Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beretta Backers Beat Down the .45 Revival
Strategy Page ^ | 9/25/06 | n/a

Posted on 09/25/2006 10:46:11 AM PDT by kiriath_jearim

September 24, 2006: Earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Defense began a search for a new .45 caliber combat pistol. Now that search has been mysteriously called off. The Department of Defense has announced, without any explanation, that is no longer looking for a new combat pistol.

Last January, after two decades of use, the U.S. Department of Defense appeared to be getting rid of its Beretta M9 9mm pistol, and going back to the 11.4mm (.45 caliber) weapon. There have been constant complaints about the lesser (compared to the .45) hitting power of the 9mm, as well as reliability problems with the Beretta. And in the last few years, SOCOM (Special Operations Command) and the marines have officially adopted .45 caliber pistols as "official alternatives" to the M9 Beretta.

Back in January, SOCOM was given the task of finding a design that will be suitable as the JCP (Joint Combat Pistol). Various designs were to be evaluated, but all had to be .45 caliber and have a eight round magazine (at least), and high capacity mags holding up to 15. The new .45 was also to have a rail up top for attachments, and be able to take a silencer. Length was to be no more than 9.65 inches, and width no more than 1.53 inches.

The M1911 .45 caliber pistol that the 9mm Beretta replaced in 1985, was, as its nomenclature implied, an old design. There are several modern designs out there for .45 caliber pistols that are lighter, carry more ammo and are easier to maintain than the pre-World War I M1911 (which is actually about a century old, as a design). The Department of Defense planned to buy 645,000 JCPs. But now, the troops are being told to keep their 9mm Berettas, and all the complaints they have about those weapons.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: banglist; gunporn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: kiriath_jearim
I have both a Berretta 92FS and an H&K USP .45 tactical. I would prefer the H&K hands down. I love my Berretta, but the H&K is simply better. My only knock against the H&K is it's a little bulky.
21 posted on 09/25/2006 11:00:39 AM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

A small handgun is much better than no handgun at all and just some harsh words.


22 posted on 09/25/2006 11:01:04 AM PDT by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Armedanddangerous

I am wondering if this is a cost per bullet issue?


How many types of bullets does the military use? (I remember a history chanel special showing how the japanese during WWII were crippled by their wide variety of bullet needs)


23 posted on 09/25/2006 11:02:21 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
"Didn't "M" admonish James Bond for carrying a Beretta because it lacked stopping power? "

Not to mention that the clip keeps falling out too.

24 posted on 09/25/2006 11:04:39 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
Yes. M's assistant from Q branch said the department viewed 007's .25 cal. pistol as a "ladies' gun, sir."

Time to un-pimp your gun, sir. LOL

25 posted on 09/25/2006 11:06:06 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Dust off the ol'e 10mm and be done with the arguments.


26 posted on 09/25/2006 11:08:46 AM PDT by n230099 ("If the creator had a purpose in equipping us with a neck, he surely meant us to stick it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Gunfighting rule #23 "Do not attend a gun fight with a handgun whose caliber does not start with a '4.'"
http://www.thegunzone.com/gunfighting.html


27 posted on 09/25/2006 11:09:33 AM PDT by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tigtog

I think it has to do with incidents of soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan shooting bad guys with their berettas, loaded with pathetic 9mm full metal jacket ball ammunition, and having to follow up with five and six extra shots to make the bad guy dead.


28 posted on 09/25/2006 11:10:15 AM PDT by Armedanddangerous (The first rule in a gunfight is to have a gun, more than one, if possible..bring a shotgun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

I own a couple... better than a .25 and about the same knockdown as a .38 Special. It is a backup caliber, but 007 was superhuman, so he didn't need more firepower! ;-)

LLS


29 posted on 09/25/2006 11:10:38 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Naw..its a one-shot stopper issue.


30 posted on 09/25/2006 11:12:15 AM PDT by Armedanddangerous (The first rule in a gunfight is to have a gun, more than one, if possible..bring a shotgun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tigtog

Dear TT,
I hope ypou are right. Replacing the .45 ACP with the 9mm was fixing a problem that didn't exist. My son has friends in Marine Force Recon. They have a smorgasbord of weapons to select and train with and carry into harm's way. None carry a 9mm.


31 posted on 09/25/2006 11:12:49 AM PDT by JeeperFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: weps4ret

Yep, the SIG-226 in 40 caliber with the DAK trigger.


32 posted on 09/25/2006 11:12:54 AM PDT by Armedanddangerous (The first rule in a gunfight is to have a gun, more than one, if possible..bring a shotgun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RKV

Breaking that rule did not hurt James Butler Hickock, but sitting at the wrong place on the card table did.


33 posted on 09/25/2006 11:14:42 AM PDT by FNG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
And there are glocks out there with external safeties. Iv'e seen photos of them.

ping for a Glock statement. Is this true? After market addition?

34 posted on 09/25/2006 11:15:17 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
The M1911 .45 caliber pistol that the 9mm Beretta replaced in 1985, was, as its nomenclature implied, an old design. There are several modern designs out there for .45 caliber pistols that are lighter, carry more ammo and are easier to maintain than the pre-World War I M1911 (which is actually about a century old, as a design). The Department of Defense planned to buy 645,000 JCPs. But now, the troops are being told to keep their 9mm Berettas, and all the complaints they have about those weapons.

Does no one remember September 11, 2001 when America was attacked by Islamic terrorists?

In 1898 the U.S Armed Forces carried .38 revolver

.38 caliber is .357

9 mm is .355

During the Spanish-American war the .38 caliber proved insufficient to stop Islamic terrorists in the Philippines

.45 caliber ACP was chosen, Browning designed a sidearm to stop Islamic Terrorists.

It seems that DoD has forgotten one hundred years of history.

The 1911 pistol may be 100 years old, but stopping Islamic Terrorists has remained the same.

OBTW; Think of this question : is Islamic Terrorist redundant ?


35 posted on 09/25/2006 11:15:26 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 144:1 Praise be to YHvH, my Rock, who trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

The Mark 23 is by Heckler&Koch, not US either.


36 posted on 09/25/2006 11:15:32 AM PDT by Recon Dad (Marine Spec Ops Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
Ridiculous.

The sidearm has a neglible contribution to a platoon's fire power. What the DoD needs to do is come up with a real rifle and squad MG before worrying about handguns.

Those who NEED sidearms (Special Operations) are authotized to procure whatever they wish anyway.
37 posted on 09/25/2006 11:16:55 AM PDT by struwwelpeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
is Islamic Terrorist redundant ?

Yes. There have, from time to time, been Communist terrorists, National Socialist terrorists, and various terrorists involved with nationalist movements that are/were not particularly ideological.

38 posted on 09/25/2006 11:17:52 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

I guess I should say "No, it's not redundant. There have been &c"


39 posted on 09/25/2006 11:18:32 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: tigtog

I feel the same way. Very recently I was told that various .45's were being tested. Glocks were one of the pistols being tested. I will be very surprised if this turns out to be the final word on this issue.


40 posted on 09/25/2006 11:18:40 AM PDT by Recon Dad (Marine Spec Ops Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson