Posted on 11/12/2006 12:59:06 PM PST by grundle
I admire (and share) your standards! :-)
Yes. He is from Detroit. That's why they wrote in that aspect of Magnum's character.
anyone who follows the bill of rights religiously is ok with me.
and the second amendment being the one that guarantees the whole shooting match....beint the MOST IMPORTANT amendment..well then Quigly is OK by me.
Tom Selleck
actor $5,500 Republican
$3,000 Democrat
$1,000 Reform
$1,000 special interest
total: $10,500
Contributor Candidate or PAC Amount Date
SELLECK, THOMAS MR.
BURBANK, CA 91505
T.W.S. PRODUCTIONS II INC./ACTOR BUSH, GEORGE W (R)
President
BUSH-CHENEY '04 COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE INC. $1,000
general 10/18/04
SELLECK, THOMAS
BURBANK, CA 91505
ARTS/JOURNALISM GALLEGLY, ELTON (R)
House (CA 24)
GALLEGLY FOR CONGRESS $500
general 09/29/00
Selleck, Thomas W. Mr.
Burbank, CA 91505
Self MCCAIN, JOHN S (R)
President
MCCAIN 2000 INC $1,000
primary 06/28/99
Selleck, Thomas Mr.
Burbank, CA 91505
TWSII Productions/Actor BRADLEY, BILL (D)
President
BILL BRADLEY FOR PRESIDENT INC $1,000
primary 06/24/99
SELLECK, TOM
BURBANK, CA 91521
TWS PRODUCTIONS SYBERT, RICHARD P (R)
House (CA 24)
RICH SYBERT FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE $250
general 10/17/94
SELLECK, TOM
BURBANK, CA 91521
TWS PRODUCTIONS SYBERT, RICHARD P (R)
House (CA 24)
RICH SYBERT FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE $750
general 09/09/94
SELLECK, TOM
STUDIO CITY, CA 91604
DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE (D) $1,000
primary 06/30/93
SELLECK, TOM
STUDIO CITY, CA 91604
TWS PRODUCTIONS REAGAN, MAUREEN (R)
House (CA 36)
MAUREEN REAGAN FOR CONGRESS $500
primary 02/27/92
SELLECK, THOMAS W
STUDIO CITY, CA 91604 BUCHANAN, PATRICK J (REF)
President
BUCHANAN FOR PRESIDENT $1,000
primary 02/24/92
SELLECK, THOMAS W
STUDIO CITY, CA 91604
SELLECK COMMUNITY PROPERT TSONGAS, PAUL E (D)
President
TSONGAS COMMITTEE INC $1,000
primary 02/07/92
SELLECK, THOMAS W MR
ENCINO, CA 91436
DOLE FOR PRESIDENT COMMITTEE INC $1,000
primary 05/02/88
SELLECK, THOMAS W MR
ENCINO, CA 91436 KEMP, JACK (VICE-PRES) (R)
President
JACK KEMP FOR PRESIDENT '88 $500
primary 03/01/88
SELLECK, THOMAS W
LOS ANGELES, CA 90068
ENTERTAINER
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE - CONTRIBUTIONS (AKA REPUBLICAN NATIONAL FINANCE COMMITTEE (R) $1,000
primary 04/19/84
Like Ronald Reagan was a "Hollywood flake?" Like Charleton Heston was a "Hollywood flake?"
No, if anyone's a flake, it would be he or she who would dismiss others as flakes with no explanation or backup as to WHY...
Figured that might have been the case...wasn't sure.
The only thing wrong with libertarians is that they vote libertarian which is a wasted vote.
libertarian = losertarian
I just call them LIBELtarians."
That's okay, we expect ignorance from our opponents
You think Libertarian votes are wasted? Well, it used to be the case that Republican votes were wasted, back when the party was just starting. Now days, Republicans can learn from their loses, and change their positions to gainfrom support a majority or they can continue as a minority party. Pick one. The RATs would be very happy for the big government, DemocRAT light Repubs to stay out of power. Personally, I would like to give the party of slavery and FDR (but I repeat myself) a swift kick into the ashcan of history. The RAT party deserves it.
It's funny how the same lie is repeated over and over. The LIEbertarians may lap that up, but it's still a lie. Coincidence that the criticism comes from LIEberal states? I think not.
I'll wager you never heard of the COBURN AMENDMENT that was signed by the President.
Elected Libertarians are few and far between, that is true. It is also true, that unless the Republican party gets right on the issues it will continue to lose again and again. Who is the bigger loser - the party which has a very limited presence, or the party which loses both the House and the Senate? It seems to me that the higher the height of the fall, the harder the bounce.
Federal spending under Bush is up in real terms, as a percentage of GDP and in total amount - Coburn Amendment or not. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2007/pdf/spec.pdf
His beliefs as they are spelled out here are fine by me, I don't care what he calls himself. And he hasn't asked any cops if they were Jooos, has he?
I've always been a Tom Selleck fan. I'm also a libertarian. I haven't seen anything in this article to alter either position.
In that they never (very rarely) elect a candidate, yes, I do think they are wasted.
In that they possibly send a message, no, but unfortunately, nobody's listening.
You're right on the money. I've sometimes been amazed at the support for Big Brother that we see on this site.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.