Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three US carrier strike groups steam in formation in Pacific Ocean (Awesome photo)
AP via Yahoo! ^ | 6/19/06

Posted on 06/19/2006 12:49:10 PM PDT by dead

The USS Abraham Lincoln, USS Kitty Hawk and USS Ronald Reagan carrier strike
groups steam in formation during a joint photo exercise (PHOTOEX) in preparation
for Valiant Shield 2006 on Sunday, June 18, 2006, in the Pacific Ocean. The
PHOTOEX featured 14 ships as well as 17 aircraft from Air Force, Navy, and
Marine Corp including a B2 bomber. The Kitty Hawk Carrier Strike Group is
currently participating in Valiant Shield 2006, the largest joint exercise in recent
history. Held in the Guam operating area beginning June 19-23, the exercise
involves 28 Naval vessels including three carrier strike groups, more than 300
aircraft and more than 20,000 service members from the Navy, Air Force, Marine
Corps, and Coast Guard. (AP Photo/U.S. Navy, Jarod Hodge) Email Photo Print Photo


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: guam; gwot; jointexercises; nationaldefense; northkorea; shipmovement; usaf; usn; ussabrahamlincoln; usskittyhawk; ussronaldreagan; valiantshield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-188 next last
To: JeffersonRepublic.com
The advantage of the carrier task force(s) is that they Can move from an aimpoint to a miss point very very quickly.

Assume a max speed of 40 knots - and they can go quicker in an emergency. It takes about a half hour for a missile from NK to land in the southern/mid pacific Pacific area, so you'd get a half-hour warning, 2 minute message and transmit time, and be (more than) 20 nautical miles from the (previously assumed) aiming point - which would be about 10 miles in front of the photo-op position anyway - since the KN's would have to aim for a moving target.

Biggest problem would be finding out that the damned KN fire control and missile flight ops and missile recovery and ballistic re-entry calculations stunk and they accidentally missed the real target and landed on you as you tried to evade the original intended target position!
61 posted on 06/19/2006 1:36:09 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
If you right click on the photo above and select 'set as background', it should appear as your desktop background. Did for me.

Yeah...but that fighter jet behind the B1s on the right side...the last (4th) one is not in formation....it spoils the symmetry. ;^)

62 posted on 06/19/2006 1:36:09 PM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gipper81

We did lose a bunch of MiG dogfights in both Korea and Vietnam before training (topgun and its brothers) started up.


63 posted on 06/19/2006 1:37:01 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: zarf

UNDER THE WATER WHERE THEY CAN'T BE SEEN.


64 posted on 06/19/2006 1:40:56 PM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dead
Yea, 4 15s, 4 F-16s, a B-2, and 8 F/A-18s, plus all the aircraft on the decks of the three carriers, not to mention all the tomahawks in the launch cells of the other ships, could ruin someones entire life.

Although that wouldn't be long most likely.

65 posted on 06/19/2006 1:41:40 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Was a sailor once back in the day. That photo brought back for me the indescribable beauty of the vastness of the ocean out at sea. Thanks for posting it.


66 posted on 06/19/2006 1:45:48 PM PDT by dagogo redux (I never met a Dem yet who didn't understand a slap in the face, or a slug from a 45)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
The unsinkable USS Andersen Field (Guam)

Yes, unsinkable, but very difficult to manuever if targeted.

67 posted on 06/19/2006 1:46:48 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

Nonsense! She'll go just where you put her!

68 posted on 06/19/2006 1:48:52 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: dead
Great photo. The flight decks are all configured the same with two ready alert Hornets ready to launch from each flight deck. A paired off squadron of F-15's, F-16's, Marine F/A-18 C/D's, Super Hornets, and a B-2. Looking for snorkels from the fast attack subs underneath. Lots of power in that huddle waiting for the play to be called in.........and North Korea has elected to receive!
69 posted on 06/19/2006 1:51:56 PM PDT by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf
I see what the tenacious pilots of Argentina were able to do to the Brits in the Falklands and it should make us think before oohing and ahhing.

From my amateur knowledge of that war:
Argentina ran out of Exocet missiles. Also the Exocet codes were acquired by the English from Mitterand and Exocets were thus sabotaged.

With enough effective Exocets the British would have lost

70 posted on 06/19/2006 2:03:53 PM PDT by dennisw (Fate of Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

The Argentines used Super Etendards to launch the Exocets.

If the Brits took out the planes, the Exocets would have been useless.


71 posted on 06/19/2006 2:08:46 PM PDT by Skooz (Chastity prays for me, piety sings...Modesty hides my thighs in her wings...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

More likely, the carriers are forming a screen to protect the true capital ships, the secretly re-activated Iowa Class Battleships.


72 posted on 06/19/2006 2:10:16 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dead

This part of RIMPAC?

http://www.c3f.navy.mil/RIMPAC_2006/about_rimpac.htm


73 posted on 06/19/2006 2:13:46 PM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Assume a max speed of 40 knots - and they can go quicker in an emergency.

More like 30.5 or 31 knots for the carriers.

74 posted on 06/19/2006 2:15:17 PM PDT by hc87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: dead

bttt


75 posted on 06/19/2006 2:17:04 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hc87

No comment.


76 posted on 06/19/2006 2:19:31 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Skooz; zarf

Good article on modern warship vulnerability to Exocet and other anti ship missiles

http://www.watermagazine.com/rocket.htm


77 posted on 06/19/2006 2:22:15 PM PDT by dennisw (Fate of Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: pfony1
Japan doesn’t like N Korea firing their missiles over Japan and hitting Alaska. That is what this is about.

N Korea's new missile can hit the west cost of the US.

78 posted on 06/19/2006 2:22:16 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* “I love you guys”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dagogo redux
Here's another view for your reminiscing.

Click photo to download larger version.

79 posted on 06/19/2006 2:23:50 PM PDT by AFreeBird (your mileage may vary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Pretty sobering stuff.

Technology is a wonderful thing, but against a capable enemy, it cuts both ways.

80 posted on 06/19/2006 2:28:02 PM PDT by zarf (John Edwards is a horses ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson