[freedumb2003]

Please go back and re-read your post #85. "may be" is right there where you copied from my previous post.

Oh -- you were talking about your reference to ME (I believe you used "might be"). Here I thought you wanted to talk about the subject of your post, not silly name-calling. Had I realized your orientation, I would have been clearer on what I am saying.

I stand by what I posted about the theory of evolution.

Despite the fact I have provided a dead-bang direct refutation. Pretty standard for people like you.

[WhiteKnight]

Oh -- you were talking about your reference to ME (I believe you used "might be"). Here I thought you wanted to talk about the subject of your post, not silly name-calling. Had I realized your orientation, I would have been clearer on what I am saying.

Only responding to your post, if you don't like what you post or any one responding to it, I humbly suggest not posting it.

W.K.

[WhiteKnight]

Despite the fact I have provided a dead-bang direct refutation.

Certainly dead, not sure about bang, but hardly a refutation.

Pretty standard for people like you.

Nice generalization; I'm sure you can tell me what I'm like.

W.K.