Skip to comments.
Paul Sheehan asks why Western feminists are mute on the plight of their Islamic sisters.
Sydney Morning Herald ^
| 24 July 2006
| Paul Sheehan
Posted on 07/23/2006 5:14:05 PM PDT by Fair Go
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
More exposure of left-wing hypocrisy and PC!
1
posted on
07/23/2006 5:14:09 PM PDT
by
Fair Go
To: Fair Go
Just as when they enabled the soiled bedsheet known as Bill Clinton, mainstream feminists are exposed as the agenda driven leftist wackos that they are.
To: Fair Go
They won't change their tune until a RAT is in the Oval Office. Look, the feminists gave the last RAT a pass and he was a suspected rapist, a groper par-excellance, and a diddler with the hired help with nary a word from the Ellie the shamiel Smeal types. As long as the RATs throw em a few bones in the form of more daycare centers and unrestrained, unrestricted abortion on demand, they (the RATs) will get a pass from the feminists.
3
posted on
07/23/2006 5:23:24 PM PDT
by
AdvisorB
(For a terrorist bodycount in hamistan, let the smoke clear then count the ears and divide by 2.)
To: Victoria Delsoul
4
posted on
07/23/2006 5:26:14 PM PDT
by
HitmanLV
("5 Minute Penalty for #40, Ann Theresa Calvello!" - RIP 1929-2006)
To: Fair Go
The only explanation is a sociopathic hunger for power and the right to abortion. They will use whatever means necessary to keep that "freedom", to avoid any consequences to their behavior, regardless of the impact on the rest of mankind.
5
posted on
07/23/2006 5:35:36 PM PDT
by
ODC-GIRL
(Proudly serving our Nation's Homeland Defense)
To: Fair Go
6
posted on
07/23/2006 5:37:17 PM PDT
by
Dubya-M-Dees
(Mary Mapes was the first in the MSM that had to participate in an election by the people... she lost)
To: somemoreequalthanothers
Not only did feminists not balk at the actions of the former salamandor-in-cheif they actually participated in Carville's "nuts and sluts" defense.
7
posted on
07/23/2006 5:48:21 PM PDT
by
Gumption
("Durka Durka Mohammed Jihad", "Sherpa, Sherpa, Bakala")
To: Fair Go
The silence of the feminists on this subject is criminal.
8
posted on
07/23/2006 5:48:26 PM PDT
by
samtheman
To: samtheman
The silence of the feminists on this subject is criminal.They're not feminists. No true feminist could make common cause with the islamo-nazis or remain silent in the face of their fanatic misogyny.
To: Mordacious
"They're not feminists. No true feminist could make common cause with the islamo-nazis or remain silent in the face of their fanatic misogyny."
Indeed. They are Leftists. Leftists who see a common cause against the West with Islam. Of course, we know that if Islam wins, liberals would be the first to be buried by a stone wall (homosexuals) or stoned (women), whipped, or beheaded (everyone else), but let no one ever accuse the Left of being smart. Which makes it depressing that they seem to get heard and get their way more than we do. We've even allowed them to define the language!
10
posted on
07/23/2006 6:19:29 PM PDT
by
Peisistratus
(O xein angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti tede...)
To: Peisistratus
It is possible that the confrontation with Islamofascism will have the salutary effect of finally unmasking both the "feminists" (anti-American female leftists) and the political left (anti-civilization, America-hating sociopaths). They got away with supporting communism and other dictatorships, and even made common cause with the genocidal Kymer Rouge in Cambodia...but it's difficult to see how they will be able to maintain any kind of legitimacy as they march shoulder-to-shoulder with the barbaric, misogynistic, primitive, bloodthirsty, vicious adherents of radical Islam.
11
posted on
07/23/2006 7:08:07 PM PDT
by
ct235
To: ODC-GIRL
re: The only explanation is a sociopathic hunger for power and the right to abortion.)))
I think the real explanation is cowardice. Insult a Christian, and he'll complain and criticize. Feminists don't worry about insulting Christianity, although they style themselves are heroines for doing so. Insult Islam, and a Muslim might kill you. And kill you horribly. So feminists don't insult Islam.
And another explanation might be incipient masochism that is the dark side of femininity, the way violence is the dark side of masculinity. All that bondage (the hijab) and domination (the harem) carries an erotic charge. Sometimes it's hard to listen to a Western guy joke about how good a Muslim man has it...
12
posted on
07/23/2006 7:17:26 PM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: ct235
"It is possible that the confrontation with Islamofascism will have the salutary effect of finally unmasking both the "feminists" (anti-American female leftists) and the political left (anti-civilization, America-hating sociopaths)."
It should already have done so. When we allow them to control the debate through PC multiculturalism, we allow that to continue.
13
posted on
07/23/2006 7:25:57 PM PDT
by
Peisistratus
(O xein angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti tede...)
To: Mordacious
The silence of the self-proclaimed/media-proclaimed "feminists", on the subject of the suppression of women by Islam, is criminal.
(Better?)
To: Fair Go
What makes me sick is they will use this to defend Sadaam Hussein. I've heard countless liberal females extoll Sadaam for his secular society where the women were 'free' and now Bush has removed him and all the women are in burkas and in fear for their life. It makes me want to gag.
They are such hypocrites.
15
posted on
07/23/2006 7:41:00 PM PDT
by
Elyse
To: Elyse
16
posted on
07/23/2006 7:47:36 PM PDT
by
Fair Go
To: Elyse
"I've heard countless liberal females extoll Sadaam for his secular society where the women were 'free' and now Bush has removed him and all the women are in burkas and in fear for their life."
They conveniently forget the rape rooms, don't they. They forget the actual MOS in the Iraqi "services" of "violator of women's honor". A professional rapist. All under "secular" (who wasn't all that secular when it suited him) Saddam. Not that the concept of a Shariah-governed Iraq or Afghanistan should be at all allowed by us, but please. It's never been about the fate of women in those countries with those people. It's about their hate of the highest civilization seen on this planet to date - the West. They want the more "authentic" tribal societies. Perhaps they secretly want to be property. Disgusting, the lot of them.
17
posted on
07/23/2006 7:52:46 PM PDT
by
Peisistratus
(O xein angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti tede...)
To: Dubya-M-Dees
18
posted on
07/23/2006 7:54:28 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(2 months and still no Bill from Congressman Pence. What is he milking squids for the ink?)
To: Peisistratus
They forget the actual MOS in the Iraqi "services" of "violator of women's honor". A professional rapist. I love to hit 'em with that one. Then just sit back and watch their empty heads explode. It's particular fun at parties.
Give it a try.
L
19
posted on
07/23/2006 7:56:00 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(2 months and still no Bill from Congressman Pence. What is he milking squids for the ink?)
To: Lurker
"I love to hit 'em with that one. Then just sit back and watch their empty heads explode. It's particular fun at parties."
Remember when Blair published that report? Why is that still ignored by the MSM? Oh, wait - I know why. The thing of it is - that status for women is ordained by the Koran. Property. A field to be plowed.
"Your wives are as a tilth (a field to be ploughed) unto you, so approach your tilth when or how ye will" - Surah 2:223
Property. Certainly not "wives obey your husbands, husbands respect your wives". Even in ancient Israel, women were better regarded.
20
posted on
07/23/2006 8:00:56 PM PDT
by
Peisistratus
(O xein angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti tede...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson