To: Jameison
...Would you rather follow President Bush's and the Rino's navigation of this country into being overrun with illegal aliens.."
As against a Ted "The Swimmer" and Nancy Pelosi controlled congress defending the country against illegal immigrants?
I haven't seen any difference in the Senate...the House yes the Senate no (Kennedy wrote the Marinez bill)...but then we are supposed to have the executivce branch, the President not them....doesn't look like it does it?
To: rolling_stone
Let me get this straight: I have to reward republicans that do not reflect how I feel on several major issues (immigration and spending for two) because if I don't I will get democrats that will seek to grant amnesty for illegals and spend money like drunks. Wow, what a choice. I will hold my nose and vote republican but in many cases will not be happy.
66 posted on
05/21/2006 7:10:24 AM PDT by
engrpat
To: rolling_stone
"I haven't seen any difference in the Senate"
Senate voted FOR a well in their new Bill..and The Swimmer and The Dick Durbin voted against that.
When you put The Swimmer in charge, there goes the wall.
"the House yes the Senate no"
The Imibots on this site have been calling for Republicans to stay home in November, House or Senate.
Plus when they have the conference between the House and the Senate to reconcile their bills, with the Republicans in the majority in both committees, there is a very good chance that
# 1, we'll have a wall that is closer to the House's version that the Senate's.
and # 2, the more obnoxious parts of the Senate's bill(like citizenship for i;legals) will not survive
"but then we are supposed to have the executivce branch, the President not them"
Ummm.....we have the executive branch, but laws are passed by the Congress.
67 posted on
05/21/2006 7:13:57 AM PDT by
Jameison
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson