Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking? WMD report?

Posted on 06/21/2006 2:38:38 PM PDT by Scarchin

I just got a phonecall saying something big was about to break RE: WMD but I can't get to a TV. Anyone?


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: demnightmare; first; iraq; iraqiwmds; prewarintelligence; santorum; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 501 next last
To: Screamname

Ha! I was just going to post that I'll bet Clinton's first response will be "See! I told you so! It was my obsession..."


121 posted on 06/21/2006 2:59:28 PM PDT by Scarchin (www.classdismissedblog.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Is 500 shells a "stockpile"?



Depends on who you ask.

I'm reminded of an exchange from the movie "The Rock", where Ed Harris played a disgruntled military man seeking revenge on the government for the treatment of POW's. He sought millions of dollars in reparations for he and his men, or else he would release rockets filled with VX/Sarin gas into San Francisco, from "The Rock", Alcatraz.

Well, in the strategery meeting, which was attended by the late John Spencer (also in "The Negotiator", "The Left Wing"), the following exchange happened: (by the way, this movie was made during the Clintoon admin):

MAJ. KRAMER: "Wait a minute. What is the approximate casualty rate of a rocket armed with VX gas?"

COL PETERSEN: "...about 60 or 70."

COS HAYDEN SINCLAIR: "Well, that's not so bad."

COL. PETERSEN: "Thousand. SEVENTY THOUSAND, dead. One teaspoon of this stuff hits the ground, it's lethal only up to a couple of feet or so. One teaspoon of this sh*t in the atmosphere...will kill every living thing within a ten block radius. Get the picture?"

COS SINCLAIR: (resigned) "yeah."


122 posted on 06/21/2006 2:59:45 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (The Rat Party's goal is to END the conflict, not WIN the conflict...should be the other way around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin

Yet another liberal lie completely destroyed, though I thought the WMD issue was settled long ago.

Time for the traitorous Left to move the goalposts again.

Prediction: Guantanamo's sous chefs' improper adherence to the new food-group distribution recommendations of the USDA.


123 posted on 06/21/2006 2:59:54 PM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devolve

ping!


124 posted on 06/21/2006 3:00:01 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin

Looking for an article online. Anybody have a link?


125 posted on 06/21/2006 3:00:07 PM PDT by gophergas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

Oh yes!! I always thought they were in Syria somewhere. this is even better!!!


126 posted on 06/21/2006 3:00:07 PM PDT by jackv (just shakin' my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

Bookmarking


127 posted on 06/21/2006 3:00:08 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV

Check post 75.


128 posted on 06/21/2006 3:00:14 PM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Islamic Terrorists, the Mainstream Media and the Democrat Party Have the Same Goals in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle
I really hate to break this news, but this is not news. WE (the US) taught and trained them how to make and use chemical weapons back when they were at war with Iran. We knew they had these.

Interesting though that this particular find has what appears to be Russian markings.

I don't care if the markings were in Swahili or where they came from.

They ARE WMD's and Sadam "claimed" to have destroyed them.

Of course, "we" knew he had them and we found them.

I think you should aim your discerning thoughts as to WHY this information was not released and WHY US Senators had to FIGHT to get it release?

129 posted on 06/21/2006 3:00:19 PM PDT by seasoned traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa

Rope to hang themselves perhaps.

Also, these ARE from 1991. They can get trivialized by the MSM.


130 posted on 06/21/2006 3:00:24 PM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa

It is all one giant plan to win the midterm elections. Bush wanted to release the info in '03 but Cheney, Rove, and Haliburton urged him not to.


131 posted on 06/21/2006 3:00:24 PM PDT by LukeL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

>>They can't say "No WMDs" anymore!

Wanna bet? Just you watch!<<

Ya got that right!
The Dems best defense is to just ignore....


132 posted on 06/21/2006 3:00:38 PM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle

Yes...but wasn't the DEAL..that these were supposed to be destroyed???

IOW...even if they were from before, THEY HAD THEM, right?


133 posted on 06/21/2006 3:00:42 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin

Looks like Brit is going to cover it in a few.


134 posted on 06/21/2006 3:00:56 PM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: jackv

I'm pretty sure Syria is where the main stockpiles are...


135 posted on 06/21/2006 3:01:10 PM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Islamic Terrorists, the Mainstream Media and the Democrat Party Have the Same Goals in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: LukeL

A reason for not disclosing this is not making terrorists aware they exist (and possibly prevent them from even looking from) until they are all secured.


136 posted on 06/21/2006 3:01:37 PM PDT by ikez78 (www.markeichenlaub.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
"yeah, but it's ooooonnnnlllleeeeeeeeeee five hundred"

and your answer to them will be "it's mass destruction, not mass weapons".

137 posted on 06/21/2006 3:01:37 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (The Rat Party's goal is to END the conflict, not WIN the conflict...should be the other way around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin

Looks like the chain is running out on that anchor the Dems threw overboard...

LMAO


138 posted on 06/21/2006 3:01:53 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Democrats: Going under for the third time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: debg

The pictures of those intact planes being dug up is one of the things that has kept me totally convinced that the weapons have not been found yet...

They are either buried like the planes, in Iraq...or in Syria, IMHO>


139 posted on 06/21/2006 3:02:00 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

Can't wait to watch Colmes tonite on H&C!! hahaha!!


140 posted on 06/21/2006 3:02:18 PM PDT by jackv (just shakin' my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 501 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson