Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Silverback
"Since he was doing neither of those, your argument is irrelevant"

Ummm the crew has stated for the record they hemmed in the ray causing it to defend itself, which would fall under the harassment part of the statement.

191 posted on 09/06/2006 11:53:09 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg ("`Eddies,' said Ford, `in the space-time continuum.' `Ah,' nodded Arthur, `is he? Is he?'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawgg

"Ummm the crew has stated for the record they hemmed in the ray causing it to defend itself, which would fall under the harassment part of the statement."

Not true based on the statements made by the film crew.


205 posted on 09/07/2006 7:36:15 AM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

To: Mad Dawgg
Two guys does not constitute "hemming in" or harassment. If it did, there'd be hundreds of stings a year in Stingray City. Just because the animal misinterpreted the situation doesn't mean that they were doing something stupid, it just means the animal misinterpreted their intent.

I'm sure Germaine Greer would agree with your analysis (especially the part where you speak for Bindi Irwin, nice touch) and would also love to discuss this with you while she's making you breakfast. Hasta la vista.

208 posted on 09/07/2006 10:03:05 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (NewsMax gives aid and comfort to the enemy-- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1642052/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson