Skip to comments.Pelosi is in for a Surprise in November
Posted on 05/14/2006 2:49:05 AM PDT by MaineVoter2002
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the California Democrat and House Minority Leader who would likely replace Rep. Dennis Hastert in November if Democrats succeed in taking over the House of Representatives, made a snarky comment on...
(Excerpt) Read more at thiscantbehappening.net ...
They simply care more about their own power than the nation. That's a fact. They want us to lose in Iraq as we were forced to do by them and the media in Vietnam.
A humbled America is their path to power and more socialism.
You have to get out on the net more. There's thousands of lefty blogs spouting similar opinions.
"Opinions" is the wrong word actually -- it's more like ignorant , humorless goose-stepping to the tune of anger, hatred and mourning at the loss of what the Dem leadership proclaims was rightfully theirs -- starting with the 2000 election.
Facts and independent thought mean nothing in this bizarro world -- characteristics that are eerily akin to the failed, conspiracy-ridden societies of the Middle East. It's therefore not surprising they have so much empathy for terrorists.
It's a match made in hell.
I apologize for being so sarcastic in the post I just made. I realized that the moment I posted. Sorry.
Why, oh why do the demos and liberals get away with saying there were/are no WMDs in Iraq? Saddam used them on the Iranians and consequently on his own people. Satellite images in possession of the treacherous U.N. showed forty trucks leaving Iraq before the U.S. went in. Unless a person believes in the tooth fairy, it stands to reason that there are still WMDs in Iraq, a large country. In addition, there are now WMDs in, at least, Syria, and likely in many parts of the world now. Nations and traitors hesitated, giving the evil Saddam time to send WMDs God knows where. We may see the effects of them in time. How foolishly the world has dealt with danger and annihilation! If the world lasts long enough for history to be written about the Clintons, the Kennedys, Chavez, Castro, et.al., ad nauseum, it may go something like this: the world fiddled, while it burned.
Significantly Goebel, Lenin, and Stalin were all founding fathers of the 21st century Democrat Party.
The dem party right now is a criminal organization on a pure power trip; that's all there is, there's nothing more in the picture. We either need to outlaw and ban the party or we need to split the country up. One thing which might save the situation would be runoff elections, which might allow some third party to rise up and supplant the dems. Without runoff elections, nobody can vote for a third party candidate other than in the one or two oddball races where you can vote for a libertarian against John Warner because the dems don't run anybody against him.
Here is something for those who ae not satisfied that their pet project has been done. "750 "signing statements" even as he has signed that many acts of Congress into law." That is a LOT of activity.
These guys sure can't get over their rapist President being impeached, if that's what you want to call it.
I am really tired of their bs and that is what it is. It's like they have all been fed calf manna and anyone that has fed their livestock this product, although a very good product, knows the end result stinks to high heaven. I would say Nancy Pelosi probably ranks the highest on the stink meter. She must be overloading herself with the stuff.
Steny Hoyer (evil rat Dem Md.) is already planning a coup.Pelosi will never touch that gavel.
dims don't let facts get in the way of what they want.
President Bush should face impeachment if he lied about the reasons for going to war in Iraq (as he indeed did) or if he broke the law in ordering the National Security Agency to spy on Americans (which he admits he did).He did?
- Bush undoubtedly had more reasons for invading Iraq than he found it necessary to candidly reveal. But then, he gave more reasons at the time than this writer is willing to admit. It wasn't "all about WMD."
- Simple logic (slightly too simple). Bush does admit that
- the NSA is checking phone records to find out who is talking to al Qaeda suspects. And that
- NSA is listening in on conversations between al Qaeda suspects abroad and people in America without taking the time to get search warrants. And that
- there is a law which purports to forbid that.
QED. Except for one minor thing: that portion of the law has been held to be unconstitutional. It is exactly as if Bush's critics were claiming (not that they ever would) that notwithstanding Roe v. Wade, abortion is illegal in Alabama if the state law against abortion was never repealed by the Alabama Legislature.
A few from the moonbat fringe actually pointed out that Hitler never attacked us and Japan wouldn't had attacked us had we not provoked them with a trade embargo.
I am always amused by writers such as this guy, who KNOW the truth and yet just move it aside so they won't have to fit it into their thought process. But it's self-defeating, like writing about a criminal you want to go to the chair even though you have just heard he has been found not guilty.
WRONG! We are fighting for survival. It is those who don't have the guts to stand up for whats right who are NOT acting like you care about its survival.
Plenty right here on FR are acting like they are also too stupid
They are not acting.
The liberals are socialists this country has enough socialists in it now if they gain any offices than socialism will spread like wildfire.
Some are to blind to see the truth. So they attack those of us who clearly see what is happening the "holier than thou" bunch.