Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A source close to the regime said North Korea had exploded a neutron bomb to allay doubts about its strength and deter US threats of regime change.

``It's for self-defence: the United States wants regime change,'' the source, who requested anonymity, said in Beijing, noting that Mr Bush had labelled North Korea part of an ``axis of evil'' along with Iran and Iraq in 2002.

There was no independent confirmation that the device was a neutron bomb, designed to release larger amounts of deadly radiation than other nuclear weapons while leaving infrastructure intact.

I am not an expert, but I suspect that N. Koreans are bent on conning their way out of fizzled nuke at the test.

So they blew this one as well as their last long-range missile launch?

1 posted on 10/10/2006 3:37:06 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 10/10/2006 3:37:31 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Well, if they think saying they tested a neutron bomb will make everyone less likely to institute regime change, they are following the Saddam Hussein plan for remaining in power.

Meanwhile, Fox is reporting that the Japanese and others are still ooking for traces of radioation, and so far nothing has shown up.

3 posted on 10/10/2006 3:40:14 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

What does it really matter that North Korea test detonated a micro size nuke underground? WHOOPY... In other news... Somewhere in the remotest parts of Africa, an elephant also farted. What am I missing here?


4 posted on 10/10/2006 3:40:59 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster; nw_arizona_granny
Interesting. Reports yesterday were all over the board as to the significance of this test. This also occurred after NK tested their long-range missile a few months ago.
6 posted on 10/10/2006 3:43:58 AM PDT by Donna Lee Nardo (DEATH TO ISLAMIC TERRORISTS AND ANIMAL AND CHILD ABUSERS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Ingenious. Your nuke test doesn't work, so tell them it was a neutron bomb.


7 posted on 10/10/2006 3:44:33 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster; All
Just in from the blogs:

North Korea Goes Nuclear: The Largest Roundup With Commentary In The Blogosphere

THE BELMONT CLUB ASKS: "Was North Korea testing a suitcase nuke?"

The W54 warhead used on the Davy Crockett weighed just 51 pounds and was the smallest and lightest fission bomb (implosion type) ever deployed by the United States, with a variable explosive yield of 0.01 kilotons (equivalent to 10 tons of TNT, or two to four times as powerful as the ammonium nitrate bomb which destroyed the Alfred P. Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995), or 0.02 kilotons-1 kiloton. A 58.6 pound variant the B54 was used in the Special Atomic Demolition Munition (SADM), a nuclear land mine deployed in Europe, South Korea, Guam, and the United States from 1964-1989.
micro nukes & delivery system, forty year old technology.

The XM-388 casing (including the warhead and fin assembly) weighed 76 pounds, was 30 inches long and measured 11 inches in diameter (at its widest point).


11 posted on 10/10/2006 3:55:18 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The theory that the NKers merely set off 500 tonnes of conventional explosive is looking better and better ...


12 posted on 10/10/2006 3:56:25 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Bill Richardson is still claiming that we should have one on one, face to face talks with Il. Sure makes me wonder if that was not part of the agreement signed by the Clinton administration.

Bill Clinton said that alll Il wanted was respect.
15 posted on 10/10/2006 4:06:22 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

That whole "kills people while leaving buildings intact" line is a load of crap. A neutron weapon is still a nuclear bomb, complete with the attendant fireball and blast effects. It is just a much dirtier version of a standard nuclear weapon.


16 posted on 10/10/2006 4:11:44 AM PDT by Junior (Losing faith in humanity one person at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Tiger is there any doubts being expressed in your region that this was a DUD?

I got a feeling we just witnessed a failure....just a hunch I have.

23 posted on 10/10/2006 4:23:45 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Did China ever get their train back?


25 posted on 10/10/2006 4:29:35 AM PDT by Solamente (Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
"So they blew this one as well as their last long-range missile launch?"

But they have learned much through both of these failures - they will get better at it as the months/years go by.

32 posted on 10/10/2006 4:54:15 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

At this point we can even speculate that Kim bought a Hush-A-Bomb from Boris and Natasha.


42 posted on 10/10/2006 6:11:11 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Dancing through life like a street mime with tourettes syndrome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
How dare you call our test a "fizzle". It was supposed to be like that. It was a...a... neutron bomb. Yeah, that's the ticket. A neutron bomb.
45 posted on 10/10/2006 6:29:08 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (In God we trust. All others we monitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
``It's for self-defence: the United States wants regime change,'' the source, who requested anonymity, said in Beijing, noting that Mr Bush had labelled North Korea part of an ``axis of evil'' along with Iran and Iraq in 2002.

As if they weren't working on it prior to that.

I noted this morning that CBS News has trotted out a "former defense department official" who says that Bush provoked NK into building a weapon with the "axis of evil" speech. A coordinated media attack?

46 posted on 10/10/2006 6:39:44 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Uh, we'll get back to you...after we've found some way to neuter you.


49 posted on 10/10/2006 7:44:19 AM PDT by quesney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
A source close to the regime said North Korea had exploded a neutron bomb

Eyes roll to ceiling.

ROFLMAO.

No way Jose.

54 posted on 10/10/2006 9:11:04 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

i think it was actually one of the dreaded positronic bombs they set off... much more deadly.


55 posted on 10/10/2006 9:11:32 AM PDT by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

OH I SEE if we don't talk to them they do Neutron bomb in my book that blackmail LOL!


65 posted on 10/10/2006 10:24:18 AM PDT by SevenofNine ("Step aside Jefe"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Jeff Head; Paul Ross

A lot went into the construction of the test site, a lot more than would be done for a single super critical test. There may have been several subcritical tests done there previously which we never detected (impossible to detect). This weekend's test was either a 1kT plus warhead that malfunctioned, or, it was purposely built to be only a few hundred tons. Neutron bombs (proper name, enhanced radiation weapons) are meant to also be rather small in terms of blast force and are optimized to produce maximum neutron flux, hence the nick name. We cannot rule out anything. Many Western analysts take it at face value that the DPRK is almost as much a rogue in the eyes of China and Russia as they are in ours. But what if China covertly helped, perhaps even proliferating enhanced radiation technology? In fact, most diabolical would be the outright outsourcing of a test to the DPRK so as to appear to continue complying with the NTBT while in fact cheating via the outsourcing. I would not put it past the Chi Coms (or even the Russians) to play such a game.


70 posted on 10/10/2006 3:15:42 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson