Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HPV Vaccine—Another Deception of the Culture of Death
Human Life International ^ | 6/16/2006 | Fr. Thomas J. Euteneuer

Posted on 06/16/2006 9:13:55 AM PDT by Pyro7480

HPV Vaccine—Another Deception of the Culture of Death

The big news recently is that the FDA has just approved a new vaccine supposedly to inoculate women against cervical cancer. Predictably, the media and health professionals are touting this as the greatest thing since the Salk vaccine, but they are also engaging in a propaganda campaign aimed at distorting the public’s perception of it. I for one will stand against what I consider this newest marriage of the culture of death with junk science, and I believe we all should. In the next few weeks I intend to examine a number of aspects of this Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccine for the benefit of parents who may some day be coerced into getting their kids vaccinated with it.

Let me start by pointing out a few basic elements of this vaccine and its service as a tool of the culture of death. First of all, did you ever wonder why all of a sudden we need a vaccine for just one sexually transmitted disease? Just to give you a little perspective: in the nineteen sixties, before the advent of the birth control pill and other forms of abortion-causing drugs, there were only three sexually transmitted diseases which at that time were known as venereal diseases, a name derived from Venus, the pagan goddess of sexual promiscuity. Because of the exponential increase in illicit sexual activity in the past four decades, the number of distinct sexually transmitted diseases has risen to over thirty, not to mention the multiple strains of the distinct diseases. The Human Papilloma Virus, for example, is just one sexually transmitted disease, but it has over 100 different strains! Only a small number of these strains actually lead to cancer and most of its victims don’t know they have it and cure themselves over time.

Now, to put it into even clearer perspective: the much-touted HPV vaccine treats only two strains of HPV and two strains of genital warts. This is a tour-de-force against HPV isn’t it?

The most wretched hypocrisy of the promoters of this vaccine, however, is that, rather than calling it a vaccine against a couple strains of one of the dozens of sexually transmitted diseases, they are calling it a vaccine against cervical cancer. Well, it will certainly protect some women from cervical cancer in the future but that’s not the point. The point is that there are overwhelming numbers of diseases, strains and even cancers that this vaccine does not protect from, all of which are gotten by the very same sexual act. Thinking that this vaccine gives blanket protection against cervical cancer (which of course is how it’s perceived because that is how it’s being promoted) is like believing that thirty people jumping out of the same airplane will all be protected because one of them is wearing a parachute.

This HPV vaccine, my friends, is a classic case of the culture of death playing fast and loose with people’s lives. They use junk science to hook our terribly un-reflective culture on a promise that will benefit only a miniscule portion of the population, and then the false perception of security surrounding their newest ruse hooks everyone else into behaviors and lifestyles that perpetuate the damage and decay our decency.

Don’t fall for it because pretty soon they will be forcing you—and your kids—to drink their potions to the dregs.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ivfisablessing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 541-555 next last
To: Bigg Red

I guess you don't understand how vaccination works... It isn't 100% effective and if there are non-vaccinated children in the population, it increases the chances that even a vaccinated child that didn't get 100% immunization will get the illness...


241 posted on 06/16/2006 12:15:27 PM PDT by Alama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Alama

"They pulled off the vaccine because smallpox was eradicated. Thus the risks of catching the disease were smaller than the risks of the adverse reaction from the vaccine..."

You just make this stuff up as you go along, don't you?

The reason that only healthcare workers were being vaccinated a couple of years ago was because of the fear of a terrorist attack using smallpox, and since they are the first line of defense they got the vaccine. CDC was considering an extended program of re-vaccinating the whole country but they stopped the whole thing when there were a number of deaths and severe damage to otherwise healthy people.


242 posted on 06/16/2006 12:16:00 PM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

"Vaccines can CAUSE encephalitis."

Data, please.


243 posted on 06/16/2006 12:17:02 PM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

" The word vaccination didn't exist back then. Anyway the root word is the Latin vacca meaning "cow"."

Thanks for the history lesson.


244 posted on 06/16/2006 12:18:21 PM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: webstersII

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallpox

"After successful vaccination campaigns, the WHO in 1979[1] certified the eradication of smallpox, though cultures of the virus are kept by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States and at the Institute of Virus Preparations in Siberia, Russia. Smallpox vaccinations were discontinued in most countries in the 1970s as the morbidity and mortality of vaccination by then exceeded the risk of infection by a disease extinct in the wild..."


245 posted on 06/16/2006 12:18:27 PM PDT by Alama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber

Whoops you forgot to ping me on that.

Look at the end of the day - it's my right as a parent to decide what's right and healthy for my child. This is all information that can be gleaned from the cdc - I found it on 909shot.com (http://nvic.org/Diseases/mmr.htm)

I'm willing to take the chance on measles and any of the childhood diseases instead of taking the chance on the side effects of the vaccination - you do what is best for your family. But don't call people names because they disagree with you, it makes any point you might have made moot. When I was making this decision I talked to the pediatrician about it. The ONE that I was most concerned about was Polio. he said that's the least one to be concerned about - and teatnus was more concerning to him. Again, all polio now is related to the Oral Vaccination. Small pox isn't even vaccinated against anymore because it's been eradicated. There's no reason to give drugs/vaccines just because "we've always done it that way". It's certainly not the govenments job to force it - much less like this new cervical cancer vaccine that is dishonest at best - and a horrific experiment at worst.


246 posted on 06/16/2006 12:18:30 PM PDT by justche (Let me make something perfectly clear. I never explain myself - Mary Poppins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: webstersII

You seem to be oblivious of facts, history etc...

Try to educate yourself before posting!


247 posted on 06/16/2006 12:19:23 PM PDT by Alama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: justche

As I said, natural sewlection is still working...


248 posted on 06/16/2006 12:20:14 PM PDT by Alama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic

"There was a small drop coincident with the testing of the polio vaccine"

That's not what your data show -- at least not for polio. The "small drop" you claim was about 30%. That's more than could be caused by the testing phase.



249 posted on 06/16/2006 12:20:40 PM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: webstersII

http://nvic.org/Diseases/mmr.htm
CDC Website has it too.


250 posted on 06/16/2006 12:20:43 PM PDT by justche (Let me make something perfectly clear. I never explain myself - Mary Poppins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

FR is one of the few places where Biblical morality is considered. At least by some.


251 posted on 06/16/2006 12:22:36 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Alama

"You seem to be oblivious of facts, history etc...
Try to educate yourself before posting!"

I've never seen anyone so blindly and proudly ignorant as you. It took me all of 5 minutes to confirm what I said earlier.

From the HHS website, 2003:
"President's Plan

On December 13, 2002, President Bush announced a plan to better protect the American people against the threat of smallpox attacks by hostile groups or governments. This announcement is a vital step in ensuring that we are prepared to respond to a single reported case of smallpox. The President's decision will provide the public health and emergency response system with a cadre of vaccinated individuals who would respond in the event of outbreak of smallpox. The President's announcement identified the need for the public health system to provide smallpox vaccine to the following:

Smallpox Response Teams

HHS has been working with state and local governments to form volunteer state and local Smallpox Response Teams that can provide critical services to their fellow Americans in the event of a smallpox attack. To ensure that Smallpox Response Teams can mobilize immediately in an emergency, health care workers and other critical personnel are being asked to volunteer to receive the smallpox vaccine. Pre-attack vaccination of Smallpox Response Teams will allow them, in the event of a smallpox attack, to immediately administer the vaccine to others and care for victims. In the initial phase of vaccination, vaccine will be offered to core members of public health and health care response teams. Then vaccination will expand to include health care workers and others who may be first responders. "

And from 2005:
" Wednesday, Mar. 5, 2003


Contact: HHS Press Office
(202) 690-6343
HHS PROPOSES SMALLPOX VACCINATION COMPENSATION PLAN

HHS Secretary Tommy G. Thompson today proposed a plan to create a smallpox vaccination compensation program to provide benefits to public health and medical response team members who are injured as a result of receiving the smallpox vaccine. It is based on a similar compensation package that is currently available to police officers and firefighters. "

Virtually no one is getting the smallpox vaccine in the healthcare industry anymore because of injuries and deaths from it.


252 posted on 06/16/2006 12:27:08 PM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: webstersII; Alama
The reason that only healthcare workers were being vaccinated a couple of years ago was because of the fear of a terrorist attack using smallpox, and since they are the first line of defense they got the vaccine. CDC was considering an extended program of re-vaccinating the whole country but they stopped the whole thing when there were a number of deaths and severe damage to otherwise healthy people.

The Germans developed a much safer vaccine that can be used either against smallpox or as a prevaccination to give the immune system exposure to a greatly attenuated vaccine that is incapable of reproducing in human tissues before vaccinating with the traditional live vaccinia.

253 posted on 06/16/2006 12:27:33 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: justche

Thanks.


254 posted on 06/16/2006 12:27:35 PM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: justche

http://www.healthatoz.com/healthatoz/Atoz/ency/measles.jsp

"Many patients (about 5-15%) develop other complications. Bacterial infections, such as ear infections, sinus infections, and pneumonia are common, especially in children. Other viral infections may also strike the patient, including croup, bronchitis, laryngitis, or viral pneumonia. Inflammation of the liver, appendix, intestine, or lymph nodes within the abdomen may cause other complications. Rarely, inflammations of the heart or kidneys, a drop in platelet count (causing episodes of difficult-to-control bleeding), or reactivation of an old tuberculosis infection can occur.

An extremely serious complication of measles infection is swelling of the brain. Called encephalitis, this can occur up to several weeks after the basic measles symptoms have resolved. About one out of every thousand patients develops this complication, and about 10-15% of these patients die. Symptoms include fever, headache, sleepiness, seizures, and coma. Long-term problems following recovery from measles encephalitis may include seizures and mental retardation..."


255 posted on 06/16/2006 12:28:26 PM PDT by Alama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: justche

excellent post and points.

had the same conversations as well and within 30 seconds the conversation drifted from a discussion of benefits to simple outright scare tactics from the pediatrician up to and including, "well, we won't treat your children here otherwise" which was our last conversation.


256 posted on 06/16/2006 12:29:14 PM PDT by AlanSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: balch3

This isn't biblical morality... This is pure foolishness...


257 posted on 06/16/2006 12:30:07 PM PDT by Alama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

This HPV vaccine, my friends, is a classic case of the culture of death playing fast and loose with people’s lives. They use junk science to hook our terribly un-reflective culture on a promise that will benefit only a miniscule portion of the population, and then the false perception of security surrounding their newest ruse hooks everyone else into behaviors and lifestyles that perpetuate the damage and decay our decency




Bears repeating. This is all about the erosion of morals in our country.


258 posted on 06/16/2006 12:30:44 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

The primary problem is the misrepresentation in the way the press (and manufacturer) portrays this. The stuff is a somewhat-effective vaccine for HPV (which is good as far as it goes), not a universal vaccine for cervical cancer.

It'd be like creating an injection that helps you quit smoking, then calling it a 'vaccine for emphesema.' If such a thing were done, would people be calling for non-smokers to be given the drug, too?


259 posted on 06/16/2006 12:31:37 PM PDT by Sloth (We cannot defeat foreign enemies of the Constitution if we yield to the domestic ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Jr.
Besides lifelong sexual abstinence, how else can a person protect themselves?

Monogamy inside of marriage, abstinence outside. Is this a novel idea or what?
260 posted on 06/16/2006 12:31:48 PM PDT by Antoninus (I don't vote for liberals -- regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 541-555 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson