Jim to hear sinkspur talk, threatening to get people banned and always dropping your name one would think that you take work direction from him.
Both Dane and Sinkspur make one personal attack after another, they hi-jack threads and try to intimidate or provoke posters. This tactic often leads to a thread being pulled. We can't tell, because you will not show aliases, but it also appears they use more than one screen name.
Their obvious goal is to prevent meaningful results from being achieved.
They have been doing it since before Bush came into office. Even under Clinton they were pro government disruptor's.
When someone makes a personal attack or disrupts a thread, anyone should be able to hit the abuse button and bar them from that thread, if the moderator agrees it was a personal attack or a disruption..
Are their privileged characters or not?
THIS WEB SITE can and should be relevant. Currently less than 4500 people on this site indicated they will stick by the GOP if they don't act to control the border.
I predict. This site is in jeopardy of becoming irrelevant. Your answer will tell us which way it is going to go.
If you doubt this, you should run a poll on it.
Looking forward to using the system and getting some good work done.
:)Easy Does IT:)
LOL! look at the keywords and tell me who is doing the personal attacks.
And BTW, I only have one screen name and have since I logged on to FR.
It may become irrelevant to the Buchananites, Birchers, and other permanently disaffected types.
Are you suggesting that would be bad?
Some real debate would be nice...
they hi-jack threads and try to intimidate or provoke posters.
Good for you!
I had the misfortune of spending hours with a handful of them tonight