Skip to comments.
BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE
Ohio State University ^
| 01 June 2006
| Staff (press release)
Posted on 06/01/2006 2:26:58 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-256 next last
To: PatrickHenry
I was expecting another thread about Anna Nicole
21
posted on
06/01/2006 2:38:00 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: The_Victor
But God put some ice on it ...
22
posted on
06/01/2006 2:38:52 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: Altair333
I'm sure that Gore and RFKjr will explain to us how this was caused by those wascally wepublicans and will be again if they aren't voted out in 06
23
posted on
06/01/2006 2:39:27 PM PDT
by
KC Burke
(Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
To: PatrickHenry
Everybody be nice. First you people want everyone to bow at the feet of Darwin, now you want us to believe that Gaia evolves? Ha! [/creationoid mode]
24
posted on
06/01/2006 2:40:03 PM PDT
by
narby
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
why did the mass they found underneath stay with the surface rock?Global cooling??
Uhhhhhh.... global warming?
Dunno. I wuz joking.
25
posted on
06/01/2006 2:40:03 PM PDT
by
angkor
To: PatrickHenry
A 300-mile-wide crater?
:whistles:
Surfs up dudes!
26
posted on
06/01/2006 2:40:20 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Every lady in this land hath 20 nails on each hand five and twenty on hand and feet)
To: PatrickHenry
Yep!
It probably was brought about by all of the SUVs roaming around causing GLOBAL WARMING, eventually attracting the comet to that region......
28
posted on
06/01/2006 2:44:13 PM PDT
by
G Larry
(Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
To: DBrow
I don't think there is an irridium layer associated with it. Don't ask me why there wouldn't be an irridium layer, I don't have a clue
To: PatrickHenry
That's not a mascon, that's a Shoggoth.
30
posted on
06/01/2006 2:44:57 PM PDT
by
Ruddles
To: PatrickHenry
Since the cost of drilling through more than a mile of ice to reach these rocks directly is prohibitive...
um... they might want to try a few phosphorous grenades instead of drilling.
I must brag a little bit. If you Google for this story, you may find one hit. By tomorrow there will be dozens. As with several other significant science stories, you read it first on Free Republic.
32
posted on
06/01/2006 2:46:15 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
obviously when working with the fossil record in the p-t extinction area I assume there is so little to work with, and dating issues involved, that without a crater anything was speculation but I was always surprised at the number of scientists pretty much dismissing the impact theory for the P-T extinction, of all the extinctions to be doubtful of. 95% is a LOT.
Now that there may be a crater confirmed, how is anyone going to argue that such an impact wouldn't have exactly the P-T mass-extinction-type effect, given what the more accepted chicxulub impact did 65m years ago.
To: Diego1618
I have a feeling before it's all over we'll find all kinds of things buried under a mile of ice.....things that will answer a lot of questions.Jimmy Hoffa? 8^)
To: WoofDog123
Wonder what 250 million years of 5 mile deep ice moving around on top of the original sediments and gravel does to fossils in those rocks...
But actually, it'd probably be irrelevant: Inside the original crater, and around it, there are no fossils. Nothing but melted rock and shatter cones.
35
posted on
06/01/2006 2:50:01 PM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: bobdsmith
If the impactor was a comet head, there'd be mostly water, as opposed to a rocky-type asteroid. Just guessing.
36
posted on
06/01/2006 2:51:09 PM PDT
by
DBrow
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Put Macready on it. He'll get to the bottom of this crater.
To: PatrickHenry
a meteor impact much larger and earlier than the one that killed the dinosaursI've been saying this for years, but nobody ever listens to me.
38
posted on
06/01/2006 2:54:17 PM PDT
by
layman
(Card Carrying Infidel)
To: PatrickHenry
So Ohio State is using Wikipedia as its primary reference source? Remind me not to send my kids there.
39
posted on
06/01/2006 2:55:45 PM PDT
by
ZGuy
To: PatrickHenry
Does not compute in Young Earth Theory.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-256 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson