To: Mr. Silverback
"Since he was doing neither of those, your argument is irrelevant" Ummm the crew has stated for the record they hemmed in the ray causing it to defend itself, which would fall under the harassment part of the statement.
191 posted on
09/06/2006 11:53:09 PM PDT by
Mad Dawgg
("`Eddies,' said Ford, `in the space-time continuum.' `Ah,' nodded Arthur, `is he? Is he?'")
To: Mad Dawgg
"Ummm the crew has stated for the record they hemmed in the ray causing it to defend itself, which would fall under the harassment part of the statement."
Not true based on the statements made by the film crew.
To: Mad Dawgg
Two guys does not constitute "hemming in" or harassment. If it did, there'd be hundreds of stings a year in Stingray City. Just because the animal misinterpreted the situation doesn't mean that they were doing something stupid, it just means the animal misinterpreted their intent.
I'm sure Germaine Greer would agree with your analysis (especially the part where you speak for Bindi Irwin, nice touch) and would also love to discuss this with you while she's making you breakfast. Hasta la vista.
208 posted on
09/07/2006 10:03:05 AM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(NewsMax gives aid and comfort to the enemy-- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1642052/posts)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson