Posted on 11/09/2006 2:51:41 PM PST by foreshadowed at waco
John Gibson just stated that Rep. Conyers has announced that since Speaker Pelosi said that impeachment is 'off the table' that there will be no impeachment of President Bush.
I'm glad Conyers said this.
It shows that Pelosi understands that she is the Speaker of the House of Representatives of the United States of America, at war, and that she doesn't just play one on TV.
It shows that she doesn't intend to let the Democrats lapse into insanity, and it shows that a fanatic liberal old-liner like Conyers is on board with her.
Will they investigate? Sure.
Will they criticize? Of course.
But impeach, like we did to Clinton?
Not on the cards.
Good.
Good, good, GOOD!
If they stay the course on being responsible (and this was certainly a responsible thing to say), then the Republic will come through this ok.
If they are talking about it, it means that they are planning it.
They are going to start with 'hearings' first.
They will deny that the purpose of these 'hearings' is to impeach Bush - but that is exactly what they will be doing.
They will probably work on the Vice president first.
Ah, thank you. Though I've spoken english for many years...I'm still learning. Phrases come up that I do not know what the meaning is and dictionary does not help either.
They do not need to impeach Bush. They have subpoenas and committee chairmanships. The process of indictiment or impeachment may not happen, but dirt-digging investigations will cause to trickle out ever human failing of the administration or anyone related to the administration. This will be the softening-up of the Republicans before Hillary runs for President. This will be a 2 year-long cavity check of the republicans. It will not be fun.
We didn't care about a "distracted" president when it was Clinton. But they just want to impeach Bush for payback. Problem is Bush didn't break the law.
Of course, Klinton sold our secrets to CHINA. He used our military to distract the country from his hearings. He rented out the Lincoln bedroom for campaign contributions from foreigners. He should have been impeached.
What's Hilarious is that Liberals thought a Party willing to LIE, use MASSIVE Voter Fraud, Cheat, and sell out it's nation to it's enemies foor a short term political gain, was going to KEPP it's word!!
I see a lot of those here. I'm much more than half tempted to print off a bunch of second stickers for these idjits that say "Cheney for President - Impeach Bush"
That means YOU, Taggart.
Exactly. behind closed doors, the RATS know they don't have anything new, that they were privy to the same information as Bush was, and they in fact acted on this very same information, which was good information while Demonrats had the WH, but all of a sudden wasn't when Bush took office.
The RATs would have to impeach themselves as well. It's all media spin, media lying to the public in order to regain the whitehouse for their party of choice.
There should be inquiries alright, but they shoukld be directed at corrupt media and the Democrat party.
Except that by the time the drooling MSM breathlessly covers every single investigative hearing, cleaning up the ridiculous parts and the exculpatory parts, the public will be convinced that there is no single law that Bush didn't break.
Or President Murtha.......
EXACTAMUNDO!!! Now he's liberated to be who he really is.
Democrats LIED-Impeachment DIED!
The Republican members of the Senate and House are responsible for getting themselves elected in '08, not by default. They need to work hard, stand on principle and be vocal about it, getting their own message across. No more hidey holes to retreat to when the going gets tough. Get out front and stand up for our country and our troops. America needs a leader now. Who will be the first?
Gee........I don't believe that's different than what he always has been......
Well, the Dems have those FBI files…but there's enough dirt on Democrats…call it a Mexican standoff:-)
It's in their playbook. Agnew then Nixon...
That's why I contend that we should make it clear that our first winess is Bill Clinton.
What charges would they use against Cheney? Being disrespectful to Charlie Rangel? Attempted murder (for shooting that lawyer)?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.