Posted on 04/02/2006 4:48:49 PM PDT by Star Traveler
It's not like they have to wait until they get a profile together either.
I very strongly agree.
I think the Univ President should be inundated with suggestions that the famous idiot be nominated as the first 'volunteer' toward population reduction.
I wonder how the puppet masters found him, wound him up and set him loose. He's made-to-order for them and their goals.
Hideous.
Thank God there are still some sane grown-ups like Forrest Mims to stand up to this humanity-hating lunacy.
"World population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day." Jacques Cousteau, 1991
ah yes...and so the new nazis appear...of course he is in the 10%, he must be to lead the new vorld order!!! yes mein furher!!! /end sarc
he loves the world so much he doesnt want mankind to dirty it...imagine this guys mind ...and tell me the same poison that existed in 1930's germany is not alive and well in the ecology movements..
more dr strangelove then dr doom..
Somewhere in hell, Hitler is smiling.
Vhen Herr Docktor says, We ist der Master Race! Ve "Heil!" Ve "Heil!" right in Herr Docktor's face . . . .
And the science community wonders why it has such a poor public image.
Hey, I "got" it!
You said -- "I question the designation "Top Scientist". This is just some schmoe with a bid for notoriety."
Of course, I was merely indicating what was given in that article and seemingly the opinions of "other top scientists" too. It appears to be their opinion.
Now..., to minimize his credentials and say he's just a "nut case" actually diminishes the seriousness of this particular situation. It's like saying about the guy who is sitting on the bus, talking to an empty seat -- "Well, he's a nut case and I can ignore him."
The problem is (here) is that he's apparently not a nut case. He's credentialed; he's teaching hundreds and thousands of students (giving them the same philosophy); he's recognized by other so-called "top scientists".
Therefore, I think calling him a nutcase does a disservice to the real problem here. What we're seeing here is the *actual fruit* of the idea of "Evolution" and it's ultimate outcome, when people are really "serious" about this anti-God philosophy.
"Evolution" is a false and deceptive and destructive philosophy and needs to be fought against and -- in its place -- we need to put in the true philosophy of the Bible, in that God created mankind as told in Genesis (not as in the "evolutionary theory" which gives lizards equal moral footing with man).
We see the end results (of thinking -- and eventually *action*) of really believing the "evolutionary theory" and being "anti-God" and anti-Bible.
So, no -- I don't think he's a "nutcase" -- but rather someone who is following his "evolutionary theories" to their *true conclusions*.
The problem here -- is -- that the Evolutionary theory is absolutely false -- and he's willing to gather a following of people committed to killing off 90% of the humans on the planet -- because of this theory of "science".
Regards,
Star Traveler
You said -- "This is not new! However they always say someone else should be eliminated and not themselves. If these left-wing anti-humans want to eliminate the human race they should start with ????? The world would be better off without anti-humans."
Well, it's not new -- the philosophy that comes from being anti-God and against what the truth of Scriptures say. In the first chapter of Romans, it tells about those deceived in their own deceptions.
However, at the present time..., those kinds of people seem to be gaining ground and may very well *act* upon their anti-God and "pro-evolutionary theories" -- to the point of releasing (accidently) some of these active organisms to kill off the human race. Perhaps some scientists have already done that and that's why we have some of these strange and virulent diseases. Perhaps we'll be seeing more of them from these kinds of scientists.
Regards,
Star Traveler
Have you noticed he has not started with himself?
What's really interesting about psychotics like Pianka is that they undoubtedly think of themselves as being among the lucky 10% who will survive.
Just quoting a small section of Carlin -- "Besides, there is nothing wrong with the planet. Nothing wrong with the planet. The planet is fine. The PEOPLE are f***ed."
Well..., in generaly, he's spouting off the same kind of stuff that this scientist is. So, what we see -- is in different areas of our society (from scientist to comedian and all in-between) -- we've got this same anti-God, anti-Biblical and anti-human philosophy being integrated into everything that we do. This is nothing but a Satanic deception on a very grand scale.
The Bible calls these people all fools.
From what God says in the Bible is that yes, people are the problem and that's why the whole "creation" was put into bondage and decay -- because of sin that is inherent in mankind (from the beginning -- in Genesis). And what the Bible gives is not a solution that we must kill off 90% of society to solve the problem -- No! The solution that God gives us -- is simply that we admit our sin and accept what God's Son, Jesus Christ has done in providing for our *invidual* salvation -- out of this terrible mess that we and the world is in (which involves all of "creation" too).
And, at the chosen time (according to God's plan) -- Jesus Christ will come back and set things straight. God says that mankind will not be the one to set things straight. However, the answer is not "kill mankind" (because God has acted in order to *save it*). The answer is simply -- Jesus Christ and following Him.
However, from Carlin to Pianka -- their answer is not Jesus Christ -- but the deception of Satan which is nothing more than *destruction* of humans. That's the goal of Satan -- destruction.
Regards,
Star Traveler
You said -- "What's really interesting about psychotics like Pianka is that they undoubtedly think of themselves as being among the lucky 10% who will survive."
Undoubtedly, he (or others like him) would like to work on perfecting that killing rate -- and then -- also develop a serum for protecting those who *deserve* to be the remaining ones.
So, he's probably thinking of protecting himself and others like him.
You said -- "At some point in time some of them are going to get together and try out their "ideas". "
I do believe this is what will happen. It will be the results of them (and others like them) believing in the anti-God and anti-Biblical ideas (like Evolution) -- which then means that we *really* have *no basis* to be any better than bacteria (like that scientist says). He's right -- if Evolution is true. There is no basis for our higher moral standing -- at all. (Of course, against that, I believe what God has said -- from Genesis to Revelation).
Now, in Revelation -- we see the *results* of what these guys are saying now. How come there are so many diseases and so many people being killed by famines and diseases (not to say anything about the wars indicated)?
Well, it very well can be (and probably will be) that these scientists are contributing to elminating the human race. As far as I know, they may have already engaged in it and we are seeing these results now.
What we see in the book of Revelation will be happening and these diseases which will be killing millions upon millions of people may very well be from some of these kinds of scientists.
Regards,
Star Traveler
Not at all. I take this guy very seriously.
While I agree with your larger point (that he has cast off conventional morality), I still say that he's "psychotic" in the dictionary sense of the term: "fundamental mental derangement (as schizophrenia) characterized by defective or lost contact with reality."
Psychotics can be very high-functioning, as this fellow obviously is, and they can also be very charismatic -- as this fellow obviously is. That's why they're so dangerous.
It's been a long time since Carlin grabbed my attention.
THis is right on, although I preferred the period when Carlin was the Hippy-Dippy Weatherman.
His heart attack changed his whole outlook on life and negatively affected his wonderful humor.
Shame.
You said -- "Certainly a death wish for 90% of the population qualifies as over-the-top big, as such things go.
Make sense now?"
Ahhh..., I see. Well, I guess my "Texas-size" comments were limited to "Jackalopes" or something like that. :-)
Regards,
Star Traveler
Here's a tip, if non-scientists haven't heard of him before, he's not a "top Scientist". He's one among many trying to make a name for himself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.