Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flag burning the next distraction
Atlanta Journal Constitution ^ | 6/13/06 | Jay Bookman

Posted on 06/13/2006 3:09:26 AM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom

Only 26 percent of Americans believe that their country is headed in the right direction, according to an Associated Press poll released last week. But surely brighter days are coming, thanks to the farsighted leadership of the U.S. Senate.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), one of the leading candidates for the GOP presidential nomination in 2008, apparently believes that what our country really needs at this moment in its history — the thing that's gonna pull us out of our national funk and set us straight again — is an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that bans flag burning.

So within two weeks, Frist will insist that the Senate set aside business he considers less important so it can turn its attention to the crucial question of flag burning.

There are two ways to interpret Frist's insistence on taking up yet another proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution, to join other critically important amendments such as those guaranteeing the freedoms of speech and religion.

One is that Frist sincerely believes that once it is against the law to burn flags in this country, the war in Iraq will begin to wind down, the price of gasoline will drop, health insurance will become available and affordable to all, scientists will discover that global warming isn't really a problem after all, our national debt will begin to shrink and illegal immigrants will stop flowing across our borders.

Or, Frist believes that pushing the amendment will somehow boost his political career and that of his fellow Republicans.

If so, he may be right. Despite all the problems we face and the growing realization among many Americans that it is time to get serious and start fixing what is wrong with our country — despite all that, maybe it is still possible to distract the American people with issues that are designed to anger and inflame us while not resolving a darn thing.

Maybe ... or maybe not.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; distraction; flagburning; oldglory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: TomGuy

"Hasn't a previous SC already implied that any such amendment would be a violation of free speech/expression? "



The Supreme Court does not have the right to declare a constitutional amendment unconstitutional. The only way to make a constitutional amendment unconstitutional is to repeal the former constitutional amendment.

Basically, the flag amendment repeals the "freedom of speech" part of the First Amendment. So according to these bureaucratic b*ttholes in Washington, freedom of speech is now unconstitutional.


61 posted on 06/14/2006 6:29:29 PM PDT by bigdcaldavis (Xandros : In a world without fences, who needs Gates?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Plus they would have legal precedent to declare burning the Mexican flag illegal (because this amendment basically codifies hate speech laws into federal law).


62 posted on 06/14/2006 6:31:08 PM PDT by bigdcaldavis (Xandros : In a world without fences, who needs Gates?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Caesar Soze

Yes, you demonstrated your stupidity quite well.


63 posted on 06/15/2006 2:57:49 AM PDT by libertylover (Democrats: Trying since 1968 to transform America into The Great Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RedBeaconNY

We're not talking about the process of disposing of a flag.


64 posted on 06/15/2006 2:58:59 AM PDT by libertylover (Democrats: Trying since 1968 to transform America into The Great Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

Excuse me for asking a knowledgeable source an honest question.


65 posted on 06/15/2006 3:35:30 AM PDT by RedBeaconNY (If you want to know what God thinks of money, look at the people He gave it to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson