Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cannes sex films question role of porn, Internet
Reuters ^ | May 24, 2006 | Kerstin Gehmlich and Mike Collett-White

Posted on 05/25/2006 5:06:29 AM PDT by peyton randolph

Directors at the Cannes film festival this year say they are using radical images of sex to challenge mainstream pornography and its widespread availability on the Internet.

-snip-

He said that the United States had a puritanical view of sex which turned it into an issue in young people's minds. In one particularly provocative scene in his film, three gay men engage in a sex session while singing "The Star-Spangled Banner".

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at today.reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: cannes; hollyweird; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes; porn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
What next? Farm animals?
1 posted on 05/25/2006 5:06:31 AM PDT by peyton randolph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Why do they always have to have some pretentious "intellectual" statement about their stupid perversions?


2 posted on 05/25/2006 5:10:57 AM PDT by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squarebarb

Cause you ain't gonna get any respect hocking porn to the masses...


3 posted on 05/25/2006 5:14:38 AM PDT by ECM (Government is a make-work program for lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

These are the folks Hollywood pays attention to. Not the American public. The idiots in Hollywood think these people are intellectual superiors. Funny thing is that to Hollywood they probably are.


4 posted on 05/25/2006 5:15:37 AM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squarebarb
Why do they always have to have some pretentious "intellectual" statement about their stupid perversions?
My guess is that they're trying to win the favor of the French. Perversion + anti-U.S. = awards.
5 posted on 05/25/2006 5:15:42 AM PDT by peyton randolph (Time for an electoral revolution where the ballot box is the guillotine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
What next? Farm animals?

Yes. Farm animals are next.

It's what comes after farm animals that worries me. Perhaps the torture of children for purposes of sexual gratification will be seen as Art in few decades.

6 posted on 05/25/2006 5:30:10 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Never question Bruce Dickinson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
What next? Farm animals?

That is arguable a step above this.

7 posted on 05/25/2006 5:31:17 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
"In one particularly provocative scene in his film, three gay men engage in a sex session while singing "The Star-Spangled Banner". "

That’s actually pretty funny. On an intellecutal level, it even highlights the true motives of the gay movenment. I'd see that movie and recomend it to friends!

Wonder if they’d see the humor if they were wearing masks of Michel Moore, Jacques Chirac and Kofi Annan while doing that.

8 posted on 05/25/2006 5:34:09 AM PDT by elfman2 (An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
Anybody actually read the first paragraph in the article, let alone the rest of it?

Directors at the Cannes film festival this year say they are using radical images of sex to challenge mainstream pornography and its widespread availability on the Internet.

Which may be like fighing Socialism by being a Communist, but still....

9 posted on 05/25/2006 5:35:31 AM PDT by Celtjew Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

These folks are obviously way more enlightened than I am. /sarc


10 posted on 05/25/2006 5:48:49 AM PDT by Sender (“The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their right names.” – Old Chinese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

"These are the folks Hollywood pays attention to. Not the American public. The idiots in Hollywood think these people are intellectual superiors. Funny thing is that to Hollywood they probably are."

A mangy, three legged dog that keeps falling over when it tries to take a leak becasue it forgets it is missing a leg, is smarter than all of Hollywood!


11 posted on 05/25/2006 5:51:31 AM PDT by truemiester (If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: squarebarb
Why do they always have to have some pretentious "intellectual" statement about their stupid perversions?

It's their way of rationalizing their immorality. But I also think that, in their secular religion, offending religious people constitutes a form of martyrdom.

12 posted on 05/25/2006 5:59:01 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Wow! Time warp. I remember this stuff from the fifties.


13 posted on 05/25/2006 7:37:08 AM PDT by toomuchcoffee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtjew Libertarian

Anybody actually read the first paragraph in the article, let alone the rest of it?

Directors at the Cannes film festival this year say they are using radical images of sex to challenge mainstream pornography and its widespread availability on the Internet.

Which may be like fighing Socialism by being a Communist, but still....




I think few people here bothered to get the point of the article that these filmmakers are anti-porn and its pernicious effect on society and culture. Internet porn is about destructive hyperinstant gratification. The quotes from the article, were selected to elicit predictable knee-jerk reactions (a form of instant gratification at the supposed stupidity and the immorality preached the article).
As for fighting Socialism with Communism, one of the ways to
fight out of control fires is by strategically setting off controlled fires.


14 posted on 05/25/2006 8:34:51 AM PDT by l33t
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: l33t
As for fighting Socialism with Communism, one of the ways to fight out of control fires is by strategically setting off controlled fires.

Good point... Although that would be more akin to fighting Communism (the big fire) with socialism (a smaller controlled fire). That's nit-picking, though.

On the other other hand, I don't have a problem with Internet porn, so I think the film-makers are being silly, anyway.

It seems like every generation thinks they invented sex and every individual thinks that anyone who doesn't do it their way is a pervert, a puritan, or both.

15 posted on 05/25/2006 9:00:22 AM PDT by Celtjew Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: l33t

I don't think they care about its effect on culture so much as its effect on their bottom line. It's hard to make money charging R rated titilation in public when the comsumer can get X rated titlation free at home.


16 posted on 05/25/2006 9:04:00 AM PDT by discostu (get on your feet and do the funky Alphonzo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Your cynicism is well-warranted. However, most independent filmakers (including the ones mentioned in the article) operate on a shoe-string budget and they actually do care about much more then maximizing the bottom line, unless they get noticed and decide to sell out to Hollywood and sign up to produce mainstream trash.


17 posted on 05/25/2006 9:45:27 AM PDT by l33t
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
What next? Farm animals?

Why not - homosexual sex in cinema, crucifixes in piss, etc etc - all the left has to do is call their perversions 'art' and it is instantly untouchable.
18 posted on 05/25/2006 9:48:34 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Support American sovereignty - boycott employers of illegal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: l33t

Most independents are trying to make money, how much money they're trying to make is less, but in the end they generally want the venture to at least pay for itself and hopefully keep them in home and food long enough to finish the next project. It's not cynicism, it's reality, people have bills to pay, art for arts sake is fun to talk about and a nice ideal, but the minute said artist is hungry and there's no food in the fridge and no money in his wallet the reality of art as a job sets in.


19 posted on 05/25/2006 9:57:18 AM PDT by discostu (get on your feet and do the funky Alphonzo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Celtjew Libertarian
Although that would be more akin to fighting Communism (the big fire) with socialism (a smaller controlled fire). That's nit-picking, though.

Funny enough this has been done before. The New Deal ("social democractic model" or "socialism lite") was a political and economic strategy that was successful in staving off the threat of communism and fascism during the Great Depression.
20 posted on 05/25/2006 11:01:07 AM PDT by l33t
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson