Posted on 07/29/2006 2:12:15 PM PDT by Vision
No, in reality.
Don't know. I wasn't talking about drunk driving.
Sorry wrong. Try again.
Yes, YOU are damned dead wrong; too bad you aren't man enough/intelligent enough to admit it.
Defending Mel Gibson against anti-semitic charges for making the Passion of the Christ wasn't wrong. I still don't think it was anti-semitic at all. I don't see where this poster defending Gibson so I don't get the whole 'exposed' thing. There's nothing to expose. Lots of freepers who didn't think the movie was anti-semitic think Gibson has issues with this drunk driving thing.
Amazing how people will still defend this man after this.
I defended Mel after Passion and I loved that movie but I have lost all respect for him now. What sort of Christian goes crazy drunk - calls everyone a Jew, says Jews are responsible for all wars, calls a female officer "sugar tits" etc... I need to change my signature I think
She has every right because this IS America. What "right" does some busybody have to make a comment? It wasn't in THEIR yard.
But that's just me - an average American.
If you are then we're in deeper trouble than we thought.
Wrong about what exactly?
He only owned up to half of what he did. He said nothing about his anti-semitic remarks and those were much more damaging and disgusting.
I told ya. I wasn't talking about drunk driving.
Your ignorant, continued denial of a factual statement. Pity that..........................
So you are calling a opinion of what a neo-CON is a "factual statement"? Not too bright of you. Typical Neo-CON behavior.
wow you are really something
Okay whatever. Your exposed comment doesn't make sense. I was just wondering what you meant.
Wow you have no clue who you are debating!
Make mincemeat out of them. I'm off to sleep :-)
Hildy is upset that Jews are dying in Lebanon, in Israel, in the United States, etc. She is also upset that hateful comments might incite others to act. Taking that into consideration, she is concerned about the safety of her family. Seems pretty easy to understand.
From this thread: Mel Gibson's statement on his DUI arrest
"I acted like a person completely out of control when I was arrested, and said things that I do not believe to be true and which are despicable. I am deeply ashamed of everything I said
Well I have a clue it's someone without a clue.
There is no such thing as "Typical neo-con behavior.", BTW. And I am NOT a neo-con at all; however, in the lowest ( and yes, mistaken some here throw that term around ), Ronald Reagan WAS a neo-con. Stick THAT in your pipe and smoke it; pet. ;^)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.