I don't due platitudes; I simply made a statement concerning the theory of evolution being unable to pass the test of the scientific method. My only issue is that, to date, no one can edify with a theory of evolution that does pass the test of the scientific method. You better show me where it has been documented and peer reviewed that it does NOT. But, if you must:
Is Evolution Science, and What Does 'Science' Mean?
As you can see, TToE passes EVERY possible definion of science and uses the scientific method.
Don't bring a moped to a car fight.
Somehow, I didn't see a theory of evolution actually posted in the article. I'm sure you will post it for me. The author never denies the need for falsification and actually makes a claim that the theory of evolution is indeed falsifiable; he just never states what is the theory. Additionally, even if true, falsification is only one part of the SM. Claiming something to be true and proving it are, as you well know, 2 different things.
Want to try again?
W.K.