Posted on 05/21/2006 2:13:49 PM PDT by Mia T
And Hillary has one other huge hurdle -and that is the fact that now- as a few years have gone by, a very large percent of American voters are fully aware of all of the following Chinese agents and cronies Hillary and Bill let into the White House ie.Chinagate- and all of our nuclear secrets - are GONE:
The infamous list/with two add-ons:
Ng Lap Seng, Yah Lin "Charlie" Trie; Manlin Foung, Wang Mei Trie, John Huang, Jane Huang, Johnny Chung, Col. Lui, Jing Wei Li, Irene Wu, Liu Tai-ying, Bin Liu, Irene Wu, Nora Lum, Shi JinYu, Shi-Zeng Chen, Xiao Yang, Liu Chao-Ying, Wang Jun, Wah Lim, General Ding Henggao, General Chi HaoTian, General Fu Quanyou, Chief of the General Staff of the PLA, Lt. Gen. Huai Guomo, General Kui Fulin, "Col. Xu", Gen. Liu Huaquing, William Peh, PRC Defense Minister Chi Haotian, China Resources chairman Shen Jueren, Lt. General Xiong Guangkai, Wang Liheng, vice-president of China Aerospace Corp, Gen. Ji Shengde, Bao Peide, 5th Vice Minister of the PRC, Zou Jia Hua, Vice Minister National Technology Planning, Lt. General Xu Qiliang, Chief of Staff of the PLA Air Force, Lt. General Wu Quanxu, Deputy Chief of the General Staff of the PLA, Zhu Roug-ji, Vice Premier of National Finance, Liu Ju-Yuan, Minister of China Aerospace Corporation (made both satellite orbiter version of Long March and the nuclear tippled missile version for the PLA), Keshi Zhan, Yue Chu, Xiping Wang, Nan Nan Xu, Chun-Fat Leung, Chang-Lin Tien, Liao Minglong, Tian Yi, Chen Qingchang, Pan Yongming, Shao Xingsheng, Jiangsu Yongli, Tongsun Park, David Chang and Sister Ping. Bernard Schwartz/Loral, Marvin Rosen, Keshi Zhan, Ken Hsui, Ms Melinda Yee, Hoyt Zia, Ira Sockowitz, Leon A. Panetta, Lanny Davis, Harold Ickes, William Meddoff, Alexis Herman, Jamie Gorelick, Hazel O'Leary, Mark Middleton, Nancy Hernreich, Craig Livingstone, Lynn Cutler, Neal Ainley, Maria Hsia, Robert Meyerhoff, Roger Tamraz, Joseph Landon, David Wang, Indonesian Arief Wiriadinata and his wife Soraya and convicted Miami drug trafficker Jose Cabrera; and also her ongoing association with China Poly Group Corporation / "Polytechnologies Incorporated," along with Hillary's ongoing ties with Ted Sioeng, Mochtar and James Riady and the Lippo Bank-Lippo Group & Lippo Pacific in Indonesia.
Also: Alamo-Girl.com
The title of this thread is misleading.
Scalpel!
Botox!
Acid peels!
Collagen!
Primer!
Spackle!
Epoxy resin!
Makeup!
Rustoleum!
Vaselined lens!
Dimmers!
More Spackle!
Digitally process!
Airbrush!
[Best viewed when drunk]
More Smirnoff!
Mia T. bump.
As I mentioned, social conservatives decided the last presidential election. I am amazed that so many people, conservatives among them, believe that only a pro-abortion, anti-gun, pro-gay-rights liberal Republican can beat a pro-abortion, anti-gun, pro-gay-rights liberal Democrat.--Tabi Katz I repeat: We must not focus on the non-dispositive issues. Giuliani is leading in the polls not because of his political positions per se but because of who he is. He is seen as someone of uncommon courage, leadership, eloquence, toughness, competence and achievement. In the same way, hillary clinton will lose (if we remain united) not because of her political positions but because of who she is. (Indeed, she may even lose the nomination because of who she is. Her inartful morphing and pandering, ironically, serve only to undescore just who she is. The Left, increasingly, does not trust 'that woman.') We must pick the best candidate. Period. He (and it must be a 'he'--see HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM above) will, in some important ways, be a non-Bush, IMO. Timing is everything. If you really want to win--and by that I mean if you want to achieve your agenda--you will pick your fights and timing wisely. If we lose the war, obviously nothing else will matter.
Lopez: Rudy? Does it have to be Rudy? Podhoretz: It doesn't have to be Rudy, but in my view he is the best candidate for the GOP. He remains wildly popular despite having made almost no public appearances in the past two years. His record as mayor of New York City—which one can plausibly argue is a job equal to being the governor of most states—remains the most extraordinary example of active conservative governance at the local level in the past 75 years. He is not a Washington candidate, which means he can separate himself from the congressional party's excesses and hijinks. Most important, he spent eight years as a liberal-slayer in New York, taking on every major institution, refusing to kowtow to the New York Times and the liberal media, and getting so much done that the city is still reveling in the revival for which he was almost solely responsible. Lopez: Why not John McCain? Why not an Allen or Romney? Podhoretz: John McCain has too complicated a history with the social conservatives and activist groups, and is such a gadfly that it seems inevitable he will act in ways to divide the GOP coalition. Unlike Rudy, he seems to prefer making friends with liberals and attacking conservatives, and that's not a good stance for a party leader. I guess George Allen is a plausible candidate, but why is he at three percent in polls of likely primary voters while McCain and Giuliani are nearly 30 points higher? As for Mitt Romney, I just don't think the nation is ready for a Mormon president (and by the way, I say that as an observant Jew who doesn't think the nation is ready for a Jewish president either). |
Bump!
Your usual good post of ugly people Phil!! LOL.
Calm yourself down, or put on your sunglasses!!
That said, if the GOP nominates John McCain or another RINO they can expect to lose.
bttt
thx :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.