Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Duh! If the rich are paying more dollars, that means they are making more money.

Do you (liberals) want more dollars or a "more equitable" tax rate?

1 posted on 07/11/2006 4:59:43 PM PDT by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: Mr. Brightside
Do you (liberals) want more dollars or a "more equitable" tax rate?

The answer to that is an unequivocal "yes"!

2 posted on 07/11/2006 5:02:51 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside
Mark Belling covered this on Rush's show today.

The "Old Gray Wh*re" purposely skewed the numbers and included W[BJ]C's 2001 pit-of-recession and the post 9/11 hit to wildly knock down the performance numbers. Had they used the start date of the tax cuts & rebates, things look wildly better than any administration they can point to...

3 posted on 07/11/2006 5:05:35 PM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside

The New York Times will continue to lose credibility with reporting like this.


4 posted on 07/11/2006 5:06:53 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside
windfall revenue to enact policies and programs that tilt against growing inequality.

Let's see:

Buzzwords: check.
Sympathy generators: check.
Presumptive attitude: check.
Facts: none (check).

Clear to publish.

5 posted on 07/11/2006 5:06:57 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside
The revenue surge is neither a sign that the tax cuts are working nor of sustainable economic growth.

And the blue, cloudless sunny sky is not a sign that the weather's nice today.

6 posted on 07/11/2006 5:08:40 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside
As corporations and high- income Americans claim ever more of the economic pie, revenues rise, even if there’s no increase in overall economic growth....

So is he claiming that there isn't any overall economic growth? Note that he implies it without saying it.

The truth is that there has been tremendous economic growth. And this kind of a writer will report it as a negative if his income went up, but yours went up more.

9 posted on 07/11/2006 5:10:00 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside

Who wrote this article, Karl Marx? If George Bush solved the global warming problem, the NY Times would write that he made things too cold and thus caused global freezing!

But, what do you expect from the NY socialist libs who could care less about income inequities as they dine in the fancy NY restaurants and party in the hamptons with all their rich millionaire friends.


10 posted on 07/11/2006 5:10:28 PM PDT by MAD-AS-HELL (Put a mirror to the face of the republican party and all you'll see is a Donkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside
"As corporations and high- income Americans claim ever more of the economic pie..."

I didn't realize corporations were diners on the economic pie. I guess the New York Times' reporter must have had special economics lessons from Paul Krugman before he wrote this piece.
11 posted on 07/11/2006 5:13:32 PM PDT by Poodlebrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside
the result of growing income inequality ... a rapidly widening gap between the rich and everyone else.

Here we go again. Class warfare.

Is there an election coming up?

14 posted on 07/11/2006 5:18:11 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (LINCOLN: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside

From Nancy Pelosi's pen to the editorial pages of the NYT. Who knew?


15 posted on 07/11/2006 5:19:00 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside

If the poor make zero and everybody else's income goes up, the income gap widens. Duh. Since zero is zero, the only way to narrow the income gap is for everybody else to make less than before. And the Times thinks that would be a good thing?


16 posted on 07/11/2006 5:19:03 PM PDT by AConnecticutYankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside

bump


17 posted on 07/11/2006 5:20:13 PM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside
"Even with this year’s bigger haul, real revenue growth during the Bush years will be abysmal, averaging about 0.3 percent per capita, versus an average of nearly 10 percent in all previous post-World War II business cycles."

The NY Times is missing the whole point of tax cuts, which are not intended to raise government revenue but are intended to increase the disposal income of Americans. Big growth in government tax revenue is bad, not good, because it inevitably leads to big growth in government programs, government spending, and government control of our lives. The Times also appears to be factually incorrect in this statement because they appear to be assuming that the current business cycle and per capita government revenues have peaked. There's no economic evidence to support that assumption.

"Much of the increase in tax receipts is from corporate profits, high-income investors and super high-earning executives, sources that are just as unpredictable as the financial markets to which they’re inevitably linked."

False statement implied here: corporate profits are not generated by events in the financial markets. The reverse is true: the financial markets are driven by the growth rate of corporate profits. Much of the revenue increase is also from the increased income of small businessmen, which is not linked to the financial markets.

Does anyone at the NY Times know anything about economics, or did they all go to journalism school and just learn how to write?

19 posted on 07/11/2006 5:21:03 PM PDT by defenderSD (Just when you think it's never going to happen, that's when it happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside

Seems like the NYT has done the bovine equivalent of grazing on fresh alfalfa. This ranks up there with Gore touting global on the record cold winter day awhile back.


20 posted on 07/11/2006 5:22:40 PM PDT by IamConservative (Who does not trust a man of principle? A man who has none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside

First Teddy the Swimmer with an editorial about raising the minimum wage...

next.. the WAPO with a lame article about the wage gap between skilled and unskilled labor...

and now this from the NYT.

Subtle the left. Does hitting someone over the head with a cast iron frying pan equate to Dean's scream or the size of Teddy Kennedy's jockey shorts? (What's that? Size 60xxx?)

What next? Rubber chickens, vaudville acts, and Bible revivals preached by Jimmah Carter?

Lord have mercy. I can't imagine what type of diplomacy they would do. Oh, yes I can. Mad Maddie Albright and her lousy hat come to mind.





21 posted on 07/11/2006 5:22:57 PM PDT by OpusatFR ( ALEA IACTA EST. We have just crossed the Rubicon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside

Anyone catch Marvin Kalb's comments on BOR tonight? Apparently, he thinks we should all be bowing down and thanking our lucky stars for the NYT.


22 posted on 07/11/2006 5:24:47 PM PDT by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
"The revenue surge is neither a sign that the tax cuts are working nor of sustainable economic growth."

That's a lie. An outright lie.

25 posted on 07/11/2006 5:36:21 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside
You might think this statement is a non-sequitor,...

Paul Krugman, turn in your degrees. You are a dumba$$.

...but it isn't.

5.56mm

27 posted on 07/11/2006 5:40:24 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside

Wow! Who wrote this tripe? Does anyone at the NYT know something about anything?


38 posted on 07/11/2006 6:03:51 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (My head hurts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside

39 posted on 07/11/2006 6:24:03 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson