Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea wants to talk(says they tested NEUTRON BOMB)
Herald Sun ^ | 10/10/06 | Gerard McManus and agencies

Posted on 10/10/2006 3:37:05 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

North Korea wants to talk

Gerard McManus and agencies

October 10, 2006 12:00am

A NORTH Korean official said Pyongyang is willing to return to international arms talks and abandon its atomic program if the US takes "corresponding measures," reports suggest.

"The nuclear test is an expression of our intention to face the United States across the negotiating table," the unnamed official said, according to South Korea's Yonhap news agency.

"What we want is security of the (North), including guaranteeing our system."

Yonhap didn't say how or where it contacted the official, or why no name was given.

The official didn't elaborate on what the corresponding measures would be.

But one of them is believed to be a long-standing North Korean demand that Washington lift financial restrictions on the communist regime for its alleged counterfeiting and money laundering.

North Korea has cited the financial issue in boycotting nuclear talks with China, Japan, South Korea, Russia and the US The talks last convened in November.

The official also dismissed moves at the UN Security Council to sanction the communist nation over its reported nuclear test.

"We have lost enough. Sanctions can never be a solution," the official said.

"We still have a willingness to give up nuclear weapons and return to six-party talks as well. It's possible whenever the US takes corresponding measures."

Pyongyang declared yesterday that it had successfully tested a nuclear bomb.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: korea; nkorea; northkorea; nucleartest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: Ditto
Correct. And a neutron bomb is very, very detectable by, er, "national resources."

We used to have a fair number of 2-5 kt warheads fielded. This wasn't even that. I'm voting "fizzle" but I haven't seen any hard data yet.

61 posted on 10/10/2006 9:29:39 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Do you have a programme to convert tonnes to metres?


62 posted on 10/10/2006 9:33:56 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The hallmark of a crackpot conspiracy theory is that it expands to include countervailing evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

That thing is like a nuclear hand grenade.....better dig a trench before you light it off!!


63 posted on 10/10/2006 9:42:40 AM PDT by ColoradoAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Correct. And a neutron bomb is very, very detectable by, er, "national resources." We used to have a fair number of 2-5 kt warheads fielded. This wasn't even that. I'm voting "fizzle" but I haven't seen any hard data yet.

Maybe it was a neutrino bomb.

64 posted on 10/10/2006 9:47:46 AM PDT by thesharkboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

OH I SEE if we don't talk to them they do Neutron bomb in my book that blackmail LOL!


65 posted on 10/10/2006 10:24:18 AM PDT by SevenofNine ("Step aside Jefe"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
think of how close Okinawa is to North Korea!

Huh?? Okinawa is close to NK?

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

LOL! Thanks for the ping.

66 posted on 10/10/2006 12:55:54 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

And who gained politically? The Clintons and no one else.

Let's hope that he does a lot of campaigning.


67 posted on 10/10/2006 3:11:35 PM PDT by saveliberty (I'm a Bushbot and a Snowflake :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

Or he may not have enough supply to use the active nukes. He's financially drained and we cut off his counterfeiting, which is at the heart of it all. He is determined to kill until he gets to stay in power (and not get killed by his own military)


68 posted on 10/10/2006 3:13:24 PM PDT by saveliberty (I'm a Bushbot and a Snowflake :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: musicman

Wow! Thank you, musicman.


69 posted on 10/10/2006 3:14:21 PM PDT by saveliberty (I'm a Bushbot and a Snowflake :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Jeff Head; Paul Ross

A lot went into the construction of the test site, a lot more than would be done for a single super critical test. There may have been several subcritical tests done there previously which we never detected (impossible to detect). This weekend's test was either a 1kT plus warhead that malfunctioned, or, it was purposely built to be only a few hundred tons. Neutron bombs (proper name, enhanced radiation weapons) are meant to also be rather small in terms of blast force and are optimized to produce maximum neutron flux, hence the nick name. We cannot rule out anything. Many Western analysts take it at face value that the DPRK is almost as much a rogue in the eyes of China and Russia as they are in ours. But what if China covertly helped, perhaps even proliferating enhanced radiation technology? In fact, most diabolical would be the outright outsourcing of a test to the DPRK so as to appear to continue complying with the NTBT while in fact cheating via the outsourcing. I would not put it past the Chi Coms (or even the Russians) to play such a game.


70 posted on 10/10/2006 3:15:42 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I say we pull out of S Korea and let them deal with it....


71 posted on 10/10/2006 3:16:31 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Tests can be hidden. That's why the Test Ban Treaty is and always has been a complete joke. And we are suckers to have signed it.


72 posted on 10/10/2006 3:17:35 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

So on that note, and considering how many artillery tubes and recoilless rifles the DPRK has, and looking at the distance from Seoul to the DPRK .....


73 posted on 10/10/2006 3:19:01 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

One problem with that theory is the volume. We would have seen all that material being moved to the test site with our eyes in the sky.


74 posted on 10/10/2006 3:20:21 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

.........Bill Richardson is still claiming that we should have one on one, face to face talks with Il.............

Hey Greaseball,

Just stay down on your hands and knees, and continue to find the tapes that Lee left behind in back of the Xerox machine!

STFU


75 posted on 10/10/2006 3:23:46 PM PDT by aShepard (Maybe the UN should donate UNICEF proceeds to the Gates Foundation, and fold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Junior

Blast radius much smaller, overpressure quite limited. Whereas, a standard fission weapon is optimized for blast and overpressure (e.g. the neutron flux is inner directed and focussed at the core of the explosion) an enhanced radiation weapon is optimized for a longer, outward directed neutron flux. Less neutron flux into the fissile material means a less energetic explosive force. The energy goes into the neutron flux instead of a blast. Still, it would be a bummer to be closer than 1000 yards or so, assuming the neutrons would not fry you.


76 posted on 10/10/2006 3:24:04 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Hey man, no doubt, as a young lad I sucked up my share of fallout and didn't get too dain bramaged by it! LOL !!!!


77 posted on 10/10/2006 3:26:50 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded; Jeff Head

It really depends what sort of help they've gotten. Many naively assume that the surface appearance of an isolated rogue state completely precludes outside assistance. Motivation? Simple. There are a handful of states with competent nuclear capabilities who have openly expressed, both before and after 9/11, that they very much would like to reduce /remove so called "American hegemony" from Asia and the Western Pacific.


78 posted on 10/10/2006 3:29:56 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

And we trust Russia and China because .....?


79 posted on 10/10/2006 3:31:09 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
Yes, good old Davey Crockett Rocket ~ stovepipe with a nuke.

They put these critters under the direct command of Spec 4s.

You just know that froze the blood of the Russians down range!

80 posted on 10/10/2006 3:31:46 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson