Posted on 07/14/2006 4:02:49 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
Target is putting plans to build three South Side stores "on hold" -- and making veiled threats to close existing Chicago stores -- if the City Council mandates wage and benefit standards for "big-box" retailers, African-American aldermen warned Thursday.
The saber-rattling is intensifying as the clock winds down toward a July 26 showdown vote on plans to make Chicago the nation's first major city to establish a "living wage" for stores with at least 90,000 square feet of space operated by retailers with $1 billion in sales.
Minneapolis-based Target becomes the second retailing giant to threaten to pull out of the lucrative Chicago market in a last-ditch effort to stop an ordinance championed by organized labor that breezed through the City Council's Finance Committee 15-6 and has attracted support from 33 aldermen.
WAGE WAR
The current federal minimum wage is $5.15 an hour. Illinois' minimum wage is $6.50
Most Chicago area Wal-Mart employees average $10.99 an hour, with just a few making the starting wage of $7.25 an hour, Wal-Mart spokesman John Bisio recently said.
As of 2004, Target in many cities had a starting salary of about $7 an hour, published reports said. A few Target workers outside Illinois said they recently started with salaries as low as $6.25 an hour, according to postings on the Target Union! (www.targetunion.org) Web site for store employees.
Wal-Mart has threatened to cancel plans to build as many as 20 Chicago stores over the next five years if retailers are required to pay employees at least $10 an hour and $3 in benefits by July 1, 2010.
'It would be devastation for us'
Mayor Daley is taking the threat seriously. He has challenged aldermen who oppose Wal-Mart's 20-store expansion to describe how they would replace the 8,000 lost jobs.
Target failed to return calls on the admonition communicated to aldermen of the 5th, 9th and 34th wards in recent days. Target real estate executive Chris Case was scheduled to meet with African-American aldermen Thursday, but the meeting was canceled because of scheduling conflicts.
Ald. Carrie Austin (34th) said a Target pullout would be devastating to the 32-acre shopping mall at 119th and Marshfield that developers had hoped to build, with help from a $23 million city subsidy. Home Depot would likely follow Target out the door. As many as 1,000 jobs would be lost, Austin said.
"It would be devastation for us. Our largest employer in the 34th Ward is the Police Department. The second-largest for us would be Jewel. We have no other resources," Austin said.
Referring to the anti-Wal-Mart movement that gave birth to the big-box ordinance, Austin said, "If you want to bully up on Wal-Mart, you've got to bring in the other ones, and damned if you do on them. If they suffer from it, too bad. If you want to control Wal-Mart, you should go about that a different way."
Accused of 'bullying tactics'
Ald. Leslie Hairston (5th) said she has a letter of intent from Target to build a new store at Marquette and Stony Island in her ward. But the developer has told her the store is "on hold" and that Target may close existing Chicago stores if the big-box ordinance goes through.
Hairston called it little more than a scare tactic. And even if the threat turns out to be real, she's standing firm in support of organized labor.
"Wal-Mart and Target could pay their people a living wage. Then we wouldn't have this problem, and people could actually live on the money they made," Hairston said.
Ald. Joe Moore (49th), chief sponsor of the big-box ordinance, accused Target and Wal-Mart of using "bullying tactics" to stop a train that has already left the station.
"It's an idle threat. ... They're clearly trying to ... intimidate members of the City Council. I am very hopeful that members will hold firm. ... The votes are still there," Moore said. He predicted 33 votes for the ordinance, "maybe more," even though Daley has been buttonholing aldermen to try to stop it.
Ald. Howard Brookins (21st) is still searching for a big-box retailer to replace the Wal-Mart his colleagues nixed at 83rd and Stewart.
Brookins said Wal-Mart executives have told him they may take the lead of the riverboat casinos that ring Chicago and run free shuttle buses to their suburban stores if the big-box ordinance passes.
"I don't know if it was in jest, but they did say it. ... That is an option that they could employ. They could set up locations to have pickup and dropoff. I don't think that is that farfetched," Brookins said.
fspielman@suntimes.com
I have run into my family doc (retired) several times at Menards and Wal-Mart, professionals want the same best prices they can get just like everyone else.
He even asked my advice about rewiring his house, I gave him my best advice and told him that there were a lot of dead amateur electricians.
The thug unions control Chicago. Their existing contract escalators are tied to the mandated minimum wage.
A raise in the minimum raise increases the entire union scale.
ZOT........
(sorry couldn't resist)
".........increasing the minimun wage is not as significant..."
So you say! Calculate all of the contract wages that are tied to the minimum wage. They all go up. Calculate all of the additional revenue govt will rake in. Why do you think unions and government are in bed on this issue?
Heck, pretty soon all we'll have is PT jobs with no benes and be forced to accept Social Healthcare.
But as long as the Politicians, Lawyers and Corporate Execs are happy all is well!
If you don't have any skills, any education or any ambition to improve yourself, you are probably right.
And which union do you belong to?
Sounds like a good place to open a donut shop.
Hah! I never thought of that.
But like I said as long as the Politicians, Lawyers and Corporate Execs are happy all is well.
Which group do the two of you come from?
Typical union crap. I'm so happy I live in a "right to work" state.
Not sure how Target does business but Wal-Mmart buys their properties, so they have no leases to break.
You are wrong about W-M, I don't know about Target.
They aren't able to. If you continue to wish for the impossible, your life will be one filled with disappointment.
These are not "living wage" jobs. These are not "living wage" jobs. These are not "living wage" jobs. These are not "living wage" jobs. These are not "living wage" jobs. These are not "living wage" jobs.
These jobs will not enable you to:
---Raise a family
---Buy a home
---retire at age 55
---buy a boat and RV
I hope I was able to help.
If they aren't employed, what will you be paying for?
I'll never go back.
From snopes.com: The Target Corporation is a publicly held, U.S.-based firm which has been headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, since it began as the Dayton Dry Goods Company in 1902. Target is not now, nor has it ever been, foreign-owned. (A French-based financial institution, AXA, holds about 42 million shares of Target stock, but that holding constitutes less than 5% of Target Corporation's outstanding shares.)
D@mn straight...these b@stards want to buy people off pretty cheap, don't they? That shows no respect.
Used to have to deal with them in the trucking industry. Talk about thugs!
They had a couple of those stores in New Orleans.
They used to...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.