McCain-Soros Toppled GOP Candidates

HUMAN EVENTS ^ | Nov 21, 2006 | Rabbi Aryeh Spero

[fight_truth_decay]

Soros lends support to political watchdog group CREW. CREW blasted Pelosi for supporting Murther and had earlier placed Murther on a politicians' watch list in regard to corruption.

June 13, 2006
John McCain & George Soros: New York Encounter

THE WASHINGTON NOTE

You read, you decide.

[Just mythoughts]

Are you suggesting that Reagan, Bush 1 and 2 did have the same press? In 1984 the MSM was all about Reagan drooling. The press doesn't matter if the candidate has the correct positions and shows strength. The MSM uses the candidate's weaknesses to defeat them.

No I am not suggesting a difference in press coverage. The amount however was complete saturation, 24/7. What I am saying is that since President Reagan, we have the 'I feel' generations sent on their way into this world with the public educational system of seeing the world under how one 'feels'. These have NO memory of President Reagan, and the numbers of Reagan voters no longer among us is dwindling that voter group into a nonexistence impact.

The 'I feel' generations have their brains on sensory reactions and every exposure they were given to President Bush was a negative feeling. These liberals and all their tentacles preached that Iraq was not involved in terrorism and that OIL was the reason why we invaded. Add that to the Clintons UNIONS, (government and teachers) and the S$ORO$ funded outreaches, gelled the public at large into voting at the local level on how they felt.

The liberals had to get the attention of their base, in Missouri where I live, it was attaching an amendment of a minimum raise increase. Also millions were invested into a salvation program of cloning and that was sold to coverage the state covered health recipients Medicaid.

The 'news' 24/7 was a campaign arm, no matter the point of origin with the continuous drumbeat of Vietnamization of Iraq, President Bush is a liar, Republicans were the party of corruption (sadly there were some names and faces to give that persona).

Now granted these liberals took advantage of presenting President Bush on vacation when he should have been in New Orleans saving 'millions' of people, but cause of their race, he could not be bothered. The whole hurricane and aftermath became the fault of President Bush.

My point is that for Republicans to have countered the mass hysterical media preaching Bush hate 24/7 was not a financially possible endeavor.

These liberals would be in debt for decades in they were required to fund every bad news about Bush/Republicans and the ever streaming nice coverage given to liberals.

[TBP]

If Republicans had not peed off their base, the base might hav egotten motivated to go out earlier and do the work that was needed to retain Congress. You don't win if you pee off your base.

The left has been better at exploiting hte campaign censorship bill, but instead of complaining about this unconstitutional bill, we should learn to do better at exploiting it ourselves while we continue to try to restore the Constitution by getting rid of it.

The bill is patently unconstitutional and everyone knows it.

BTW, I heard independent expenditure ads right up through Election Day. Someone should have filed a suit to stop them, hoping that they would lose and the law would be overturned. And maybe in the meantime, that Communazi America-hater Soros (who should be investigated under the treason, sedition, and RICO laws) would be constrained a bit from buying Congress for his fellow anti-Americans.

Isn't there some way we can denaturalize this jerk?

[ElPatriota]

As long as we are thinking toward 2008, I think it is only fitting to revise what Senator MacaCain’s actions to sabotage the Republican Party in the past two years, especially as he comtemplates running for President. What this man did to his own party goes straight to the quality of his character. "With friends like this who needs enemies!" The saying goes and could not apply any better in this case.

http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/HughHewitt/2006/11/08/the_road_not_taken__forfeiting_a_majority

[ez]

The Country was extremely unhappy with their perception of their governance.

[arthurus]

You're in the wrong party.

[Mo1]

There are others reasons why the Dems won

But he pretty much nailed it in this article

[Salvation]

McCain-Soros.

If the shoe fits -- wear it.

[Mo1]

If Republicans had not peed off their base, the base might hav egotten motivated to go out earlier and do the work that was needed to retain Congress. You don't win if you pee off your base.

Though I agree they cost us the Congress in this election

But I disagree that they are the base ... the base came out and voted

Now the question is .. will the fringe stay home and not vote in 08 .. or will they give us all another Clinton Administration like they did before

[Mo1]

grrrrr ... note to self .. pay attention when typing

will the fringe stay home and not vote in 08 ... or = will the fringe get out and vote in 08 .. or

[Delphinium]

McCain got his revenge.

[Delphinium]

Wow, really? I wish there were more Democrats like him.

I wish more democrats would commit treason against their party like he does.

[Tamzee]

The author is even MORE RIGHT than he knows... Soros wasn't just a fatcat that took advantage of McCain-Feingold, he was the huge fatcat that HELPED PASS IT to begin with so he could then pour multi-millions into our political system to defeat Republicans.

The article below is a must-read and completely details the course of Soros' billions changing and exploiting our campaign system... it's horrifying how much he has accomplished.

-----

Soros' "Reform"
By James O. E. Norell
First Freedoms | May 31, 2004


"If there were an illustration accompanying the word "hypocrisy" in the dictionary, it would be an engraving of globalist billionaire George Soros."

"Soros, one of the richest men in the world, backed campaign finance reform with huge cash donations to a wide variety of Washington "reform" special interest groups to accomplish what his funding conduit called an effort "to reduce the corrupting influence of very large donors" and to ban pre-election "issue advocacy" ads by groups like the NRA."

"Now, arch-reformer Soros is pouring perhaps as much as $30-million of his own money into left-wing "progressive" organizations he believes are uniquely inoculated against the restrictions of the very law Soros bought and paid for – restrictions like the ban on broadcast political advertising."

{snip}

"Without Soros spending at least $18 million to fund an army of the slickest "public interest" D.C. lobbyists and PR spin meisters, it is doubtful that McCain-Feingold would have become law. Soros was the hand in the sock-puppet."

{snip}



http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=13584

[Tamzee]

Great set of links, thanks.

You might also want to check out the article I indicated in post #53 about Soros' years-long involvement in sabotaging our political system... and how far he has gotten now with McCain's direct help :-(

[Modok]

No, McCain is not a democrate he is a Republican. See he has an R after his name on the ballot, so if we don't vote for him we are voting for a democrat. Ahhhh, my nuts just fell off!!!

[concrete is my business]

RE: or will they give us all another Clinton Administration like they did before?

IMHO, the Clintons have to split the right to win the WH and so the Clintons need a Ross Perot for '08.

And it is starting to look like maybe Tancredo is it.

I am keeping a close eye on that double agent conservative Pat Buchanan too.

If he plays true to form, Buchanan will be supporting the vote splitter.

[Mo1]

I think that's what they are planning on doing also

[Popman]

CFR

President Bush did not veto it.
President Bush did not veto it.
President Bush did not veto it.
President Bush did not veto it.
President Bush did not veto it.
President Bush did not veto it.
President Bush did not veto it.

At what point do we get it?

McCain is a dirty filthy, back stabbing, egoistical insane RINO

Bush is a great leader, good politician, overall I think he is a stand up guy and I'm sure glad he is in the oval office instead of Gore or Kerry.

He may be all those things, but he is not the leader of Reagan conservatives

[ConservativeGreek]

'I feel' generations have their brains on sensory reactions and

I agree to a point.
Reagan connected with people. So did Clinton. And they reached out to the public over the noise of the MSM each time they were in trouble.
W doesn't do that.
Elections are won and lost by a candidate's strength and his ability to connect with his constituency. To a lesser degree the Party's image has an impact on the voting public.
In many ways W allowed the media to define Iraq and his administration.
He cannot communicate his positions easily with one on one discussions on TV. A few press conferences can't move the public with a War going on.
Unlike Clinton his spokepeople are weak or non-existent.

[ConservativeGreek]

The Country was extremely unhappy with their perception of their governance

Wish I could agree.
Republicans did themselves in.
Blaming Soros and McCain is not an answer and certainly not the reason for the losses.