Posted on 09/06/2006 7:09:04 AM PDT by Pharmboy
If one looks around in Ca., the SW of the USA and some areas in the NE, I was astonished that any whites were available for the polling and study! And as far as cultural contributions, history books in the public schools have all but erased those of Anglos, white Europeans who after all are just old white dead guys.
Nice to know that Southerners are classified and lumped into the category of racial phobics. These pinheads who did this survey are full of bull fertilizer!
No, Homer Simpson is yellow.
Is there a drop-off box where I can return them?
Hoover Institute
http://www.hoover.org/publications/he/2896296.html
Race, Culture, and Equality
Thomas Sowell
Executive Summary
In his remarks at the Commonwealth Club of California on June 18, 1998, Thomas Sowell discussed the conclusions he reached after spending fifteen years researching the economic and social impacts of cultural differences among peoples and nations around the world. This essay, Race, Culture, and Equality, distills the results found in the trilogy that was published during these years---Race and Culture (1994), Migrations and Cultures (1996), and Conquests and Cultures (1998).
The most obvious and inescapable finding from these years of research is that huge disparities in income and wealth have been the rule, not the exception, in countries around the world and over centuries of human history. Real income consists of outputs and these outputs have been radically different because the inputs have been radically different from peoples with different cultures.
Geography alone creates profound differences among peoples. It is not simply that such natural wealth as oil and gold are very unequally distributed around the world. More fundamentally, people themselves are different because of different levels of access to other peoples and cultures. Isolated peoples have always lagged behind those with greater access to a wider world, whether isolation has been the result of mountains, jungles, widely scattered islands or other geographic barriers.
Cities have been in the vanguard of cultural, technological and economic progress in virtually every civilization. But the geographic settings in which cities flourish are by no means equally distributed around the globe. Urbanization has been correspondingly unequally developed in different geographic regions--most prevalent among the networks of navigable waterways in Western Europe and least prevalent where such waterways are most lacking in tropical Africa.
If geography is not egalitarian, neither is demography. When the median age of Jews in the United States is 20 years older than the median age of Puerto Ricans, then there is no way that these two groups could be equally represented in jobs requiring long years of experience, in retirement homes or in sports. Even if they were identical in every other way, radically different age distributions would prevent their being equal in incomes or occupations.
Discrimination is also one of the many factors operating against equality. But even if all human beings behaved like saints toward one another, the other factors would still make equality of income and wealth virtually impossible to achieve.
Neither geography nor history can be undone but we can at least avoid artificially creating cultural isolation under glittering names like "multiculturalism."
Click on link for Essay & Notes
The point is that large numbers/proportions of the Asian applicants were getting 1600 on their SAT's.
That's called "driven".
Little story (true one): The son of a former co-worker of mine was a student at Texas A&M 15-20 years ago. He was a hard enough worker, spent plenty of time in the A&M library. One night he was studying there and missed hearing the closing bell, lost in study, and got himself locked in. Suddenly the lights went out, and the emergency/night lights came on. He looked around, and suddenly realized that under every one of the night lights, squarely in the middle of their little pools of floodlight, was an Asian student. They'd been sitting and studying in those spots all evening, and he hadn't thought anything of it. But then he realized that every one of them had chosen those spots hours before, right under the lights. That was when he realized that these people were fanatics, and that they were competing with him at that level. Or more to the point, they weren't competing with him any more. That story was already over.
So I wonder, is it time to say hello to our future, meritocratic policy elite, the successors to the "neocons"? If so, the good news is, there won't be any mortal conflict with China. The Chinese over there and the Chinese over here will come up with a friendly solution to all outstanding issues and problems, and implement it so smoothly that we'll never even hear the click.
If you're white, you're right, you're out of sight.
If you're yellow, how mellow, you're one of the fellows.
If you're brown, stick around; there's room for you in town.
But if you're black, God help you, get back!
The reference was to shadings of skin tone among the "colored" (black) community. Or, as Ellison was pointing out, not-so-community.
Jamaican society in the 19th and early 20th centuries was ruled by skin tone disguised as a "class" system. The boundary between "colored" and "white", however, was somewhat permeable. The son of an person who was only 1/8th African ("octoroon") and another who was white was called "statutory white" and could "pass" in theory.
This system of deflecting racial identity and turning it into a class system was threatened by the arrival of Marcus Garvey. It was the elite of "colored" society who drove Garvey out of Jamaica, whereupon he came to America to preach racial separatism and begin his "back to Africa" movement.
The Jamaican shadings of color, however, paled next to the excimiating recordation of every possible combination of ethnicities in Spanish-speaking New World societies, which had over 40 different words for different admixtures of black, white, and Amerindian parentage -- which were recorded on baptismal certificates, and affixed to their owners for life, determining their place in society. Such words as cholo, cimarron, chino, jibaro, salta atras, tente in el aire, albino, mestizo, negro fino, ochavado, pardo, prieto, cuatrero, and many, many more were used to fix a person's place in the demographic spectrum of the Spanish Empire and its successor societies.
And chicanos call whites "racist".
Yup, time for another round of scab-picking over skin color.
What race am I?
Human.
I first heard it on the job in early seventies in Harlem.
I read Ellison but couldn't get past the noble suffering. Chester Himes was to my mind a better window into that part of our society at that time.
Chester Himes....a Black Raymond Chandler with a sense of humor. He wrote 'Blind Man with a Pistol' and 'Cotton Comes to Harlem' among others. Worth checking out for a look at that world in that time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.