Has anyone ever stopped even for a second to think rationally about this: of all the fetishes in the world, by what logic did liberals decide to pick this ONE fetish to call "free speech?"
What about a leather facemask and a whip? Necrophiliacs? Bestialists? Fecophiliacs? Should children be encouraged to "express" themselves like that? Of course not; that's just plain WEIRD!
But a guy wearing a dress; why not? After all, boys will be girls, right? What could possibly be more healthy and wholesome than that?
This is nothing but a wedge issue. Homosexual fetishists don't deserve any rights that any other fetishists don't have. But liberals wouldn't EXIST if they didn't have something disgusting to shove down society's throat.
Liberalism may have once been a political movement, but today it has become absolutely nothing but perversion solely for the sake of perversion.
The thing is, nobody is trying to go to the prom in anything other than a dress. I agree it is weird and the school can do whatever it wants, but to make a big deal out of it is silly, for the school and the ACLU