Bible calls these people all fools.

From what God says in the Bible is that yes, people are the problem and that's why the whole "creation" was put into bondage and decay -- because of sin that is inherent in mankind (from the beginning -- in Genesis). And what the Bible gives is not a solution that we must kill off 90% of society to solve the problem -- No! The solution that God gives us -- is simply that we admit our sin and accept what God's Son, Jesus Christ has done in providing for our *invidual* salvation -- out of this terrible mess that we and the world is in (which involves all of "creation" too).

And, at the chosen time (according to God's plan) -- Jesus Christ will come back and set things straight. God says that mankind will not be the one to set things straight. However, the answer is not "kill mankind" (because God has acted in order to *save it*). The answer is simply -- Jesus Christ and following Him.

However, from Carlin to Pianka -- their answer is not Jesus Christ -- but the deception of Satan which is nothing more than *destruction* of humans. That's the goal of Satan -- destruction.

Regards,
Star Traveler


54 posted on 04/03/2006 7:30:11 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

You said -- "What's really interesting about psychotics like Pianka is that they undoubtedly think of themselves as being among the lucky 10% who will survive."

Undoubtedly, he (or others like him) would like to work on perfecting that killing rate -- and then -- also develop a serum for protecting those who *deserve* to be the remaining ones.

So, he's probably thinking of protecting himself and others like him.




However, I would like to say something about that term (and other terms like it) -- "psychotics".

That kind of terminology sort of dismisses the seriousness of the whole matter. I think these people are serious and -- apart from those kinds of deviant theories -- if you or I were to talk to him, we would probably think he was no different than anyone else that lives in our own neighborhoods.

The problem here -- is that he's got a *theory* that *stems directly from Evolutionary Theory* -- in that we deserve no more right to live than a bacteria. If he's *serious* about that theory -- he *has to* come to this conclusion. It's not "psychotic" -- it's simply an outgrowth of an *anti-God" and "anti-Biblical" theory. This is simply the *results* of that.

When the world *abandons* the truth of God -- this is what you get. It's not "psychotic" -- it's no more than being committed to the philosophy that Satan would have mankind believe -- "evolution" -- instead of being created by God. That's the real problem -- not a "psychosis".

Regards,
Star Traveler


55 posted on 04/03/2006 7:37:58 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

You said -- "At some point in time some of them are going to get together and try out their "ideas". "

I do believe this is what will happen. It will be the results of them (and others like them) believing in the anti-God and anti-Biblical ideas (like Evolution) -- which then means that we *really* have *no basis* to be any better than bacteria (like that scientist says). He's right -- if Evolution is true. There is no basis for our higher moral standing -- at all. (Of course, against that, I believe what God has said -- from Genesis to Revelation).

Now, in Revelation -- we see the *results* of what these guys are saying now. How come there are so many diseases and so many people being killed by famines and diseases (not to say anything about the wars indicated)?

Well, it very well can be (and probably will be) that these scientists are contributing to elminating the human race. As far as I know, they may have already engaged in it and we are seeing these results now.

What we see in the book of Revelation will be happening and these diseases which will be killing millions upon millions of people may very well be from some of these kinds of scientists.

Regards,
Star Traveler


56 posted on 04/03/2006 7:48:07 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
That kind of terminology sort of dismisses the seriousness of the whole matter.

Not at all. I take this guy very seriously.

While I agree with your larger point (that he has cast off conventional morality), I still say that he's "psychotic" in the dictionary sense of the term: "fundamental mental derangement (as schizophrenia) characterized by defective or lost contact with reality."

Psychotics can be very high-functioning, as this fellow obviously is, and they can also be very charismatic -- as this fellow obviously is. That's why they're so dangerous.

57 posted on 04/03/2006 7:48:29 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Screamname

It's been a long time since Carlin grabbed my attention.

THis is right on, although I preferred the period when Carlin was the Hippy-Dippy Weatherman.

His heart attack changed his whole outlook on life and negatively affected his wonderful humor.

Shame.


58 posted on 04/03/2006 7:57:56 AM PDT by Beckwith (The liberal media has picked sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

You said -- "Certainly a death wish for 90% of the population qualifies as over-the-top big, as such things go.

Make sense now?"

Ahhh..., I see. Well, I guess my "Texas-size" comments were limited to "Jackalopes" or something like that. :-)

Regards,
Star Traveler


59 posted on 04/03/2006 10:17:03 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
Evolution is as factually based as any scientific doctrine there is. It is based, in part, upon the survival of the fittest, not general random destruction of human life like this schmoe is suggesting.

Here's a tip, if non-scientists haven't heard of him before, he's not a "top Scientist". He's one among many trying to make a name for himself.

60 posted on 04/03/2006 1:59:49 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson