Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tamar1973
I don't see a problem with the (even if it is almost non-existent) profiling because it would be better than staying blind to telltale factors. Regardless of whether they can recruit nontraditionals, keeping an eye on the traditionals while also spending the resources in finding the non-traditionals would still net terrorists still trying to slip through.

During the cold war, the US was always evolving and advancing their technology, especially in ECM and radar technology. The Russians did this too, but they also never threw anything away. The low frequency radars from the 50s became the stealth hunters in the 90s. The US? They dropped much of that in the 70s and 80s.....

72 posted on 09/04/2006 3:11:53 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer
I don't see a problem with the (even if it is almost non-existent) profiling because it would be better than staying blind to telltale factors.

The problem is that none of the 9-11 attackers had these "telltale factors". They were not bearded, skullcap wearing, robed folks. None of them dressed as conservative Muslims. They were dressed like regular Americans living regular lives.

137 posted on 09/04/2006 5:15:25 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson