Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Taliban Terminator: Brit Sniper gets 39
The Sun (UK) ^ | 4th August 2006 | VIRGINIA WHEELER

Posted on 08/04/2006 12:15:58 PM PDT by Brit_Guy

A BRITISH sniper waging war on the Taliban is so deadly he has earned a chilling nickname — The Man Who Never Misses.

The unerring Army sharpshooter has killed 39 rebel fighters single-handedly.

His marksmanship is so lethal that rumours have spread like wildfire through insurgents’ camps, causing panic and confusion.

The sniper — who The Sun is not naming to prevent him becoming a target himself — is a member of elite 3 Para.

Described by sources as “the best shot in the Army” he is responsible for over five per cent of the 700 insurgents killed by Paras since British forces returned to Afghanistan.

He is based in the wild Helmand province, where our troops launched a massive assault on the Taliban this week.

A source said yesterday: “This sniper is truly something else — a silent assassin.

“In the deadly terrain of southern Afghanistan, where guerilla warfare rules, he has been invaluable. The rumours are sweeping enemy camps that he is the man who never misses.”

The sniper’s actual toll is probably higher than 39 but the Taliban’s tendency to reclaim bodies makes deaths difficult to confirm.

His lethal L96A1 rifle has a range of 1,000 yards and is fitted with electronic sights and laser range-finders.

He works with a partner called a spotter, who locates the target and helps judge wind speed and distance so the bullet travels accurately.

Each day the pair risk their lives away from fellow Paras, taking up covert positions and often lying hidden for as long as ten hours at a time. Once the shot has been fired they need nerves of steel to stay concealed while Taliban rebels wielding rocket-propelled grenades and machine-guns desperately try to hunt them down.

The Ministry of Defence would not discuss the crackshot for security reasons.

But he is regarded as one of the most successful British snipers since World War Two.

Earlier this year it was revealed that the Army is creating an elite force of almost 700 snipers, with all 38 infantry battalions required to have an 18-man platoon of sharpshooters by 2008. It will be the first time formal sniper platoons will have existed since the end of the First World War in 1918.

The decision follows the success of British and US sniper teams who have killed dozens of terrorists on recent operations in Afghanistan and Iraq.

In 2003 Royal Marines sniper Corporal Matt Hughes killed an Iraqi gunman from 900 yards with a “wonder shot” in which he aimed 56ft to the left and 35ft high to allow for wind.

The bullet’s trajectory was calculated by his spotter after he studied the movement of dust in the breeze. And Irish Guards Sergeant Eddie Waring lay on a roof for hours to take out three Iraqis who were laying mines in Basra.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; enemy; gunporn; gwot; killed; oef; sniper; uktroops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-144 next last
To: NonLinear
Theoretically speaking, you could take a rifle that's parallel to the ground and an object of any weight at the same height. As soon as the rifle was fired, the weight would then be dropped. The bullet and the weight would hit the ground at the same time.
121 posted on 08/04/2006 6:39:12 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

It doesn't matter if you shoot at an upward angle or a downward angle. The bullet will hit lower than if it was held horizonally.


122 posted on 08/04/2006 6:45:12 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0; Shooter 2.5
if he's sited in at 600 (which he should be) he'd only have 144 inches of drop (12 feet) at 900 yards. he'd have to be shooting up a mountain to shoot 35 feet high.

If he is sighted in at 600 yards, the barrel is tilted to shoot at a slightly upwards angle, and the scope is centered above the target to correct for the additional drop.

If he is sighted in for 900 yards, he has simply built in the anticipated 30+ ft drop into his trajectory, i.e. he has compensated for the same drop in advance rather than in situ. So his scope would be centered, although the barrel is raked at a somewhat higher angle.

So he is "shooting 35 ft high" in any case, but is only "aiming 35 ft high" if he was sighted in for a much closer range.
123 posted on 08/04/2006 7:05:56 PM PDT by NonLinear (He's dead, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: All

Here's a worthy organization that supports US (and I believe some UK) snipers and helps them get the super- specialized gear they need.
It's run by a bunch of current and former snipers, so they spend donated money very wisely. They don't draw any salaries either.
Cpt. AV and I got a thrill out of thinking about our money going for the scope some jihadi got nailed with.
http://americansnipers.org/
Mrs AV


124 posted on 08/04/2006 7:49:27 PM PDT by Atomic Vomit (www.aroostookbeauty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

quite possible, and if true, a heck of a shot.


1 inch at 100 meters is about a minute of angle.

high and low are pretty easy. the windage is tough, because the wind gusts in a way that is not completely predictable before the trigger is pulled.

Of course statistically, we get no information on his misses.

Now me: I would have had a mortar round on him in a few seconds. Nothing that can be done with a .30 caliber sniper round can't be done better with a 120mm mortar.


125 posted on 08/04/2006 7:52:30 PM PDT by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Deguello

Don't worry. The difference between a yard and a meter when it comes to judging distance is not important.

Generally newspaper accounts take the reported number of meters, and multiply by 3 to get feet four us on this side of the pond.


_"The aircraft missed the control tower by 3 feet."


126 posted on 08/04/2006 8:28:10 PM PDT by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: gafusa

Better would be tight communications to the mortar platoons.

If you think your enemy is impressed by a .50 caliber round, think what a GUIDED 120mm Mortar will do for them.


127 posted on 08/04/2006 8:30:12 PM PDT by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: All

128 posted on 08/04/2006 8:33:04 PM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: gafusa

Most infantry units already have mortars.

Rather than give away the sniper location, it would be better to call in a Mortar.

There are exceptions, but Mortars are responsive, long range, and lethal. (7000 meter range).


129 posted on 08/04/2006 8:35:12 PM PDT by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: sean327

I understand a Union officer said "At this range they couldn't hit an elephant!" just before catching a round in his head.

Anyone can get long range hits. Some just have to shoot more.


130 posted on 08/04/2006 8:36:47 PM PDT by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

The Army is also adding a mortar section to each company. Each new new infantry company is supposed to have infantry platoons, a mortar section, a medvac team, an sniper team, mobile guns, and a fire support team to help the mortars target.


131 posted on 08/04/2006 9:07:52 PM PDT by gafusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: 1L

I left the military 12 years ago. They did a heck of a job with the 308. I don't see anything magic about the round though, they used a bolt action. With a bolt action, you could choose about any caliber you want without the issues of developing a semiauto action for an extralong cartridge.


132 posted on 08/04/2006 10:41:04 PM PDT by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

Comment #133 Removed by Moderator

To: dangerdoc

Back in the Carter Administration we got M-1D Garands for our snipers. They used .30/06 rounds. That gave them about 100 ft per second higher velocity than the 7.62X51 rounds we used in the M-60 machineguns. Course each M113 track has a M-2 .50BMG machinegun and "DRAGON antitank missles (replaced the 90mm recoilless)

Oh, and each company had 81mm smoothbore mortars and a section of TOW Missiles

Battalion had 4.2 inch rifled mortars (107mm),
and a platoon of TOW missiles to supplement the Redeye platoon which provided our primary air defense.

Tough with an infantry squad back then. You had to keep your men in 7.62mmX51 NATO, .50BMG, 5.56X45 as well as LAW, Dragon, and 40mm grenades...


134 posted on 08/05/2006 10:09:11 AM PDT by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: mikeybaby

You need a bigger barn? Better chance of a score if you stand INSIDE?


135 posted on 08/10/2006 3:04:45 AM PDT by Nosler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

Yep, we'll all need a licence soon to pass wind in a public place.


136 posted on 08/10/2006 3:06:41 AM PDT by Nosler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ConservaTexan

That's Sniping......most civies would not comprehend the capacities of well trained and properly equipped Snipers Teams, whatever nationality they may be.


137 posted on 08/10/2006 3:12:25 AM PDT by Nosler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MAD-AS-HELL

You need some self control.


138 posted on 08/10/2006 3:14:30 AM PDT by Nosler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nosler
Yuo don't say?
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
139 posted on 08/10/2006 4:04:09 AM PDT by MAD-AS-HELL (Put a mirror to the face of the republican party and all you'll see is a Donkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Deguello

My ballistics program shows & assuming: 150 grn x FMJBT @ 2900fps and zeroed at 100yds drops 278" (23.16 feet)@ 900yds. Terminal energy is 503ft/Lbs (ex 2800ft/Lbs at muzzle). As for windage.... to drift 56 feet at 900 suggests wind speeds at 68mph!! Maybe a little 'Press Licence' exists here, but not impossible.
Whatever, these are shots which skilled Sniper Teams are capable.


140 posted on 08/10/2006 4:09:17 AM PDT by Nosler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson