Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pull Plug On High Gas Prices
cbs ^ | 7/18/06

Posted on 07/18/2006 12:05:31 PM PDT by LouAvul

If you're fed up with paying high gas prices, Hybrid Technologies says it has a solution for you.

The company is out with an "electric smart car" that runs on a lithium battery.

The company's co-founder, Richard Griffiths, pointed out to The Early Show co-anchor Rene Syler Tuesday that that's the same type of battery you'll find in cell phones, PDAs, computers, "pretty much anything we use now that's a portable electronic device."

Griffiths showed Syler how you simply plug the car in, literally, to a conventional 110 volt outlet.

"If you completely drain the battery," Griffiths said to Syler, "it's like your cell phone, if you drain the battery, a full charge is five to six hours. Normally, people won't drain the entire battery, so maybe one to two hours at night. Basically, it's like, 'Honey, did you take out the garbage and plug in the car?' It's kind of a new way of thinking. It's a plug-in hybrid. It uses absolutely no gas.

"On a single charge, you can go up to 120 miles and, depending how you drive, 150 miles."

"It's very, very small, though," Syler observed. "I am thinking safety. How does it crash test?"

"It has a three-star crash test rating," Griffiths responded, "and it has air bag systems, five air bags, three in the front. It's like a walnut. It's actually a very safe car. This is a city commuter car, so it's not a car that you'll necessarily be driving on the highway every day. So we're not looking at high speeds, necessarily."

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: energy; gasoline; gasprices; hybridtechnologies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-240 next last
To: Myrddin

At my age,if I drive 300 miles from home, then stopping for a few hours rest wouldn't be so bad!

:)

But I understand what you mean.


121 posted on 07/18/2006 12:57:02 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan; Bikers4Bush

O.k. That's a different story and I agree that is becoming common where you have a source of water and a nearby hill or cliff (or a mine shaft) where you can do this to produce peaking power. But the energy to pump it back up to the top does not come from the energy produced by its descent, but from another source.


122 posted on 07/18/2006 1:01:43 PM PDT by CedarDave (When a soldier dies, a family cries, a protester gloats, an Iraqi votes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1
Biker is right. It's not perpetual motion

That's right - he's not claiming perpetual motion. Perpetual motion is child's play compared to what he is claiming.

Here is the problem in basic physics. Held up at an altitude of 100 meters, 1 kg of water has 981 Joules of potential energy. When that water falls, you can only capture a max of 981 Joules unless you convert mass to energy. Let's say your turbine is 90% efficient. So you only capture 883 Joules.

Now lets pump the water back uphill. To do so, you need to use 981 Joules (laws of physics), and that is assuming your pump is 100% efficient. Say you've got a spectacular pump that is 90% efficient. Then you need to put in 1090 Joules of energy into the pump to get it to do 981 Joules of work.

So all in all, you've put in 1090 Joules and got out 883 Joules. You're down 207 Joules. In other words, it has taken more energy to run the system than you get out. Perpetual motion would require 0 input. Biker is saying there is a net output, which would require efficiencies better than 100%, which is absolutely impossible.

The ONLY way to get energy out is to have the discharge of the system at a lower altitude than the intake. That is how dams work.
123 posted on 07/18/2006 1:02:22 PM PDT by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
"Normally, people won't drain the entire battery, so maybe one to two hours at night."

One hour's charge in a 110 v. outlet even at the full 15 Amp capability of most outlets, stores about 3% of the energy in one gallon of gasoline (assuming a very high efficiency in the charging operation). Either the reporter or the car company is smoking something strong. The car will likely go further on whatever they are smoking than it will on the electric charge.

124 posted on 07/18/2006 1:03:17 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm

No, really, it works. ;^)

I apply the same principle when I bench press. As I lower the bar I store that energy in my muscles and I then I use part of that energy to raise the bar again. By the time I'm done lifting I'm so refreshed and full of energy I usually run a marathon.

Don't worry, you'll never explain the fundamental limits of physics to someone who knows better. :)


125 posted on 07/18/2006 1:04:01 PM PDT by Some hope remaining.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
See a couple of the previous posts....

You're right...they're missing a step. Roughly, the plant generates power during peak (read: expensive) periods and pumps the water back during off-peak (read: cheap) periods. Energy is *not* conserved, just money. :-)

Hydro plants do this all the time - generate during the day and pump at night.

126 posted on 07/18/2006 1:04:11 PM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush

"It doesn't take as much energy to pump the water back up as it generates going down because instead of passing just one turbine the same water passes hundreds of them generating enough to pump the water back up and they sell off the rest."


C'mon, now, think about what you're saying. In falling over a given distance, there is only so much potential energy in the water. In falling that potential energy is converted to kinetic energy (ie velocity), which is then converted into electricity by a turbine. One turbine or a hundred on the way down, there is only a fixed total amount of energy that can be extracted in the form of mechanical motion (with losses) and then into electricity (with more losses). The total amount of electricity generated will ALWAYS be less than the original potential energy of the water, and that original potential energy is the minimum (assuming no losses, which is impossible) that would be necessary to restore that water to the top of the shaft.

The laws of thermodynamics are immutable and no clever device or system can get around that. You've either misunderstood what they're doing down there, or they're selling snake oil.


127 posted on 07/18/2006 1:04:17 PM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

You're a braver person than I.

I've seen too many accidents on the highway on my morning commute. Too many people just aren't paying attention in the morning - for some reason, the accidents are far less common during the evening commute.


128 posted on 07/18/2006 1:04:43 PM PDT by CertainInalienableRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
The real problem for these is that the electricity is not free. If they had plug-in's at work, I'd seriously consider it.

That could be accomodated. Plug the car in, swipe your employee ID card and the power comes on....metered. The kilowatt-hr charge appears as a deduction on your paycheck.

129 posted on 07/18/2006 1:04:47 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

"But the energy to pump it back up to the top does not come from the energy produced by its descent, but from another source.
"

Right. That's the only way such a thing would work, obviously. There's no free energy in a closed system, I'm afraid.

I love hydroelectric power. If I were in charge, we'd be generating from every river and stream of adequate size. Back in my Mother Earth News days, I even had a small turbine working in a stream so small you couldn't really call it a stream. It powered an automobile alternator, then charged 12 v. batteries to run lights in the chicken house.

But that was long ago and far away. It's amazing what a small stream can do.


130 posted on 07/18/2006 1:06:07 PM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
There are already three of them.

I didn't see them until after I posted. TANSTAAFL!

131 posted on 07/18/2006 1:06:25 PM PDT by 6ppc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: wbill
Now it makes sense. I knew there had to be a major step missing.

They use the pool at the top almost like a giant storage battery for potential energy and then use it during peak loads.

132 posted on 07/18/2006 1:07:16 PM PDT by capt. norm (W.C. Fields: "The time has come to take the bull by the tail and face the situation".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
"They line the shafts with smaller turbines and then run water down the sides generating power from top to bottom using gravity. They then use some of the electricity they create to pump the water back up continuing the process."

This is a perpetual motion machine description. I assumed you first description was that of a peak shaving plant that evens out the load during morning and evening hours.
133 posted on 07/18/2006 1:07:58 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush

"Would you consider a large dam to be perpetual motion?"

Normal hydroelectric plants don't involve pumping water back up into the resevoir (although this can be done as a means of storing excess electrical power from other sources for a later time). The water does make its way back up into the resevoir eventually, thanks to the input of solar energy that drives the precipitation cycle (you know, solar heat causes evaporation which turns into rain in the mountains that ends up in the resevoir again). Technically I guess you could call hydroelectric solar power, but then almost every form of energy on earth does originally derive from solar energy, if the "fossil" fuel model is correct. Nuclear and geothermal energy are exceptions.


134 posted on 07/18/2006 1:08:38 PM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush

It's not about what I believe, its about physics.

Water at a higher elevation has POTENTIAL energy.. when it falls it releases that energy as KENETIC energy... When it reaches the bottom of the hill.. it takes as much energy to put that water to the top of the hill as it gave up falling down the hill.. its called the law of conservation of energy.

So, to do what you claim, every bit of energy of that water falling would need to be captured, and then used to put that water back to the top of the hill... which would not throw of any extra energy at all for any other use... not to mention the loss of energy through friction and basic inefficiencies of mechanical devices.

What you are suggesting is going on is impossible, not because I believe it to be, but because it defies the fundamental laws of physics. Trust me, if someone has built a system as you describe they would be receiving the nobel price for science and it would be headlines around the world. Our fundamental understanding of physics would be shattered.


135 posted on 07/18/2006 1:08:47 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

If it was cheap enough, people would buy it.


136 posted on 07/18/2006 1:08:49 PM PDT by Protagoras ("Minimum-wage laws are one of the most powerful tools in the arsenal of racists." - Walter Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1
Many modern trolley systems use the reverse EMF from braking to charge a battery. It conserves kinetic energy as electrical potential in the battery. It is efficient enough to be worthy of including in the system design. Others covert the kinetic linear motion into rotational momentun in a flywheel that can be tapped to provide the energy to break from from a dead stop. Again, it makes enough sense to include if you can afford to do so.
137 posted on 07/18/2006 1:09:00 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
Bingo. A Battery is a Good Analogy.

One of the local lakes rises and falls a foot or more due to this process, depending on time of day. I took the time to figure out how many gallons it look to change the water level by an inch.....this was back in my college days.

If I was smart, I'd have spent the time figuring how much energy pumping all the water back in would've consumed.

138 posted on 07/18/2006 1:10:42 PM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: RonF

"Now, how much will it cost me to recharge it?"

I'm recalling around $1.00 per night, so roughly $30.00 a month, for a Prius converted to plug-in hybrid. Even though the guy refers to his as a hybrid as well, it's a pure electric, so expect something higher, but certainly not double; fifteen dollars a week on your electric bill is way cheaper than a tank of gas a week. Battery replacement is costly, and would have to figure in somewhere, in order to get a good grasp of the comparison, though.


139 posted on 07/18/2006 1:10:42 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TChris
Electricity comes from magic!

ROTFL.

Enviromentalists think so, especially when its compared to gas powered autos. Not much thought goes into how electricity is actually made.
140 posted on 07/18/2006 1:10:56 PM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Man was made in the image of God, not pond scum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-240 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson