Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: seutonius1234
Missouri is the latest front in the Republican Partys campaign to use photo ID requirements to suppress voting. T Unfreaking real! Suppress voting? How about make sure the person is QUALIFIED to vote? The nation has gone mad I tell you!
2 posted on
08/10/2006 4:57:33 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(Thank God the Brits don't have a New York Times!)
To: seutonius1234
Hello,
Bite me, NYTimes. ....
The people you are crying about manage to get ID for Social Services (ie: free money). Use it to vote. Oh, I get it, you want to vote more than once, or have dead Grandma vote (also more than once). Anger growing here, on many fronts.
Glad to be here, MOgirl
3 posted on
08/10/2006 4:59:31 PM PDT by
MOgirl
(Democrats: The Culture of Treason (and you know what I'm talkin about!))
To: seutonius1234
They always seem to have sufficient ID to collect welfare, medicaid, social security benefits, etc. Why is it that suddenly because they have to ID themselves at the voting booth, it becomes a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy?
To: seutonius1234
One very interesting thing about the Mexican Election held in Mexico a few weeks ago:
ALL MEXICAN VOTERS HAD TO HAVE A VALID GOVERNMENT APPROVED ID TO VOTE - EVEN POOR PEOPLE (and there are a lot of poor people in Mexico).
6 posted on
08/10/2006 5:01:50 PM PDT by
Mogollon
To: rface; bluesagewoman
9 posted on
08/10/2006 5:04:41 PM PDT by
VOA
To: seutonius1234
The Dems in the urban areas of MO have been committing vote fraud is such a wholesale fashion for so long, that they are terrified of being called on it. They would crumble if they were forced to give up their scams and intimidation tactics.
I know quite a few people here in StL that would vote for conservative candidates but don't bother to, unless it's a national or close statewide issue. The recent stories have been bad enough but I've heard some real horror stories from old timers here.
10 posted on
08/10/2006 5:04:53 PM PDT by
Uriah_lost
(http://www.wingercomics.com/d/20051205.html)
To: seutonius1234
"but that claim falls apart on close inspection. Missouris new ID rules and similar ones adopted last year in Indiana and Georgia are intended to deter voting by blacks, poor people and other groups that are less likely to have drivers licenses"
Tell that to Mexico.
They are much poorer, and even less educated, and yet they require strong id's before you can vote.
And the poor have had no problem voting there.
12 posted on
08/10/2006 5:05:47 PM PDT by
Jameison
To: seutonius1234
"are intended to deter voting by blacks, poor people and other groups that are less likely to have drivers licenses"
Hey Washington Post,what do them oh so poor black folks use to collect all them government benefits then?
13 posted on
08/10/2006 5:08:02 PM PDT by
Jameison
To: seutonius1234
Without a state issued ID or passport or other picture ID one cannot buy beer, whiskey, cigs, cigars, snuff, or whatever. This crap by the anti-American left about voter ID (we here in Florida must show picture ID) is trying to make sure that their voters can vote early and often as they have in most of the Democrat won elections. If you do not have an ID then you should not be allowed to vote period.
14 posted on
08/10/2006 5:08:44 PM PDT by
YOUGOTIT
To: seutonius1234
[Missourians who have drivers licenses will have little trouble voting, but many who do not will have to go to considerable trouble to get special IDs.]
BULL!
These laws requiring government issued photo ID's to vote all contain provisions for making it ridiculously easy for any eligible voter to obtain one. The government will even pay for it and deliver it to people on demand. If you're too f****** lazy to pry their butt off the sofa long enough to get an ID card to prove you're an eligible voter, then America is better off with you NOT voting.
And claiming that the people who are trying to stop election fraud are just a bunch of racists by making sure that every voter is an eligible voter is abominable.
17 posted on
08/10/2006 5:11:50 PM PDT by
spinestein
(Follow The Brazen Rule)
To: seutonius1234
When I voted on this past Tuesday I went in with only my registration card and my DL. I handed both to the woman to look me up in her book. She handed me back my DL and said we don't need this today but will in November.
I thanked her and said I came prepared.
Now how anyone can do anything in this state without some kind of photo ID is living in a world I would not know how to find.
To: seutonius1234
They'd whine about the purple inked fingers to limit votes to one to a customer, too!
21 posted on
08/10/2006 5:12:48 PM PDT by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help m)
To: seutonius1234
What a bunch of bullship. How can anyone not despise the Slimes when that is the crud they put out?
:(
26 posted on
08/10/2006 5:21:22 PM PDT by
Past Your Eyes
(Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
To: seutonius1234
No ID -
Can't cash a check
Can't buy smokes
Can't buy a drink
Can't get on a plane
Hello. How is there a rational argument that these ID requirements regarding racial inequality.
27 posted on
08/10/2006 5:21:27 PM PDT by
rwilson99
(R) South Park)
To: seutonius1234
Voter eligibility in Missouri bump! Great news!
28 posted on
08/10/2006 5:28:45 PM PDT by
PGalt
To: seutonius1234
More than a century of Demo fraud in St. Louis is about to come to an end. A new era.
Bill Clay....check up on your retirement account.
29 posted on
08/10/2006 5:30:25 PM PDT by
TexanToTheCore
(This space for hire...)
To: seutonius1234; All
IS THE NYT ON CRACK?!!
Why do they constantly ignore the states that have had photo ID requirements FOR DECADES?!!!
Look at Hanging Chad FLORIDA where NOBODY complained about the photo ID requirement.
DOES ANYONE HAVE A MAP WHICH SHOWS A STATE BY STATE BREAKDOWN?
33 posted on
08/10/2006 5:35:49 PM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: seutonius1234
I would allow a liberal hardship exemption for picture ID's, that way there will be no excuse for it.
It's worth the cost.
34 posted on
08/10/2006 5:35:57 PM PDT by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: seutonius1234
The poor in the inner cities have a high motivation to vote, thus getting a free state ID card is not a significant impediment to casting a vote.
Maybe voter turnout will decrease from 110% to 105?
To: seutonius1234
If one wants to vote badly enough; go to the proper agency and get a driver license or a State picture I.D.
DUH!!!
38 posted on
08/10/2006 5:46:12 PM PDT by
no dems
(www.4condi.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson