"I get comments that the prevalence of HIV/AIDS is overestimated because of the lack of HIV serology, and that the real numbers are obscured by TB, malaria, etc. Kenya has some real numbers, now."
If the new, lower numbers are closer to correct, then it seems that it was indeed the case that the real numbers were previously obscured.
I thought the point was noteworthy not for the true prevalence of HIV/AIDS in Kenya, but for the fact that they have now positive HIV serology for Duesberg et al. and their fellow deniers.
BTW, once they have adequate lab support, they can also rule out the other diagnoses with similar symptoms.