Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh Transcript on Immigration (Today's show)
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_052606/content/america_s_anchorman.guest.html ^

Posted on 05/26/2006 6:59:19 PM PDT by Altair333

RUSH: Now, folks, as I say, I've got all this figured out, and when I told you this wasn't about immigration, I was right; and when I told you that what this is really all about is the Democrats wanting and needing some new victims, I was right; and when I said this was all about politicians, particularly Democrats wanting new voters, I was right. But I was not a hundred percent right. I was close. To sum this up -- very simply -- what this bill is, this is not an immigration bill. What is being done here is being done under the guise of immigration reform. What this is, is a huge attempt by certain politicians, mostly moderate and liberal Democrats and moderate Republicans, to expand the federal government, to increase the numbers of people in poverty in this country by importing them via this immigration bill, which will set up the need to expand the "social safety" net in this country, which will then empower those who believe in big government.

It is also designed to provide a free flow of cheap labor for businesses that want to access it, and with the few limits on legal immigration that this bill imposes, we're no longer talking just about Mexicans. We now can import workers from all over the world who want to come in for the purposes of achieving and accessing the American dream, and believe me, if certain American businesses want to get labor cheaper than what they have to pay Mexican immigrants, they want to get them from Ethiopia, they want to get them from Sudan, here's an opportunity to do it. It really is no more complicated than that. I mean, you cannot read this bill and conclude anything else. This bill is senseless.

(Excerpt) Read more at rushlimbaugh.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; biggovernment; borders; bushamnesty; democratvotes; fraud; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; immigrationfraud; immivasion; invasionusa; rush; senaterinos; shamnesty; talkradio; thieves; traitors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-203 next last
To: Altair333

Rush is right, it is all about expansion of the social welfare state. Things like borders get in the way. This is globalism, and it is about the NWO.


41 posted on 05/26/2006 7:52:57 PM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt
I love Charles Krauthammer too. I'm so glad he's there to refute Kristol and Barnes. Very interesting life story as well.
42 posted on 05/26/2006 7:53:13 PM PDT by SoCar (Get rid of Goober Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: LasVegasMac
And our "party" took direct action to get him reelected.

We see why Bush needed Specter and campaigned so hard for him.

43 posted on 05/26/2006 7:54:38 PM PDT by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

As is Fred Barnes and William Kristol... neocons all.


44 posted on 05/26/2006 7:54:38 PM PDT by streetpreacher (What if you're wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dittohead68

You are right...It also parrots exactly the policy position laid out by the Council on Foreign Relations, the Canadian Council on Chief Executives, and Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales report entitled "Building a North American Community" dated 2005. See it referenced with a link at http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=14965.

It details the plan to use several methods to create the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP).

I don't ever remember voting to get rid of my country's sovereignty, but it will be done through treaties all confirmed by the Senate, and the Supreme Court will never over turn a treaty because it infringes on my individual constitutional rights.

They have made treaties for manufcturing. Now theyy are working to "equalize" the labot markets with Mexico and Canada. It is all a policy established in the 2005 CFR report.


45 posted on 05/26/2006 7:56:03 PM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Altair333

I know, Rush has been pretty reticent to lay much of this on Bush, and I can empathize. I had to go through a few months of denial, having been a long-time supporter of GW, going back to his governorship. I kept thinking SURELY our President is just preoccupied with the WOT, and didn't REALLY mean that the MinuteMen were vigilantes. SURELY our President doesn't want such an amnesty travesty. SURELY he doesn't want to basically destroy the culture and composition of our country. Surely this, surely that. But, after a while, I just have to wake up.

It's been particularly hard on much of my family. Especially my sister. We made trips to Crawford, bought the oddball memorabilia; went to the Bush Library at College Station, etc. Nowadays, just the sight of GW on the television, and I see my relatives turn away their gaze, silently. It's really too upsetting for them to even air things out with talk.

Oh, well. Rush was terrific today, and I hope his support for our guys in the House helps strengthen their spines. The future of our country is in the balance.


46 posted on 05/26/2006 7:57:25 PM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
Fine sit back and do nothing and very soon your vote won't matter...they won't need your vote they will only need your tax money in order to vote buy via entitlements.

Soon the minority will be paying all the taxes (the top 50% pay 96% of all income taxes now) and the majority will be getting handouts. Entitlement spending 2006 is 60% of the US budget--there isn't a Congressperson who is going to touch it and as long as the dough keeps rolling in they will continue to vote buy with it.

Republics demand responsibility and morality not only from the elected officials, but from the People as well. Sadly, the more the government hands out 'entitlements' the more apathetic the people become and both fail to fulfill the responsibilities required of a Republic.

But why bother even trying since they already aren't listening, might as well give up...how do you like your socialism?
47 posted on 05/26/2006 7:57:50 PM PDT by socialismisinsidious ( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Altair333
"Yep- and he clearly knows it too. I noticed he was directly addressing House members on his show today. "

Rush is feeling a sense of urgency with this, as he should be. Those liberals in The Senate have likely done lasting damage to the Republican party and the President has turned his back on the conservative movement. Right now the conservative movement needs a leader, and Rush is about all we have right now. These are bad times in politics, but things can change. We just straight up need a new leader, one who will do the job that the president won't do.

48 posted on 05/26/2006 7:57:59 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: middie
Would you please elucidate as to what you mean by Rush's analysis being "not only unlikely, it's totally implausible"?
49 posted on 05/26/2006 7:58:12 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Altair333

Rush had an excellent show today. Thank GOD he is speaking out.


50 posted on 05/26/2006 8:00:16 PM PDT by Dustbunny (Amazing Grace how sweet the sound that saved a wretch like me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: middie

"He's correct in his ultimate opposition but his rationale' and what he offers as an analysis is not only unlikely, it's totally implausable. It's regretable that when Rush has a chance to lead by intelligent examination he chooses instead to postulate some bizarre conspiracy by hyperbole. He's actually more detached from rational thought and reality than I had thought. For the past several years I just disregarded him with a laugh and attributed his wild pronouncements to being part of his schtick as a pretend entertainer (the harmless fuzz ball routine). But now I realize he's really nuts."



Can you try that again in english?


51 posted on 05/26/2006 8:00:20 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher

It must be a sickness that has infected a lot of DC conservatives.
They don't know what its like out here in the real world.

Tonight I was behind two slowmoving trucks and at a stop sign the lead truck just sat there. The truck right behind blew his horn.
Well that brought out the finger from the first truck.
After the second truck turned off I was behind the first truck.
On the back of his tailgate was a giant decal which said MEXICO.
My head still hurts from the rage I felt!


52 posted on 05/26/2006 8:01:08 PM PDT by JRochelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Altair333

"The great mass of people will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one."

Adolf Hitler (1889-1945), German dictator. Mein Kampf, vol. 1, ch. 10 (1925)

===

The 'Immigration Bill' is the big lie The Senate and the White House are trying to sell us now.
53 posted on 05/26/2006 8:01:20 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim_Curtis
We see why Bush needed Specter and campaigned so hard for him.

I'm sorry, that is one dot I refuse to connect right now.

I think it was looked at more from the "we need every "R" we can get right now", and A$$hole was the incumbent.

Nothing more. Including taking a good look at how the A$$hole actually voted.

54 posted on 05/26/2006 8:01:41 PM PDT by LasVegasMac (Islam........not fit for human consumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
The 'Immigration Bill' is the big lie The Senate and the White House are trying to sell us now.

You're dead on the money. I'm calling it that from now on.

55 posted on 05/26/2006 8:02:41 PM PDT by truthkeeper (It's the borders, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: middie
middie, you don't like anyone, do you?
56 posted on 05/26/2006 8:03:24 PM PDT by used2BDem (Navy Vet (Navy Mom))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Dittohead68

Good points you bring up and something I forgot about. Years ago I saw three countries mapped out into ONE - USA/Canada/Mexico.


57 posted on 05/26/2006 8:04:07 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Altair333

Anyone who ever did think that this was actually about immigration is naive.


58 posted on 05/26/2006 8:04:39 PM PDT by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

Thank you!

OK, now this really just makes me sick (and a bit trigger itchy).

I had no idea that things had progressed to such a point as to have nations openly stating their intentions in that report - "Building a North American Community".

I have noticed things going on for a long time, and have connected the dots. Of course, I have been labled "paranoid", but I really don't think so - and the movement is out there to eventually merge into one socialist American union.

When that happens, our Bill of Rights will be gone (no 2nd Amemndment) - we will be subservient to the UN, WTO, and the IMF. And our wealth will be forcefully redistributed to the black holes of the 3rd world nation dictatorships.

Be very afraid - and do everything you have to to defeat this Amnesty bill in the Senate!


59 posted on 05/26/2006 8:07:14 PM PDT by Dittohead68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Dittohead68
I honestly believe that there is a force out there that is pushing for the dissolution of our borders (both north and south) in order to form an American Union (similar to EU). We have NAFTA & CAFTA already. The economy (business & manufacturing secotor) has withstood the first step of the dissolution. The next step is the labor. Following that is monetary (you notice how colorful our dollar bills are getting, lately?) unity. The final nail in the coffin will be some sort of new Constitution which is "current and updated" to fit the needs of our newly formed continental union. That way, the "American Union" can compete with the Eurpoean Union "equally", according to theories.

I agree with the above but as you said regarding Rush, I don't think you go far enough. This is not just about competition. The regional groupings are just the next, and most important step, to the coming world government. The CFR is actually calling for a global confederacy of 10 regional powers.

Rev 17:12-14

12 "The ten horns you saw are ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom, but who for one hour will receive authority as kings along with the beast. 13 They have one purpose and will give their power and authority to the beast. 14 They will make war against the Lamb, but the Lamb will overcome them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings-and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers."
(from New International Version)

60 posted on 05/26/2006 8:08:30 PM PDT by streetpreacher (What if you're wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-203 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson