Everything in the story is waaaaayyyyy to conventient. Every possible scenerio from her being over 40 and on chloresterol drugs, so by no fault of her own she is high risk. To her momentary laspe from being normally responsible just happen to have occured on Thursday, so when her doctor said no on Friday the 72-hour window would be over before Monday. Every possible swipe including the snipe about 'security reasons' at the abortion clinic, aluding to those evil abortion protestors. This story is one more of the mounting numbers of examples of the new journalistic standard of 'False but accurate' made famous by Dan Rather.
I agree, the story is BS. Is there anything that can force the WP to admit that the story is fictional?