George Bush: Darling of the Liberals (Lord Haw Haw Alert!)

Liberty Magazine ^ | August, 2006 | Jon Harrison

[kesg]

This has to be the single most misleading headline I have ever seen at Free Republic.

[going hot]

But he followed Afghanistan with Iraq. There he has given us a Vietnam in the desert, a folly to match LBJ’s foray in the jungle.

That kinda explains the author's mindset in a nutshell.

But then, you love to crawl out from under the rock every now and then with glee in posting this type of tripe.

[dirtboy]

"In the meantime, with an optimism that I confess is somewhat forced, I will offer a couple of very modest proposals. Don’t rush out and vote Republican."

Yeah, vote for the party that just shot its last national security hawk instead.

The wingnut right has the same cranial-rectal inversion problem as the left. I would venture that 97 percent of Freepers have issues with Bush's spending. And that two-thirds have problems with his stance on dealing with illegal immigrants.

But for cryin' out loud, for all the warts of the GOP, the alternative is the Dems, the Libertarians, and the Constitution Party, NONE OF WHICH is willing to grasp the complexities of asymmetrical warfare.

[thoughtomator]

Someone will post another Reuters story soon, don't worry.

[johnny7]

Ahem...

the author is from... VT.

[Bubba M. Aurelius]

The author of this article suffers from terminal myopia. Perhaps this clown would have felt more comfortable with Big Al or Brown Water Kerry. What a putz!

[xzins]

This guy and I radically differ on national security.

[pissant]

Snap out of it.

[jazusamo]

LOL...True, but consider the writer and the magazine, it's no surprise.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

The Medicare Part D plan will lower Medicare costs in the long run. Seniors/Disabled can manage their conditions cheaper with medication than going to their doctors everytime.

Plus everyone and their Momma knew that Bush was supportive of a drug plan way back in 2000 when he was running. For people to complain about it now is laughable. Seniors demanded it, the Dims already trotted out their "plan", and Bush had no choice but to create a plan as well. I'm not a fan of it either but my part-time job (where I'm at right now) is answering calls for the Medicare D plan. At least it's run by the private insurance companies though.

[woofie]

Why am I not suprised you posted this?

[BW2221]

The magazine is obviously written by Libertarians, for Libertarians. That's probably why it criticizes Bush for his stand on drugs rather than border security, which is a major criticism among conservatives.

[Republican Wildcat]

Couldn't be said any better.

[kesg]

:)

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

The magazine is obviously written by Libertarians, for Libertarians. That's probably why it criticizes Bush for his stand on drugs rather than border security, which is a major criticism among conservatives.

Which is why Libertarians will never win office higher than trash collector. Maybe if they ran as Republicans, dropped the WOD/open borders schtick, and focus on their strengths (limited gov't) they'd get somewhere.

[ExcursionGuy84]

Sign me up for your platoon, 'cause I'm in your camp.

[johnny7]

The poor bugger's had it for a while... beastly way to bow out.

[COEXERJ145]

Taking another dirt nap I see.

[COEXERJ145]

She'll be back.