Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals must come down off our high horses (from a liberal newspaper!)
The Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | June 1, 2006 | Chuck Williams

Posted on 06/01/2006 7:22:29 AM PDT by 2banana

Liberals must come down off our high horses By Chuck Williams

It took me nearly one-third of my life to come to a simple conclusion: Liberals are elitists.

Now, maybe that's not such a big deal to some, but to me it has become quite bothersome. It's pretty clear to me now that average hard-working Americans, be they red-staters or blue-staters, can smell the stench of elitist, intellectual posturing by so-called liberals and progressives.

One of the reasons why this bothers me is because I fear that it will cause us to continue to lose presidential elections.

The second thing that bothers me is that I may be one of those elitists. After all, I couldn't wait to tell the world that I had earned a Ph.D. I smile a bit on the inside every time my students and/or coworkers refer to me as "Dr. Williams."

I'm not so sure when it became important for people to know that I knew more than they did. What I do know is that it does not serve me well with average folk; this is at the core of the problem for liberals, and, given that we make up the base of the Democratic Party, it's also at the core of why we keep losing presidential elections.

To me, politics is about one thing: winning elections. Sure, policy and activism are wrapped up in there, too, but at the end of the day, you want to win - period!

My opinions about all this have been influenced by working for the Democratic National Committee, regionally, and volunteering for various local elections. What I've realized is that you have two camps within the Democratic Party.

You have folks who think too much, and folks who work very hard to ensure that our candidates are elected. Don't look now, but the nerds are attempting to take over the frat house. The problem with that is, they can't help us win elections. They simply stand around sipping green tea and talking about how great it would be if everyone read Armistead Maupin's Tales of the City. It's no wonder folks have begun to call us effete. We sit around, legs crossed, sporting Birkenstocks, and looking down on people who don't read as much as we do.

And, when you really get down to the nitty-gritty, you realize that somehow we feel that all that carrying on makes us better human beings than everyone else. That our values and morals are better than others. This is what really annoys folks about us.

What I've also realized is that this is a character flaw, and, that this does more to divide America than any of Patrick Buchanan's hate-filled rhetoric. Folks who don't read six national newspapers a day hold as much value and worth to our society as those who do. These folks raise families, work very hard for a living, and spend time thinking about ways to better their quality of life. They know what will serve their best interests, and they know what will not.

If the liberal elite would stop writing and chatting so much about how this country should be, they would learn more about how it is. We need to come out of the library from time to time and actually put our ears to the ground. We will find that the blue-staters are looking for leaders who will represent them, even if they don't have college degrees or sip imported beers.

At one point, that was the Democratic Party; today it is not. People were right to leave us. We gave them nothing to hold on to. We are no longer the party of inclusion; it only looks that way on billboards and campaign advertisements.

If we do not address this issue soon, we will need more than a Florida recount to make this party relevant again.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chuck Williams (drchuckwilliams@aim.com) lives in Philadelphia.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: arrogance; elite; elitists; liberalism; liberals; libs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: 2banana
I'm not so sure when it became important for people to know that I knew more than they did. What I do know is that it does not serve me well with average folk...

Of course not, son...you may have more education, but that doesn't mean you know more, are smarter, or wiser...in fact, the reverse seems to be true.

81 posted on 06/01/2006 9:43:51 AM PDT by gogeo (The /sarc tag is a form of training wheels for those unable to discern intellectual subtlety.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

My tagline says it all...


82 posted on 06/01/2006 9:49:31 AM PDT by bkwells (Liberals=Hypocrites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJemison; MNlurker
"what's worse, he believes everything he reads!"

No, i believe he is trying to find answers which newspapers are not going to give him. He is from the RELIGOUS left, it would be blasphemy for him to read something on FR for example.

83 posted on 06/01/2006 9:49:59 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* “I love you guys”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
"Folks who don't read six national newspapers a day hold as much value and worth to our society as those who do."

Correction:

They contribute much more value and worth to society in general. They actually DO SOMETHING. They work. They are contributing to the economic wellbeing of the society at large. They CREAT value through their work.

Kindly explain to me exactly what contribution to the economic wellbeing of our society your reading of 6 newspapers per day makes?
84 posted on 06/01/2006 9:51:45 AM PDT by roaddog727 (eludium PU36 explosive space modulator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War; oyez
The smartest woman on earth doesn't have a drivers license. She let her license expire about 20 years ago.

If she renewed it recently I am not aware of it.
85 posted on 06/01/2006 9:56:23 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* “I love you guys”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
This author may have taken the first steps toward understanding, but he has quite a long way to go. There are a few things that people like him need to understand:

The primary thing he needs to understand is that having a PhD these days is not an indicator of a high level of education. Left-wingers have so dumbed down the existing disciplines, and created so many bogus disciplines, such as gender studies, ethnic studies, etc., that a university degree may be more of an indicator of indoctrination than true education. Even the classic disciplines have been so polluted with ideology or dumbed down to avoid lawsuits or hurt feelings by failing students that they have taken on all the prestige of a grade school diploma. A perfect example of this phenomenon is the Liberal Arts degree: once it was a ticket to a good career; now it is a national joke and guarantees the owner will not be taken seriously.
86 posted on 06/01/2006 9:56:46 AM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
And, when you really get down to the nitty-gritty, you realize that somehow we feel that all that carrying on makes us better human beings than everyone else. That our values and morals are better than others. This is what really annoys folks about us.

Yes, it really is annoying, although it isn't just among liberals. It seems to be a disease of many elites of both parties. I think America would benefit from an administration totally fee of Crimsons and Yalies. No CFR influence, no secret handshakes, no RINO sellouts.

While he had his share of Ivys, ignoring them and standing by his beliefs is what endeared Reagan to America, even many Democrats. Call me "anti-intellectual", but I do think Main Street can run this country better than the Ivory Towers.

87 posted on 06/01/2006 10:07:50 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (I wish a political party would come along that thinks like I do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Great article, and yes, it's hard to believe a liberal would actually come out and say these things - in print, no less.


88 posted on 06/01/2006 10:12:32 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog

The president of Commodore International was a concentration camp survivor as a teen. He took a typewriter shop in Toronato to a $1.6 billion conporation in 15 years. This with virtually no formal education.

During an interview for a feature article in Barrons, the interviewer asked about his education. Jack replied "I have a PhD".

The somewhat nonplussed interviewer aske what the PhD was in.

Money!


89 posted on 06/01/2006 10:20:58 AM PDT by BillM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MNlurker

Reading MSM 6 newspapers a day is a good way to brainwash yourself into being... an elitist liberal.


90 posted on 06/01/2006 10:26:37 AM PDT by thoughtomator (A thread without a comment on immigration is not complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
totally fee

I meant "totally free".

For want of one little letter, the reader lacketh understanding.

91 posted on 06/01/2006 10:30:45 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (I wish a political party would come along that thinks like I do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
I'm not so sure when it became important for people to know that I knew more than they did.

Gag, chuckle, snicker.

92 posted on 06/01/2006 10:34:02 AM PDT by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn; Dont Mention the War
I also like to invite Hillery to drive from New York to Orlando going 55 MPH with three kids in the back seat. "Are we almost there yet? Stop touching me! There's a McDonald's, can we stop? She's looking at me. Stop!
93 posted on 06/01/2006 10:34:56 AM PDT by oyez (Appeasement is insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Reading MSM 6 newspapers a day would drive me to the psycho ward.
94 posted on 06/01/2006 10:36:46 AM PDT by oyez (Appeasement is insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
I'm not so sure when it became important for people to know that I knew more than they did.

And I am not so sure that you do know more than other people.
Not even those "average folk" you speak of so condescendingly.
WooHoo Look at me I just typed a big word, I must be a PhD
Even when looking at this guy's words in print, he sounds smarmy.
95 posted on 06/01/2006 11:10:13 AM PDT by D1X1E (*AMERICA* Love It Or Leave It (I volunteer to drive one of the buses))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Liberals should lay off the false whiney victimhood crap also.


96 posted on 06/01/2006 11:12:10 AM PDT by tkathy (The "can do" party can fix anything. The "do-nothing" party always makes things worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Smug Alert!


97 posted on 06/01/2006 11:21:44 AM PDT by LayoutGuru2 (Know the difference between honoring diversity and honoring perversity? No? You must be a liberal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Wrong Chuck. The reason you keep losing elections is that you and your ilk only THINK your smarter than everyone else. However, the facts don't support your arrogant rant. Statistics show that better educated people tend to vote Republican. In other words, among intellectuas, only the supercilious snobs vote Democratic.


98 posted on 06/01/2006 11:32:02 AM PDT by Attillathehon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Dr. Williams has yet to confront the biggest fear of "progressives" that they generally will flee as a vampire from garlic - the simple fact that there are conservatives who are as intelligent and (horrors!) occasionally more so than themselves. For some reason that is profoundly threatening to some sense of self that comes with assuming a progressive political identity. Someone earlier on the thread pointed this up as a basic insecurity - I would go further and suggest it's a suppressed anxiety that approaches neurosis. Then, of course, there are those who are simply too silly to appreciate that there can be such a thing as intellectual diversity, especially in politics; that there isn't left and right but merely smart and stupid respectively. These, I suspect, are too childish for serious discussion on the mattter ever.

If the author can break out of this mental lock himself and drag his audience with him he'll have made some progress. He hasn't yet.

99 posted on 06/01/2006 11:35:38 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

If you want to see why the Dims will lose again, you need only peruse the topics page of DU. They fight like a bunch of relatives trying to divide up grandma's estate. They're offensive to the mainstream of America.

In the end, the far left will once again control the Dim party, and will once again flood the races with women who wish they were men, and men who wish they were women.


100 posted on 06/01/2006 11:40:28 AM PDT by David Allen (the presumption of innocence - what a concept!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson