Skip to comments.
Freeper exclusive: Weapons cache demolition causes many to be sick from exposure in Baghdad
private e-mails
| 11/16/2006
| RaceBannon
Posted on 11/16/2006 4:54:12 PM PST by RaceBannon
I just received a private e-mail from someone I know from a Marine website who has family in Iraq. There has been a weapons cache explosion that caused many, hundreds of people to be exposed to some chemical that was present in the weapons.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushlied; bushtried; chemicalweapons; chems; iraq; nbc; rehirerumsfeld; rumint; weaponscache; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 401-419 next last
To: Moolah
Let's not worry about the politics until we find out how many people are affected by this please. That is what my post was stating and why it was posted to the person it was responding too.
Did this happen yesterday or today?
WHy no news coverage?
To: RaceBannon
Any further updates or developments on this?
Scouring the dino media has resulted in zip, zero, nada which is not surprising.
The blogosphere has also yeilded the same.
Off to check Ray Robinson's site now.
To: RaceBannon
104
posted on
11/16/2006 5:37:09 PM PST
by
1COUNTER-MORTER-68
(THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
To: xmission
Doesn't fit the template.
105
posted on
11/16/2006 5:37:28 PM PST
by
null and void
("Jihad" just means "[My] Struggle", but then again, so does "Mein Kampf"...)
To: justa-hairyape
"...Why would US troops falsify the report ?No way would I believe they would, either.
I'll refrain from speculation, we'll know soon enough.
106
posted on
11/16/2006 5:39:17 PM PST
by
labette
(I'm not an expert, but I play one on Free Republic. You can too!)
To: browngreengold
Still waiting, it all depends on the e-mails from Iraq to here now
107
posted on
11/16/2006 5:39:40 PM PST
by
RaceBannon
(Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
To: RaceBannon
This is hearsay reporting at best, irresponsible and dangerous at worst. E-mails one or two times removed should be sat upon to avoid unnecessary speculation and possible undue alarm among families who have service men and women serving in Iraq. A true FReeper Exclusive should be an eye-witness account not some e-mail...
To: VaMarVet
My thoughts as well. Several factors involved, but I do not buy it as of yet.
109
posted on
11/16/2006 5:49:08 PM PST
by
Enosh
To: RaceBannon
Has any of this hit the media circuit yet?
110
posted on
11/16/2006 5:49:33 PM PST
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: TexKat
111
posted on
11/16/2006 5:50:11 PM PST
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Welcome Home, son! You and your comrades are our heroes!))
To: VaMarVet
It is an eye witness account, told through 2 person, admittedly, but from the source who got it first hand
112
posted on
11/16/2006 5:51:15 PM PST
by
RaceBannon
(Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
To: VaMarVet
You are correct, however email is now accepted in court from what I have heard. If you sent an email containing a terrorist threat, you are just as libel as making the terrorist threat in person, for example. But we definitely need confirmation. Perhaps we should probably look for confirmation in the Iraqi media. Sounds like a lot of Iraqi's were injured.
To: Enosh
114
posted on
11/16/2006 5:51:40 PM PST
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: RaceBannon
When was this supposed to have happened Race?
115
posted on
11/16/2006 5:52:58 PM PST
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: Allegra
Have you heard anything about this?
116
posted on
11/16/2006 5:54:51 PM PST
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: Enosh
While a different war - we had numerous false-postives for chemical attacks during the Desert Storm ground war - most were caused by a toxic mix of a modern battlefield and the oil-field fires. Not sure what this account is all about - but one should not specualte until more definitive information is available.
To: VaMarVet
Someday you should hope to have the credibilty of
RaceBannon here.
If "he" felt the report was credible enough to post here, especially in "Breaking News", that's good enough for me.
118
posted on
11/16/2006 5:58:10 PM PST
by
michigander
(The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
To: RaceBannon
Did your last Freeper Exclusive ever come to fruition?
119
posted on
11/16/2006 5:58:10 PM PST
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: RaceBannon
This would have happened 36+ hours ago and there are no official reports?
To: justa-hairyape
You are correct, however email is now accepted in court from what I have heard. If you sent an email containing a terrorist threat, you are just as libel as making the terrorist threat in person, for example. What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
To: VaMarVet
E-mails one or two times removed should be sat upon to avoid unnecessary speculation and possible undue alarm among families who have service men and women serving in Iraq. Well stated and until collaborated by more sources than one E-mail twice removed it might better be considered "Breaking Rumor."
122
posted on
11/16/2006 6:00:20 PM PST
by
Cagey
To: TexKat
123
posted on
11/16/2006 6:00:44 PM PST
by
RaceBannon
(Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
To: michigander
Someday you should hope to have the credibilty of RaceBannon here.If "he" felt the report was credible enough to post here, especially in "Breaking News", that's good enough for me.
I guess you put me in my place with that one.
To: TexKat
I am trying to confirm it now, waiting for a response
125
posted on
11/16/2006 6:01:50 PM PST
by
RaceBannon
(Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
To: VaMarVet; michigander
I have been wrong before, but I never posted somethig that I doubted without stating it was doubtful.
I trust my source and stick by my story.
If it is false or exaggerated, I will mea culpa openly. :)
126
posted on
11/16/2006 6:05:02 PM PST
by
RaceBannon
(Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
To: RaceBannon
Why couldn't they blow that cache before the election? /tongueincheek
127
posted on
11/16/2006 6:06:13 PM PST
by
NonValueAdded
(Prayers for our patriot brother, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub. Brian, we're all pulling for you!)
To: RaceBannon; VaMarVet; michigander
By the way, I was given this information because I was posting JVERITAS translation and other news articles on WMD's for some time on another website.
I was his trusted source to reveal it.
128
posted on
11/16/2006 6:07:18 PM PST
by
RaceBannon
(Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
To: RaceBannon
Has this source given you credible information in the past?
To: RaceBannon
If true it surprises me that some of the cable news reporters in Iraq would not be affected by this and broadcast it, especially Fox News and their every 15 minutes breaking news alerts.
130
posted on
11/16/2006 6:10:31 PM PST
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: RaceBannon
If it was a nerve agent or Sarin the symptoms would be all the dead people laying around the site. That would happen within minutes of the explosion.
131
posted on
11/16/2006 6:12:13 PM PST
by
Flint
To: VaMarVet
Well, potentially, you can be libel for sending false or inflammatory information via email. Especially if you knew it was false at the time and the information was determined to be actionable. Someone called 'Foley' comes to mind.
To: RaceBannon
You know Jim, even if your e-mail account turns out to be true I have to ask - what does it matter? A "I told you so" to the Dems? This has been going on long enough - we are losing this war and have to find a way to win...
To: RaceBannon
I am trying to confirm it now, waiting for a responseI hope you get a response soon. There are many Freepers that have family members, friends serving in Iraq that may be concerned, worried about this.
134
posted on
11/16/2006 6:13:33 PM PST
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: Flint
Could the more toxic agents degrade over time and not be as effective as they were when 'fresh'.
To: justa-hairyape
"Well, potentially, you can be libel for sending false or inflammatory information via email. "LOL! So, who's going to sue, the terrorists for giving them a bad name?
To: e_castillo
I'd love to, but its been deleted.
137
posted on
11/16/2006 6:16:06 PM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: RaceBannon
But the Demorats trying to trash America have maintained there were NO WMDs in Iraq and NO CHEMICAL WEAPONS!!! My Gosh, were they lieing to us to help the terrorists? or worse to undermine Our Nation??????
To: Enchante
139
posted on
11/16/2006 6:17:17 PM PST
by
Fedora
To: RaceBannon
140
posted on
11/16/2006 6:17:36 PM PST
by
cgk
(I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
To: justa-hairyape
It takes two chemicals mixed together to activate the agent. That is why the comment about the rounds needing to spin is about. The chemicals are designed to be stored until needed. Military stockpiles of weapons are designed to function when needed.
141
posted on
11/16/2006 6:17:38 PM PST
by
Flint
To: VaMarVet
You know Jim, even if your e-mail account turns out to be true I have to ask - what does it matter? A "I told you so" to the Dems? This has been going on long enough - we are losing this war and have to find a way to win... Sorry but I think an I-told-you-so is VERY MUCH in order. The Democrats called the President a liar and used this accusation to great effect to cripple the war effort by undermining public support for it. Anything that would reveal (truthfully and justly -- no dirty tricks) to the general wobbly swing voter the Democratic Party's terminal unseriousness on foreign policy/use of force is CRUCIAL to finding a way to win.
142
posted on
11/16/2006 6:18:14 PM PST
by
Zhangliqun
(The fetal position has yet to scare a bully.)
To: RaceBannon
Dammit! If President Bush knew there were such things in Iraq, he should have told us!
143
posted on
11/16/2006 6:19:22 PM PST
by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: RaceBannon
More evidence that there were, and still are, WMD in Iraq.
144
posted on
11/16/2006 6:19:37 PM PST
by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: RaceBannon
Why couldn't they have had this little accident 2 weeks ago?!?
145
posted on
11/16/2006 6:19:53 PM PST
by
Redcloak
(Speak softly and wear a loud shirt. (FReeping from Hawaii this week. Aloha!))
To: COEXERJ145; Lizarde
That's right, mushroom clouds mean nothing. We used to get really nice one when EODT would blow munitions every afternoon. When the sun was setting sometimes the cloud would have nice red and rose hues to it!
146
posted on
11/16/2006 6:19:58 PM PST
by
Eagle Eye
(There ought to be a law against excess legislation.)
To: VaMarVet
I guess you put me in my place with that one. My apologies to you. That came off pretty bad on my part given a second look.
Hell, someday I hope to have his credibility here.
Again, my apologies for that.
147
posted on
11/16/2006 6:20:01 PM PST
by
michigander
(The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
To: spunkets
Come on. This is America. You can sue for any reason you want. The question as always is whether you will win.
To: True Republican Patriot
But the Demorats trying to trash America have maintained there were NO WMDs in Iraq and NO CHEMICAL WEAPONS!!! My Gosh, were they lieing to us to help the terrorists? or worse to undermine Our Nation?????? Attitudes like that do not help the war effort. Bottom-line is that we have a war to win and playing the "there really were WMD" in Iraq game is distracting from that effort.
To: TexKat
I agree with you.
The e-mail says they heard the information yesterday morning.
It doesn't take that long for word to get out.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 401-419 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson