[A. Pole]

The DI has lost every battle it's been in. They lost in the courts in Pennsylvania. They lost in elections in Kansas and Penna. They lost in Michigan and Ohio in the Board of Education.

It means that hard line Darwinists win political and legal game. But this is not science. What if some day a US court or legislature defines number PI as 3.14 exactly or two bearded man to be wife and husband? Oh wait it already has happened.

The falsehood of Darwinism is the claim that the universe is a dead purposeless machine ruled by chance. Darwinian beliefs in random mutations followed by natural selection were product of XIX century mindset LONG BEFORE discovery of genes and DNA.

The calculations show that the complexity of life cannot be accounted by so crude and slow mechanism. Evolution might be a fact but Darwin was not closer to truth than Lamarck. We need new unbiased approach.

[freedumb2003]

What if some day a US court or legislature defines number PI as 3.14 exactly or two bearded man to be wife and husband? Oh wait it already has happened.

Before I take on the rest of your post, I need to see where any court defined PI as 3.14 exactly (the scientific part of your rant).

[curiosity]

The falsehood of Darwinism is the claim that the universe is a dead purposeless machine ruled by chance.

Do you care to point out the passage where Darwin claims "that the universe is a dead purposeless machine ruled by chance?" I've read him extensively, and never have I run accross such a passage.

[Doctor Stochastic]

The calculations show that the complexity of life cannot be accounted by so crude and slow mechanism.

Examples? State your assumptions. Don't leave out any steps. Check your work.