Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
The Drudge Report ^ | 10-04-06 | Drudge

Posted on 10/04/2006 5:12:16 PM PDT by jrooney

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 1,401-1,409 next last
To: Enchante

There will be lots of backpedaling by the Dems and the media now.

Here are Jordan's stats from floppingaces.net:

An excellent job done by Wild Bill at Passionate America in discovering who the IM’s were sent to, one Jordon Edmund who appears to have been 18 at the time of the IM’s, here is his bio on MySpace:

2003 to Present

University Of California-Berkeley
Berkeley, CALIFORNIA
Graduated: N/A
Degree: In Progress
Major: Political Science
Minor: Public Policy
Clubs: Cal Hawaii Club - Former Vice President, Student Homecoming Team - Student Ambassador Coordinator(’04) Alumni Director(’06), Cal Ski and Snowboard Club
Greek: Phi Gamma Delta

2002 to 2003

Francis W. Parker School
San Diego,California
Graduated: 2003
Student status: Alumni
Degree: High School Diploma

Congrats to the Democrats, they outed cybersex between two consenting adults!

And one other thing, Wild Bill found this out by doing some detective work when ABC accidently left the IM screenname of Jordon. Did ABC News and Brian Ross do the same kind of investigating? You bet your ass they did, that is their job.

The question is, did they know that Jordon was an adult at the time of the IM’s and then print a lie that it was with a minor?

END UPDATE


281 posted on 10/04/2006 5:59:24 PM PDT by Palladin (Log Cabin Republicans have wooden heads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: stillbjorn
Anyone else think that these IM's are fake? Its a lot easier to fake IM logs than it is to fake Air National Guard documents from the '70s...

I DO, SAID IT FOR 3 DAYS NOW!

282 posted on 10/04/2006 5:59:27 PM PDT by blondee123 (Politicians are like diapers, need to be changed often & for the same reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent

Yes, I have. Cite where the proof is. I don't see it. Sorry


283 posted on 10/04/2006 5:59:31 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: skeeter; All

This is JUST ONE ACCUSER. Please keep this in mind. It does not sink the story.


284 posted on 10/04/2006 5:59:34 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty

Comments section, post #6
http://polipundit.com/wp-comments-popup.php?p=15288&c=1#comments

FYI, you may have heard this, but Selena Zito with the Pittsburgh Tribune Review (I’m pretty sure that’s right) called in on a local (Birmingham,Alabama) talk radio program this morning. She said a major story might break today that a high ranking Democrat knew about the Foley matter and she hinted there was coordination with ABC, probably through George Stephanopoulos to release the story. (Not taking away from what a disgusting creep Foley is, but considering the reaction by the Dems to the story, this would look pretty bad for them IMO). Zito said she had a few more facts to verify, she does not want to report anything until she’s absolutely certain.

She also said other “outings” would most likely occur before the election and would further hurt the Republicans although she said Democrats would probably be affected as well.

I’m paraphrasing what she said, this is basically the gist of it. When the talk radio host asked when this might come out, she said he would be her second phone call.


285 posted on 10/04/2006 5:59:38 PM PDT by Republican Red ("There’s God, then there’s the president and then there’s my father.”- 6 yr old Jack Roberts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

OF COURSE it was a bogus story! Of course there were lies and misrepresentations by ABC, the DIMS, and the Driveby Media in general.....did you honestly expect anything sincere and actually truthful out of these POS's?


286 posted on 10/04/2006 5:59:57 PM PDT by GLH3IL (Truth: The remedy for liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blondee123

Wow. Somebody screwed up, BIG TIME! Breaking and Breaking FAST!


287 posted on 10/04/2006 6:00:08 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (..is an American allright, but is not in Japan, folks. Thanks for letting me keep the moniker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
I know who he is. Prove to me he was older than 18.

It is now known that he is currently at/over 21, so, unless they're using the "new math" that puts him at 18 in 2003.

288 posted on 10/04/2006 6:00:11 PM PDT by capt. norm (Liberalism = cowardice disguised as tolerance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

Geez, can you stop being a broken record for even two seconds?


289 posted on 10/04/2006 6:00:22 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: psjones

Ross's word and Foley's actions after the revolation. And it looks from the IMs and the history we have of the page, he was under 18.


290 posted on 10/04/2006 6:00:22 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

See my post at #281.


291 posted on 10/04/2006 6:00:27 PM PDT by Palladin (Log Cabin Republicans have wooden heads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
Drudge has had a history of attacking the accuser in pedophile cases.

Starting with the pedophile in Chief.

292 posted on 10/04/2006 6:00:32 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1713755/posts


Check it out...

The one that was 18 also wasn't a page anymore when the incident happened.


293 posted on 10/04/2006 6:00:41 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (The Internet is the samizdat of liberty..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: jrooney
The DailyKosNazis are totally ignoring this important development. The MSM is still pretending they are close to a kill...


294 posted on 10/04/2006 6:00:41 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

Let's be clear - I do NOT condone what Mark Foley has done. But does this mean that the Democrats think that Foley's sexual behavior with an adult is illegal?

If so, does this mean that the Democrats believe that Clinton's behavior with an adult was illegal?

If not, does this mean that Democrats believe that Foley's behavior with an adult male is illegal only because he is gay?

Either way, the Democrats are hoist by their own petard - and once again, the main-stream media has manufactured information to suite it's agenda.

But no matter. I am convinced that we do need to investigate Foley to the fullest, just to find out if he IS guilty of any crimes. And we MUST also investigate EVERYONE, Democrat, Republican, or otherwise - in both houses of Congress - for the same. All emails, all correspondence, all phone conversations. EVERYTHING on EVERYBODY.

It's time to clean house of paid public perverts - and we have Foley to thank. I personally am glad Foley was "outed" for his digusting behavior on my dime - but I wonder; will the Democrats will be as happy with these revelations once they find their own in the mix?


295 posted on 10/04/2006 6:00:46 PM PDT by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Yes


296 posted on 10/04/2006 6:00:51 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: NinoFan

Clinton had phone sex in the oval ofice numerous times with Monica and HE DIDN'T resign.


297 posted on 10/04/2006 6:01:24 PM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent; donnalee

FReeper donnalee suggested that Foley was being very careful about these contacts' ages to avoid the "under-18" problem. If the pre-18 IM contacts were not released by ABC, it's possible that they aren't as juicy as the ones they did release. Maybe they were just "overly friendly". They didn't suit ABC's agenda, so they didn't bother with them.


298 posted on 10/04/2006 6:01:32 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: jrooney
I thought it was known already that messages took place between two boys aged 16 and 17, but some of them took place after one boy's 18th birthday. How is this a new development?
299 posted on 10/04/2006 6:02:27 PM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
At least one of the posters revealed through the screw up at ABC has been postively identified according to internet reports, hence the Drudge headline. That person is now 21 years old and the posts were from 2003, QED, he was 18 at the time. Oh, and legal age for 'this sort of thing' is apparently 16 for all of the jurisdictions involved.

Also, just to point up the hypocrisy of the folks pushing this "scandal," the Dhimmicrats have their own "facts in evidence" in Gary Studds, who not only sent messages to a (adult ex page, which is all Foley apparently did) Studds actually buggered the fellow, who was still a page at the time (which is not true of any of the folks Foley sent messages to).
300 posted on 10/04/2006 6:02:45 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 1,401-1,409 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson