Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WSJ: Democrats on al Qaeda (+ Ramirez cartoon)
Wall Street Journal ^ | October 2, 2006 | Editorial

Posted on 10/02/2006 5:33:29 AM PDT by OESY

Democrats keep insisting that, whatever their opposition to the war in Iraq, they'd be as tough as anyone in fighting al Qaeda. We'd love to believe this for the country's sake, but then what are Americans to make of last week's Congressional vote on detainee interrogation and military tribunals?

The bill was a compromise between the White House and three GOP Senators who Democrats had been hailing as voices of independent courage only days earlier. But rather than endorse this deal that put limits on interrogation methods (see nearby), Democrats in both houses voted overwhelmingly no. In the House, only 34 Democrats supported the bill, most of those from the South or rural areas, while the entire leadership and 160 Democrats voted no.

Over in the Senate, 32 Democrats opposed the bill, including the leadership and everyone who's been mentioned as a potential Presidential candidate in 2008: Hillary Clinton, Evan Bayh, John Kerry, Joe Biden, Chris Dodd, Russ Feingold. The dozen who voted yes are either up for re-election or from swing states. If an election weren't coming, we doubt there'd have even been that many. The Democratic "ayes" included Senate candidates Sherrod Brown of Ohio and Debbie Stabenow of Michigan, both partisan liberals on all issues except, suddenly, this one.

This amazing vote only reinforces the Republican argument that, given the chance, Democrats would return to the pre-9/11, law-enforcement model of fighting terrorism. In voting "no," they were opposing aggressive interrogation of even the worst al Qaeda captives. If Democrats fall short of regaining Congress this year, votes like this will be the reason.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; democrats; nationalsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: OESY

Let's see where some Brooklyn Dems stand:
1. My congressman, Major Owens, told me that terrorism should be handled as a "law enforcement problem."
2. David Yassky, failed candidate to replace Owens, advocated stronger gun control laws as a way to foil the terrorists. His second idea was a census of senior citizens.
3. Yvette Clarke, who defeated Yassky, campaigned with John Murtha.

Feel safer yet?


21 posted on 10/02/2006 6:43:51 AM PDT by joylyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Already had that (excellent) one set for Today's Toons 10/4/06...thanks!


22 posted on 10/02/2006 8:52:58 AM PDT by pookie18 ([Hillary Rotten] Clinton Happens...as does Dr. Demento Dean, Bela Pelosi & Benedick Durbin!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Cox & Forkum?


23 posted on 10/02/2006 3:34:41 PM PDT by SICSEMPERTYRANNUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson