Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Noah's Ark Discovered ... Again and Again
Skeptical Inquirer ^ | 9-5-06 | Benjamin Radford

Posted on 09/05/2006 10:47:39 AM PDT by Central Scrutiniser

In this world there are things that seem on the verge of being discovered every so often, yet never quite materialize. The "Lost City" of Atlantis, for example, has been "found" at least a half dozen times. One researcher is pretty sure it is in Bolivia; another says it is Antarctica; a third claims that Bimini beachrock may be from the lost civilization. So it is with Noah's Ark. The difference is, of course, that the implications of Noah's Ark actually being found extend far beyond archaeology. The weight of all the paired animals in the world is nothing compared to the religious freight that the Ark carries. The Ark story is scientifically implausible; there simply wouldn't be enough space on the boat to accommodate two of every living animal (including dinosaurs), along with the food and water necessary to keep them alive. Furthermore, constructing a vessel of that scale would take hundreds of workers months to complete.

(Excerpt) Read more at livescience.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: dontfeedthetrolls; fables; isthistrollbadsanta; noahsark; trollthread; whatever
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-250 next last
To: Central Scrutiniser
Glad you weren't in Jonestown, Guyana in the late 70's.

Careful, CS...next time it may be someone in a white lab coat who offers you the Kool-Ade.

81 posted on 09/05/2006 11:58:29 AM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

No, evidently people here feel you can't be skeptical about something religiously based. Do you feel that way?

All them Jim Jones followers sure weren't skeptical at all were they?


82 posted on 09/05/2006 11:59:24 AM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (I was in the house when the house burnt down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

I started in Showroom Stock with a Spitfire 1500. Ended up in an F-Prod 1300 Spitfire. Finished with the HSR in the '90s when my well-loved British cast-iron could not compete with what effectively were Japanese exotics in F-Prod.

< sigh >

Those days are over. kids. houses. college. elderly parents. you know the drill.

BTW, the moniker "Blueflag" originated in the 1st year of my racing career - I saw the blue flag A LOT. In my last four years, though, I never finished out of the medals, and the blue flag was for the other guys.


83 posted on 09/05/2006 12:00:16 PM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
All them Jim Jones followers sure weren't skeptical at all were they?

Nor are you, where the non-existence of Noah's Ark is concerned. It's the assumption that appears to be your entire thesis, as far as this thread is concerned.

Keep going, CS. Be passionate. We love it when people believe passionately.

84 posted on 09/05/2006 12:02:13 PM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido; Central Scrutiniser
Maybe, but we're not talking about the existence of God, we're talking about literal interpretation versus metaphor.

Some are, but not all. It's one thing to believe that there's a God and that He expressed some things in figurative language that doesn't factually describe events. CS, on the other hand, clearly denies the existence of anything supernatural and has merely picked the Ark as his preferred rhetorical battleground.

85 posted on 09/05/2006 12:03:50 PM PDT by Sloth ('It Takes A Village' is problematic when you're raising your child in Sodom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: No Blue States

LOL 8^)
Thanks!


86 posted on 09/05/2006 12:04:03 PM PDT by jonno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

You did it a lot longer than I did. I finally crashed the Sprite in a race, and that was that. I never finished in the medals at all, but I sure had fun. I paid a guy $500 for that Sprite, and never touched it. After I crashed it, I sold it to another Sprite owner for $300. Hilarious fun. Too bad it's all done.

These days, it's just too expensive to race, it seems to me, and I'm too darned old. 1965 seems like an awfully long time ago.


87 posted on 09/05/2006 12:05:36 PM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

There is more physical evidence of the existence of dragons than there is the ark.


88 posted on 09/05/2006 12:05:55 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

No, I am openly asking people to prove it to me.

That no one can, should tell you something. Show me how it happened and give me the proof and I will believe it. You sure dodge the question when you are asked for some proof.


89 posted on 09/05/2006 12:07:54 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (I was in the house when the house burnt down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
The ARK is in my back yard in dense forest I don't want the world to know otherwise they will be stomping my flower beds to get a peek.
90 posted on 09/05/2006 12:08:59 PM PDT by bikerman (Democrats the cut and run party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

No, I don't deny the existence of anything supernatural. I posted this article because it documents the scams and hoaxes revolving around the Ark, and how gullible believers got taken for a ride.

But, based upon all the evidence (or lack thereof), I have to conclude that there was no ark and that it was merely a fable. If you have proof otherwise, please present it.


91 posted on 09/05/2006 12:09:48 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (I was in the house when the house burnt down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
Theoretically, I would say its possible and that it probably exists due to the data we have. We haven't seen it yet however.

What data? What evidence do you have to assert that extra-terrestrial life "probably" exists?

Compare and contrast to the ark, theoretically it is not possible

You're misusing the word "theoretically."

and there is no proof that it could be possible nor is there any observable results that we would expect to see from it.

What, exactly, are the expected "observable results" from the existence of a wooden boat thousands of years ago?

BTW, not an attack on people of faith, just pointing out the fact that several people claiming to find the ark were con men and that the CBS story was pure hoax.

Bull. Yes, there were con men & AFAIK, no ark has ever been located. But that is just your springboard for calling theists idiots.

92 posted on 09/05/2006 12:09:56 PM PDT by Sloth ('It Takes A Village' is problematic when you're raising your child in Sodom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Rodm

..........and those damn mosquitos.


93 posted on 09/05/2006 12:10:47 PM PDT by osideplanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
Being a Scrutinizer myself, the unavoidable conclusion one reaches is this: the more we learn, the more we realize we don't know that much.

There are so many thing about our own past that we are at a loss to understand, and our explanations are nothing more that fables....
94 posted on 09/05/2006 12:12:05 PM PDT by statered ("And you know what I mean.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
No, I am openly asking people to prove it to me.

Your argument is flawed. Science cannot "prove" a miracle.
95 posted on 09/05/2006 12:12:38 PM PDT by Hoboto (I blame Hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
I have to conclude that there was no ark

Not that it matters, but what is the meaning of the story? If it didn't actually happen the story must be there for a purpose. What is the purpose? That's really two questions, or really four since the meaning is on three levels besides the narrative itself. If you need time to bone up on Hebrew and Greek, go ahead and take the time.

96 posted on 09/05/2006 12:13:41 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

I would say it probably exists based upon the vast size of the universe, the number of solar systems like ours, etc. I think its Drake's equation, look it up.

The observable results for the ark story would be fossil remains of non native species from where the ark landed to where the animals are now (koala's in Europe, kangaroos, etc), as well as a valid explantion of how all the animals got home when there was no food and how they managed to populate the entire species based upon only one male and one female representative, without chromosonal damage based upon the inbreeding that had to occur from such a scenario.

Show me the proof that I just asked for. I am not calling theists idiots, evidently you feel overly defensive about it.


97 posted on 09/05/2006 12:14:03 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (I was in the house when the house burnt down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
No, I don't deny the existence of anything supernatural.

Of course you do. You flatly state that a particular claim is false, because a satisfactory naturalistic explanation cannot be provided. And you have already expressed your contempt for the notion of 'miracles.' If you allowed for the possibility of supernatural intervention, then you'd have done neither.

98 posted on 09/05/2006 12:14:29 PM PDT by Sloth ('It Takes A Village' is problematic when you're raising your child in Sodom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Its all greek to me. There were lots of fables to teach people, same goes with Jonah living inside a whale, a nice story, but implausable.


99 posted on 09/05/2006 12:15:10 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (I was in the house when the house burnt down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
Matthew 24. "But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.

Christ mentioned the flood, He also mentioned that he would rise from the dead. After he was killed his followers ran away and hid for their lives.
They stopped hiding after He came to them after he died. His formerly cowardly band of followers died saying Christ rose from the dead.
I'm going to take Christ's word on Noah no matter who tells me it was just a story to teach people.
There are allot of things that can't be understood. I've had stuff happen to me that seemed miraculous. I don't know why they happen, but I never deny that they did.

100 posted on 09/05/2006 12:15:35 PM PDT by The Brush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-250 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson